Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    effector tilting into bed on print

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Tuning and tweaking
    6
    175
    22.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • TimVukmanundefined
      TimVukman
      last edited by

      Thanks Danal
      Here is the new beg.g file
      ; bed.g file for RepRapFirmware, generated by Escher3D calculator
      ; 10 points, 6 factors, probing radius: 10, probe offset (0, 0)
      G30 P0 X0.00 Y10.00 Z-99999 H0
      G30 P1 X8.66 Y5.00 Z-99999 H0
      G30 P2 X8.66 Y-5.00 Z-99999 H0
      G30 P3 X0.00 Y-10.00 Z-99999 H0
      G30 P4 X-8.66 Y-5.00 Z-99999 H0
      G30 P5 X-8.66 Y5.00 Z-99999 H0
      G30 P6 X0.00 Y5.00 Z-99999 H0
      G30 P7 X4.33 Y-2.50 Z-99999 H0
      G30 P8 X-4.33 Y-2.50 Z-99999 H0
      G30 P9 X0 Y0 Z-99999 S6

      My bed is 220mm. I used 100mm as the radius in the formula

      I get no messages, and nothing is recorded in the g-code console.

      I watched it very carefully as something caught my eye while doing this so many times.

      The effector goes off to a spot between my X and Z columns and lowers, but not enough to trip the Z switch, and then it moves left to just past the Z column and dips down again without triggering. It then centers and triggers.

      I think it is doing the same thing 10 times and then stops.

      Do you think maybe I've got a couple of axis motors mixed up?

      I will check, but that is going to make me feel terrible if this has been for a dumb mistake.
      If that's the case, it would still home properly, right? and I could still set my trigger height?
      I'll update soon

      Tim

      dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • TimVukmanundefined
        TimVukman
        last edited by

        my columns are

         Z
        

        Y X

        Is this correct?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • TimVukmanundefined
          TimVukman
          last edited by

          Ok, The correct wires from the board go to the correct motors.

          Whew!!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dc42undefined
            dc42 administrators @TimVukman
            last edited by

            @timvukman said in effector tilting into bed on print:

            The effector goes off to a spot between my X and Z columns and lowers, but not enough to trip the Z switch, and then it moves left to just past the Z column and dips down again without triggering. It then centers and triggers.

            If you have deployprobe.g and retractprobe.g files in /sys that you didn't create yourself, delete them.

            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Danalundefined
              Danal
              last edited by Danal

              Looking at the printer, Z tower (motor, endstop) in the back, X to your left, Y to your right.

              Then check movement. Make all moves with web control, if any validation step fails, stop and report back:

              1. Home All (or G28) Validation: Proper home move.

              2. Move Z downward, so web commands will be "negative" buttons. Move -50. Validation: Effector moves down, and stays centered between towers.

              3. Move Y +100. Validation: Effector should move STRAIGHT TOWARD Z TOWER; and effector does not change height above bed at all. Yes, confusingly enough, Y+ is straight toward Z tower. 🙂

              4. Move Y -100. Validation: Effector moves back to center, does not change height above bed.

              5. Move X +100. Validation: Effector moves to a position NOT aligned with ANY tower... it will be between the Z and Y towers, about 2/3 toward the Y tower. (Of course, it is 90 degrees from the Y axis we found in step(3)... and 90 degrees is about 2/3 off from the 120 degree spacing of the towers). Height above bed should not change.

              That validates every kind of move.

              Delta / Kossel printer fanatic

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • TimVukmanundefined
                TimVukman
                last edited by

                Home All (or G28) Validation: Proper home move.
                Confirmed to have worked properly and registered in the system (web buttons Home X, Home Y, and Home Z turned blue. X is 0. Y is 0. Z is 198

                Move Z downward, so web commands will be "negative" buttons. Move -50. Validation: Effector moves down, and stays centered between towers.
                Confirmed that effector moved down 5 shots of 10 and is still centered. X is 0. Y is 0. X is Z is 148

                Move Y +100. Validation: Effector should move STRAIGHT TOWARD Z TOWER; and effector does not change height above bed at all. Yes, confusingly enough, Y+ is straight toward Z tower. 🙂
                Effector has moved to sit directly in front of the Z column. Height is 148. X is 0, Y is 80. Diagonal rods are almost, but not quite vertical.

