Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Murmeltier
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 2
    • Posts 8
    • Best 1
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Murmeltier

    @Murmeltier

    1
    Reputation
    1
    Profile views
    8
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online

    Murmeltier Unfollow Follow

    Best posts made by Murmeltier

    • RE: Duet3 6HC, reference voltage for temperature sensors

      @droftarts Perfect, exactly what I was looking for. Worked great for both of my boards. I now have differences (among the sensors) of 0.5 ° C. With the fixed resistors it was only 0.1 ° C!
      perfect thank you!

      posted in Duet Hardware and wiring
      Murmeltierundefined
      Murmeltier

    Latest posts made by Murmeltier

    • RE: closed loop nema 17/23 driver/controller for Duet 3 6hc board

      @dc42 said in closed loop nema 17/23 driver/controller for Duet 3 6hc board:

      closed loop expansion board under development,

      @dc42 When will the closed loop Board be available? Can I already order some 🙂

      posted in Duet Hardware and wiring
      Murmeltierundefined
      Murmeltier
    • RE: Duet3 6HC, reference voltage for temperature sensors

      @droftarts Perfect, exactly what I was looking for. Worked great for both of my boards. I now have differences (among the sensors) of 0.5 ° C. With the fixed resistors it was only 0.1 ° C!
      perfect thank you!

      posted in Duet Hardware and wiring
      Murmeltierundefined
      Murmeltier
    • Duet3 6HC, reference voltage for temperature sensors

      On my 6HC mainboard all temperature values at 20°C are about 4°C too low (all the sensors are correctly configured with default values). The same sensors show the correct values on the Expansion Board 3HC (with the same parameters). It seems like the reference voltage on my 6HC board is wrong. Can this be checked? Can this possibly be adjusted?

      posted in Duet Hardware and wiring
      Murmeltierundefined
      Murmeltier
    • RE: G29/mesh.g in 3.2beta2 usage?

      @jay_s_uk said in pre or post code for G-Code:

      I think calling of mesh.g is broken in beta 2 with an SBC attached if thats what you have.

      I don't necessarily think so ...

      In mesh.g I should probably use "G29 S0" (this works).

      But if someone calls "G29 S0" directly, mesh.g is not executed ... and the problem is there again.

      posted in Beta Firmware
      Murmeltierundefined
      Murmeltier
    • RE: G29/mesh.g in 3.2beta2 usage?

      i agree with you... but this dont work.

      my system upgrade to 3.2-beta2 is done.

      without a mesh.g file everything is like it was before.

      with a new mesh.g file (only one line in it with "g29") i get the error

      G29 Error: Push(): stack overflow

      maybe a Stack overflow occurs when iu run a recursive macro ?

      posted in Beta Firmware
      Murmeltierundefined
      Murmeltier
    • RE: G29/mesh.g in 3.2beta2 usage?

      @Phaedrux said in pre or post code for G-Code:

      mesh.g

      Thank's - I found this

      In RepRapFirmware 3.2 and later, mesh.g is run in response to a G29 command with no parameters. If file mesh.g is not found then it behaves like G29 S0 instead.

      I have to update first ..

      I'll try it out and give feedback... !

      posted in Beta Firmware
      Murmeltierundefined
      Murmeltier
    • RE: G29/mesh.g in 3.2beta2 usage?

      @Phaedrux said in pre or post code for G-Code:

      bed.g macro

      Thank's Phaedrux - but this don't help. I use this macro already, that's fine - but if someone else call a g29 (eg. a start script from a slicer, or duet's WEB-Interface or...) then - crash..... if a tool is grabbed at this time.

      G32 s not a problem - because i can park my tool first in bed.g....

      I have to make sure, that NEVER a tool is loaded when a G29 command is executed. Otherwise my system has a mechanical crash...

      posted in Beta Firmware
      Murmeltierundefined
      Murmeltier
    • G29/mesh.g in 3.2beta2 usage?

      In my project, I have to park first my Tool before a G29 can be executed.

      If a soloution availible to send a pre or post code for a specific G-Command

      e.g.

      macro-g29.g
      T-0 ; park tool
      do somthing else
      G29 ; execute the real G29 command
      do somthing else

      posted in Beta Firmware pre post g-code macro
      Murmeltierundefined
      Murmeltier