Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. singhm29
    3. Best
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 19
    • Posts 72
    • Best 2
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Best posts made by singhm29

    • RE: Very confused with Duet mesh level correction

      @phaedrux

      I wasn't too sure if it was the gantry or the bed so I tried correcting both.

      Here was my bed level before doing any changes to the physical bed.
      29a932e6-7d75-452d-b2ff-d78d87b9f857-image.png

      Here it was after I loosened the bed corners so that the springs were all completely loose and then I moved the gantry to rest on the steppers at the bottom of the Z axis (equalizing the Z gantry tilt from left to right and back to front). From here again I set the Z probe offset which changed from 2.5 to 3.1mm. Here is what I got from that
      e154ef0c-974d-4bb6-b968-a08e12dde664-image.png

      Not particularly promising...so being humble I decided to give another go at bed leveling manually. Here is the result from that 3dfb185b-0687-45f1-9f7e-da333b3f6267-image.png

      Now to give some context I am not new to bed leveling manually as I have been printing since 2015 but here what was really baffling.

      I turned off G29, G32 and G29 S1 from my start gcode printed for a round and the first layer came out well.

      I turned on G29 and G32 and lo and behold with no physical changes to the bed I now had this
      969467e5-1ed4-4980-960b-a2f02dcc4ecb-image.png

      Thinking it was possibly the presence of G29 followed by G29 S1 I turned it back on to see if that would cause an issue. Again the new bed level came out great.
      a3911065-92a1-4739-91b2-aa9cbc834871-image.png

      So I am back to a good looking bed but I have no idea how it was fixed. I'm hoping this will stick and wont be doing any physical changes. Lets see how long this lasts! Open to any thoughts but either way appreciate walking me through the possible issues.

      posted in Tuning and tweaking
      singhm29undefined
      singhm29
    • RE: Skipping gridpoint during probing despite offset inclusion

      @fcwilt Hey thank you very much for your feedback as well I went ahead and tried what you advised above and it worked very well! Makes alot of sense to use that approach to keep things simple and I am now happy to report all points are probed and it gets quite close to the edge on each side still.

      I used @jay_s_uk tip on changing my probe point to X35 and that also fixed my ramming of my X endstop when executing G32.

      Thank you for the help, looks like probing is figured out for now!

      posted in Tuning and tweaking
      singhm29undefined
      singhm29