                Move Y -100. Validation: Effector moves back to center, does not change height above bed.
                Effector has moved back to about center. Height is 148 X is 0, Y is -15

                Move X +100. Validation: Effector moves to a position NOT aligned with ANY tower... it will be between the Z and Y towers, about 2/3 toward the Y tower. (Of course, it is 90 degrees from the Y axis we found in step(3)... and 90 degrees is about 2/3 off from the 120 degree spacing of the towers). Height above bed should not change.
                It looks about right. X is 84.1 Y is -12.6 Z is 148

                I took the top apart before I did what was above, because I had a small gap on one rail.

                I had my motors / columns as described above which mean that I needed to swap X with Y to match the positions as you described them. I swapped the end stops as well.

                One significant observation came when I removed the bed to trace the wires. On the left side, the bracket that clips on the rail and holds the female nut for the bed was not sitting down flat on the rail. It look like one end bent into the side of the rail. There was a definite fold line in the clip. I straightened that and put the clip back in place. It is now sitting flat. I believe that to be cause of the problem, IE the be was 1/8" higher there.

                I ran Auto Delta Configuration from the browser interface. The start is not registered in the G-Code Console. There are no messages indicating pass, fail, or error in the G-Code Console.

                There have been no changes in Config-Override.g.

                I noticed that in my bed.g file, I had entered the radius as 10 instead of 100.

                Fixed, created a new bed.g file.

                The Auto Configuration certainly changed where it was probing and now appears appropriately spread out.

                The was no on screen message during or after running Auto Configuration. There are no new messages in the G-Code Console. There are no changes or additions to the H values in the Bed.G file. There are no changes in Config-Override.g,

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • dc42undefined
                  dc42 administrators
                  last edited by

                  Did you see my earlier reply?

                  If you have deployprobe.g and retractprobe.g files in /sys that you didn't create yourself, delete them.

                  Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                  Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                  http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • TimVukmanundefined
                    TimVukman
                    last edited by

                    Hi dc42
                    Yes, I read it, but I did not delete the files as I forgot about it in swapping everything else around. I have now deleted the files and am pleased to report that I got a message on the screen and in G-Code console at the end of the AutoConfig.

                    "G32
                    Calibrated 6 factors using 10 points, deviation before 2.988 after 0.107"

                    M665 reported different settings than those that I entered in my Config.g.

                    **M665

                    Diagonal 360.200, delta radius 124.727, homed height 204.383, bed radius 85.0, X -0.501°, Y -4.385°, Z 0.000°**

                    **× M666

                    Endstop adjustments X2.88 Y1.39 Z-4.27, tilt X0.00% Y0.00%**

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • TimVukmanundefined
                      TimVukman
                      last edited by

                      Ok
                      I ran Auto Configuration again, and I should not have done that.

                      My effector left the area defined by the bed. I killed it with emergency stop after one of the magnetic rods popped off the carriage. I don't think M500 was a good idea.

                      I have my original values for Config.g G31 written down.

                      Please advise as to how I should proceed. I will leave it alone until I hear back.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • dc42undefined
                        dc42 administrators
                        last edited by dc42

                        Your Y tower angle offset of more than 4 degrees sounds suspicious. If the 3 sides of your base and upper triangles are all of equal lengths, it should be much smaller than that.

                        Your endstop adjustments are also rather large, assuming you attempted to get all 3 endstop switches at more of less the same height (getting them equal to within 1mm isn't normally difficult).

                        What type of Z probe are you using?

                        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • TimVukmanundefined
                          TimVukman
                          last edited by

                          When you mention y tower offset, are you referring to the -4.385 that was returned in M665?

                          This was an FLSun kit, so my verticals are all the same length(3) as are each of the cross members(9)

                          As I recall, the end stops were not too hard to adjust. Maybe I should redo them after all the moving I have been doing?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • dc42undefined
                            dc42 administrators
                            last edited by

                            And what type of Z probe does it have?

                            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • TimVukmanundefined
                              TimVukman
                              last edited by

                              The probe is a 3 pin switch that can be set to either normally open or normally closed.
                              The switch is on the side of the effector and is triggered by pushing the nozzle into the bed.

                              Is the Duet effector with carriages hard to install? I would like to stop pushing the nozzle into the bed to trigger it. It seems to really push on it around the outer diameter of the bed when all the rods are on an angle.

                              T3P3Tonyundefined dc42undefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • T3P3Tonyundefined
                                T3P3Tony administrators @TimVukman
                                last edited by

                                @timvukman The Smart effector has carriage adaptor that are sized to screw into "standard" linear rails that alot of the wheeled carriages are modelled on as well:

                                https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Smart_effector_and_carriage_adapters_for_delta_printer#Section_Carriage_Adaptor_Dimensions

                                You will need to do some requiring to use it:
                                https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Smart_effector_and_carriage_adapters_for_delta_printer#Section_Connectors_and_Wiring

                                www.duet3d.com

                                TimVukmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • dc42undefined
                                  dc42 administrators @TimVukman
                                  last edited by

                                  @timvukman said in effector tilting into bed on print:

                                  The probe is a 3 pin switch that can be set to either normally open or normally closed.
                                  The switch is on the side of the effector and is triggered by pushing the nozzle into the bed.

                                  I suggest you watch carefully as it probes the bed, to see if you can see any reason why the height at which the probe triggers may change with different XY positions.

                                  Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                  Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                  http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                  TimVukmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • TimVukmanundefined
                                    TimVukman @T3P3Tony
                                    last edited by

                                    @t3p3tony
                                    Hi:
                                    I have reviewed that documentation in quite a bit of detail. As I read it, it indicates that it would support rails or wheels. My current factory setup has three wheels spread over a fair amount of vertical carriage height. The measurements for the duet carriages indicate that the wheels would be vertically closer together which I feel would be more stable. I have lots of extra wheels, so I feel that adding a fourth wheel would be fairly straight forward.

                                    I am not a huge fan of trying to install crimp connectors on small wires / sockets. I'd like to feel comfortable that these are large enough to work with. I'm not as good as I once was with these things.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • TimVukmanundefined
                                      TimVukman @dc42
                                      last edited by

                                      @dc42
                                      I would think that the height must change at various XY positions to some degree, by virtue of the diagonal rods following pendulum arcs. I thought that was why there was an H value in the G30 codes so that offsets could be put in to level the effector.

                                      I think I am still confused between calibration and height adjustments. The documentation shows a beautiful light green flat surface for the mesh. I get something that looks more like a coffee cup with lots of blue. I think it is all indicated above.

                                      I honestly think that my tilting problem was the nozzle contacting the bed because the plastic clip on the bottom rail between the X and Z columns was not sitting flat. On that basis, I think it is "fixed"

                                      I guess I don't get what Auto Configuration means. It doesn't seem like it is automatic since it changed values and now put the nozzle off the bed diameter.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • dc42undefined
                                        dc42 administrators
                                        last edited by

                                        If the height map is cup shaped, then most likely your delta radius is out. But that wouldn't result in an error of 4 degrees in one of the tower positions. Perhaps you should try using a smaller probing radius, at least for now.

                                        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                        adavidmundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • TimVukmanundefined
                                          TimVukman
                                          last edited by

                                          Ok
                                          I started over from the beginning.

                                          I home my printer. I took out the little screws from the top of the carriages. My switches click at pretty much the exact same time.

                                          My Z shows as 245 in DWC
                                          I move Z down until it traps a piece of paper.
                                          My Z shows as 34 in DWC
                                          I issue a G92 Z0 to set that as my 0 height
                                          I issue G30 S-1 to get my trigger height of 1.17
                                          I issue an M500 to save the settings.
                                          I power off the printer to give it time think about what it's going to do when I power it back up.

                                          Power Up
                                          Home All
                                          Z registers 245

                                          I have adjust my height to 216 since when I home it, it drops by 5. Once there, the actual distance to the bed surface is 211. If I send my printer z to 0, it is perfectly aligned on a sheet of paper.

                                          I thought I should be able to print from here, but I can't. The nozzle digs into the bed.

                                          So, I guess I need to run auto config, even though that screwed up all my settings last time.

                                          No idea what I should do next.

                                          Obviously there are people who have working delta printers. Also obvious is that some of these working printers are also using these boards as well..

                                          Unless someone has a suggestion I am going to leave it for a bit, until I get the duet effector / carriage kits.

                                          adavidmundefined dc42undefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • adavidmundefined
                                            adavidm @dc42
                                            last edited by

                                            @dc42 his probing radius is 10mm according to that bed.g. that doesn't look right but I don't think going smaller is going to help....

                                            I think there is confusion over Cartesian coordinates Vs the naming of the three towers as X,Y and Z and that is causing a mismatch between expectation and reality, both in understanding the G31 offsets and the general movement of the effector.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA