Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Rigid vs Flexible Couplers for Trapezoidal Leadscrews?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    15
    53
    12.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • LHelgeundefined
      LHelge
      last edited by

      To avoid Z-banding it's important that the leadscrews are rigidly mounted in one end. Both ends is a bad idea, especially if the leadscrew or coupling isn't perfectly straight.

      I have 3 printers:

      • Prusa I2 style: Leadscrews hanging from a flexible coupling on the motor, no support in the bottom. -> Z-banding
      • Prusa I3 style: Flexible coupling in the bottom to the motor and a bearing with set-screws on the top. -> no Z-banding
      • Hypercube Evolution: Rigid couplings on the bottom by the motors, floating in normal bearing in the top. -> no Z-banding
      fmaundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • fmaundefined
        fma @JoergS5
        last edited by

        @joergs5 said in Rigid vs Flexible Couplers for Trapezoidal Leadscrews?:

        A next point to think of is backlash: if you change direction, is there any?

        Same, with spring couplers, if you exceed maximum rated torque (under strong accelerations, for example), motor shaft and leadcrew may not remain in sync (maybe not really a problem for Z axis, but can be for X/Y).

        Frédéric

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • fmaundefined
          fma @LHelge
          last edited by

          @lhelge said in Rigid vs Flexible Couplers for Trapezoidal Leadscrews?:

          To avoid Z-banding it's important that the leadscrews are rigidly mounted in one end. Both ends is a bad idea, especially if the leadscrew or coupling isn't perfectly straight.

          Unless you have a floating coupler between the nut and the bed; this is my current config (as it was on my previous printer), and it work fine.

          Look for (good) anti-Z-wobble, where the nut only push the bed up, but is free to move in XY plane. There is an anti-rotation system so the nut does not turn, but only translates:

          https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2646220

          And an example of a bad anti-wobble system:

          https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2121017

          There, I guess top, bottom and nut are all rigid, and as you said, this is not good at all.

          Frédéric

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • Dougal1957undefined
            Dougal1957 @kraegar
            last edited by

            @kraegar those zyltech ones aren't actually oldham couplings at all whereas the Misumi ones are

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • kraegarundefined
              kraegar
              last edited by

              Ah, thanks - guess I was mis-using the term for those. They're the better of the cheaper conventional offerings, if you buy good ones.

              Agreed on the points here about having enough constraint without overconstraining them. We mount the stepper rigidly on the bottom. We use a yoke to tie the leadscrew & linear rail together, and attach the bed. We do not constrain the top of the leadscrew in any way.

              Co-Creator of the RailcoreII CoreXY printer
              https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2407174

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Stephen6309undefined
                Stephen6309
                last edited by

                I'm using the flexible aluminum couplers with a 4mm ball bearing inside to eliminate any compression, but still allows bending.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Dougal1957undefined
                  Dougal1957
                  last edited by Dougal1957

                  I Have ordered 3 of the misumi Oldhams so will be interesting to see how good they are but I will also be useing thrust bearings between the bottom of the oldham and the face of the stepper motor so that there is no axial load going into the motor bearing as I feel that would lead to a fairly rapid failure.

                  Doug

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • kraegarundefined
                    kraegar
                    last edited by

                    I might need to pick up some of the Misumi oldhams to try and compare, too.

                    Co-Creator of the RailcoreII CoreXY printer
                    https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2407174

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • kraegarundefined
                      kraegar
                      last edited by

                      Did some digging and turned up this:

                      https://www.ruland.com/resources/technical-articles/technical-article-servo-coupling

                      Indeed, I was using the wrong term for the ones from Zyltech. I'll leave my error to avoid confusion. (also, helpful article)

                      Co-Creator of the RailcoreII CoreXY printer
                      https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2407174

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                      • SnowCrashundefined
                        SnowCrash
                        last edited by SnowCrash

                        I'm always amazed by the complexity behind even the most seemingly simple things 🙂

                        Thank you to everyone who contributed to this discussion!

                        I learned a lot (mainly about how much I don't know...), and took my time digesting the various advice and excellent leads (thanks for the article link, @kraegar, very helpful indeed!)

                        @fma, you're right of course about the difficulty of offering advice without knowing the specifics, and indeed I was initially inclined to provide a detailed description within my original post. However, I eventually decided against it precisely because I wanted to keep the discussion open-ended and wide as possible, rather than narrowing it down by focusing on a particular setup or application. I hope this makes sense.

                        @JoergS5, many thanks for the methodological breakdown of the subject-matter into logical steps. Very helpful indeed in tackling this!

                        @Phaedrux, @kraegar, @Stephen6309 & @LHelge, thanks for sharing your practical knowledge and research conclusions.

                        @Dougal1957, @kraegar & anyone else who might engage in testing different solutions, please do come back and share your insights and discoveries. I - and I think others too - would certainly be interested to hear about your experience.

                        As for myself, from what I've read so far, the 'Zero Backlash Jaw Couplings' look like they could offer the best balance between accuracy of torque transmission and allowance for misalignment. These cuties aren't cheap, though, so I'm currently searching for the best deal on quality parts. I'll report back once I have them on hand and assembled.

                        Thanks again everyone!
                        SnowCrash

                        JoergS5undefined wilrikerundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JoergS5undefined
                          JoergS5 @SnowCrash
                          last edited by JoergS5

                          @snowcrash Thank you for your nice words!

                          I started building a printer from scratch about 6 months ago and still learning something new about the physics of the planned printer every day. Besides the 3D printer forums, I am more and more in the CNC forums also, because they are used to take into account effects of 1/100 mm and below. Understanding the CNC issues help improving 3D printers also.

                          One example: thermal expansion is a widespred issue in the CNC area (and how to solve it), because mixing aluminium with steel is used often. In 3D printer construction it is often neglected, but without a reason, Because you mix materials here also, and mixing and at the same time fixing will cause bending or breaking. One example is the heat bed.

                          I wish you the best for improving your printer and much fun.

                          SnowCrashundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • SnowCrashundefined
                            SnowCrash @JoergS5
                            last edited by SnowCrash

                            Thanks, @JoergS5, a CNC is definitely on my list too 🙂

                            Which CNC forum/s would you most recommend? (I promised myself I won't go into the CNC project before the printer is done, but no harm in just looking, right?)

                            Dougal1957undefined JoergS5undefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Dougal1957undefined
                              Dougal1957 @SnowCrash
                              last edited by

                              @snowcrash don't do it you will get sucked in lol

                              SnowCrashundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • wilrikerundefined
                                wilriker @SnowCrash
                                last edited by

                                @snowcrash said in Rigid vs Flexible Couplers for Trapezoidal Leadscrews?:

                                As for myself, from what I've read so far, the 'Zero Backlash Jaw Couplings' look like they could offer the best balance between accuracy of torque transmission and allowance for misalignment. These cuties aren't cheap, though, so I'm currently searching for the best deal on quality parts. I'll report back once I have them on hand and assembled.

                                Please do so, because I would also be interested in this. I just recently rebuilt my Z axis to no longer use this kind of coupling at all but still I find this very interesting and I always keep my options to revert/change anything. 🙂

                                Manuel
                                Duet 3 6HC (v0.6) with RPi 4B on a custom Cartesian
                                with probably always latest firmware/DWC (incl. betas or self-compiled)
                                My Tool Collection

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • wilrikerundefined
                                  wilriker
                                  last edited by

                                  Looking around for these zero backlash jaw couplings I came across ones where the spider has 4 segments about equal in size (each) to one of the jaws and others where the spider has 6 segments that are considerably smaller (maybe half) than the jaws.

                                  Has anyone any opinion on these two types?

                                  Manuel
                                  Duet 3 6HC (v0.6) with RPi 4B on a custom Cartesian
                                  with probably always latest firmware/DWC (incl. betas or self-compiled)
                                  My Tool Collection

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • JoergS5undefined
                                    JoergS5 @SnowCrash
                                    last edited by JoergS5

                                    @snowcrash said in Rigid vs Flexible Couplers for Trapezoidal Leadscrews?:

                                    Thanks, @JoergS5, a CNC is definitely on my list too 🙂

                                    Which CNC forum/s would you most recommend? (I promised myself I won't go into the CNC project before the printer is done, but no harm in just looking, right?)

                                    The largest seems to be CNCzone.com/forums, one of the technical best I found is practicalmachinist.com/vb

                                    Sometimes I find interesting threads on reddit.com also.

                                    To get ideas I check openbuilds.com

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • SnowCrashundefined
                                      SnowCrash @Dougal1957
                                      last edited by SnowCrash

                                      Hi all,

                                      @dougal1957 said in Rigid vs Flexible Couplers for Trapezoidal Leadscrews?:

                                      @snowcrash don't do it you will get sucked in lol

                                      Too late... 🙂

                                      Thanks for the links, @JoergS5!

                                      Some really nice machines out there 🙂

                                      One of the biggest challenges I'm facing atm as I'm working on the prototype is that I often need small custom metal parts and it's incredibly difficult to find anyone to make small quantities at a reasonable price.

                                      So if there's anyone who's based in the UK and already has a CNC and would be willing to help out (I'd of course cover all the costs of material and fabrication) - please ping me!

                                      Back to the present topic, my search for suitable couplings led me to realize that I haven't provided enough support for the leadscrews to begin with. Apparently, without sufficient lead-screw support, there's little even high-quality couplings can do, so tackling this issue has become the top priority.

                                      Once it's sorted (I hope 🙂 ) , I'll proceed to the matter of couplings and report back.

                                      @wilriker said in Rigid vs Flexible Couplers for Trapezoidal Leadscrews?:

                                      Looking around for these zero backlash jaw couplings I came across ones where the spider has 4 segments about equal in size (each) to one of the jaws and others where the spider has 6 segments that are considerably smaller (maybe half) than the jaws.

                                      Has anyone any opinion on these two types?

                                      Sorry, @wilriker, I only came across spiders with 4 segments in my research and unfortunately don't know enough to offer any help on this.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • Dougal1957undefined
                                        Dougal1957
                                        last edited by

                                        I Received my Oldham couplings from Misumi and jeez they are nice and they are also very compact (About half the size of the std couplings that we normally use) I also realise that using them directly could transfer quite a lot of side thrust into the stepper motor bearing's so I intend to fit some Thrust bearings between the coupling and the stepper body to account for the side thrust.

                                        Doug

                                        SnowCrashundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • SnowCrashundefined
                                          SnowCrash @Dougal1957
                                          last edited by

                                          @dougal1957 said in Rigid vs Flexible Couplers for Trapezoidal Leadscrews?:

                                          I Received my Oldham couplings from Misumi and jeez they are nice and they are also very compact (About half the size of the std couplings that we normally use) I also realise that using them directly could transfer quite a lot of side thrust into the stepper motor bearing's so I intend to fit some Thrust bearings between the coupling and the stepper body to account for the side thrust.

                                          Doug

                                          Thanks for the update, @Dougal1957. But I'm a bit confused by how you describe your planned setup: if the thrust bearings goes between the coupling and the stepper motor, does that mean it will actually be going around the motor's shaft? If you could perhpas post some pics once you've got it installed, it'd be awesome as I'd love to see it and learn how you went about it 🙂

                                          Dougal1957undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Dougal1957undefined
                                            Dougal1957 @SnowCrash
                                            last edited by

                                            @snowcrash here you go I do need to locate a slightly smaller bearing and make a spacer up for between the bearing and the coupling the one shown is a 10mm bore one and I am looking for a 6 or 8 mm one the reason for the over size is I dont want the bottom race to be in contact with the shaft at all.

                                            HTH

                                            Doug 0_1538028553862_20180927_070035.jpg

                                            SnowCrashundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA