Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Bad command & Missing characters in Gcode since firmware upgrade

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved
    General Discussion
    13
    43
    2.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T3P3Tonyundefined
      T3P3Tony administrators @norbs12
      last edited by

      @norbs12 can you confirm this only occurs if you are uploading while printing, this is what @HBM-3D found.

      www.duet3d.com

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dc42undefined
        dc42 administrators @norbs12
        last edited by

        I am still hoping that one of you can send me a comparison of the original vs. corrupted files, using Windows fc /b or some similar command. See my reply of 20 September.

        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

        norbs12undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • norbs12undefined
          norbs12 @dc42
          last edited by norbs12

          @dc42 said in Bad command & Missing characters in Gcode since firmware upgrade:

          I am still hoping that one of you can send me a comparison of the original vs. corrupted files, using Windows fc /b or some similar command. See my reply of 20 September.

          diff Orig.gcode Downloaded.gcode 
          863362c863362
          < G1 X69.968 Y5.986 E0.00274
          ---
          > G1 X69.968 Y59.986 E0.00274
          863364c863364
          < G1 X70.502 Y59.729 E.00274
          ---
          > G1 X70.502 Y59.729 E0.00274
          863391c863391
          < G1 X57.055 Y6 X4.310 E0.00357
          ---
          > G1 X57.055 Y64.310 E0.00357
          908950c908950
          < 1 X62.824 Y98.654
          ---
          > G1 X62.824 Y98.654
          908990c908990
          < G1 X1G02.446 Y66.725 E0.00361
          ---
          > G1 X102.446 Y66.725 E0.00361
          909168c909168
          < G1 X103.024Y66.246 E0.00529
          ---
          > G1 X103.024 Y66.246 E0.00529
          909193c909193
          < G1 X109.288 YY66.944 E0.00303
          ---
          > G1 X109.288 Y66.944 E0.00303
          909325c909325
          < G1 105.718 Y70.234 E0.00378
          ---
          > G1 X105.718 Y70.234 E0.00378
          909346c909346
          < G1 X103.8273 Y65.606 E0.00274
          ---
          > G1 X103.873 Y65.606 E0.00274
          909374c909374
          < G1X108.523 Y68.658 E0.00274
          ---
          > G1 X108.523 Y68.658 E0.00274
          909399c909399
          < G1 F21800
          ---
          > G1 F1800
          909426c909426
          < G1 X05.883 Y46.145 E0.00355
          ---
          > G1 X105.883 Y46.145 E0.00355
          909435c909435
          < G1 X08.937 Y47.507 E0.00355
          ---
          > G1 X108.937 Y47.507 E0.00355
          909450c909450
          < G1 X1F207.974 Y52.969 E0.00373
          ---
          > G1 X107.974 Y52.969 E0.00373
          909488c909488
          < G1 X06.991 Y46.409 E0.00341
          ---
          > G1 X106.991 Y46.409 E0.00341
          909501c909501
          < G1 X2109.593 Y50.121 E0.00329
          ---
          > G1 X109.593 Y50.121 E0.00329
          909799c909799
          < G1 X108.652 Y50891 E0.00274
          ---
          > G1 X108.652 Y50.891 E0.00274
          909806c909806
          < G1 X106.9987 Y52.455 E0.00269
          ---
          > G1 X106.987 Y52.455 E0.00269
          933045c933045
          < G1 X129.607 Y68.005 F1000.000
          ---
          > G1 X129.607 Y68.005 F18000.000
          933048c933048
          < G1 X133.198 Y70.51 F18000.000
          ---
          > G1 X133.198 Y70.751 F18000.000
          933062c933062
          < G1 X122.179 Y59.2 319 E0.00576
          ---
          > G1 X122.179 Y59.319 E0.00576
          933509c933509
          < G1 X68.243 Y2.863 E0.00312
          ---
          > G1 X68.243 Y62.863 E0.00312
          933546c933546
          < G1 X7Y3.197 Y64.893 E0.00307
          ---
          > G1 X73.197 Y64.893 E0.00307
          933736c933736
          < G1 X53.455 Y66.03 E0.00355
          ---
          > G1 X53.455 Y66.003 E0.00355
          933738c933738
          < G1 X52.239 Y65.621 E0.0009
          ---
          > G1 X52.239 Y65.621 E0.00609
          933760c933760
          < G1 X53.400 Y.058.721 E0.00358
          ---
          > G1 X53.400 Y58.721 E0.00358
          1181427c1181427
          < G1 X27.108 Y2.058 E0.00194
          ---
          > G1 X27.108 Y42.058 E0.00194
          1181429c1181429
          < G1 X31.272 Y46.431 0.00343
          ---
          > G1 X31.272 Y46.431 E0.00343
          1181461c1181461
          < G.01 X27.108 Y45.205 E0.12357
          ---
          > G1 X27.108 Y45.205 E0.12357
          1181488c1181488
          < G1 X34.926 Y55.959 E000139
          ---
          > G1 X34.926 Y55.959 E0.00139
          1181513c1181513
          < G1 X207.108 Y50.658 E0.09256
          ---
          > G1 X27.108 Y50.658 E0.09256
          
          dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • Vinculumundefined
            Vinculum
            last edited by

            Thanx. My files were all too big to compare. I tried 4 different program but they all crashed or simply refused to do it.

            dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jay_s_ukundefined
              jay_s_uk
              last edited by

              Try notepad++ It has a compare plugin

              Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • dc42undefined
                dc42 administrators @Vinculum
                last edited by

                @HBM-3D said in Bad command & Missing characters in Gcode since firmware upgrade:

                Thanx. My files were all too big to compare. I tried 4 different program but they all crashed or simply refused to do it.

                Did you try Windows fc /b ? AFAIK it can handle very large files. The output when using /b isn't line oriented, but that might actually make things easier for me.

                Cam you confirm that the original and corrupt files have exactly the same length? They should have, because the upload mechanism does a check on the file size at the end.

                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • dc42undefined
                  dc42 administrators @norbs12
                  last edited by

                  @norbs12 said in Bad command & Missing characters in Gcode since firmware upgrade:

                  @dc42 said in Bad command & Missing characters in Gcode since firmware upgrade:

                  I am still hoping that one of you can send me a comparison of the original vs. corrupted files, using Windows fc /b or some similar command. See my reply of 20 September.

                  diff Orig.gcode Downloaded.gcode
                  ...
                  

                  Thanks. There is something very odd about those diffs. For example:

                  > 863364c863364
                  > < G1 X70.502 Y59.729 E.00274
                  > ---
                  > > G1 X70.502 Y59.729 E0.00274
                  

                  Clearly, a 0 has been dropped here (after the E). In most other instances, one character has again been dropped.

                  > 863391c863391
                  > < G1 X57.055 Y6 X4.310 E0.00357
                  > ---
                  > > G1 X57.055 Y64.310 E0.00357
                  

                  But here, " X" appears to have been inserted.

                  > 908990c908990
                  > < G1 X1G02.446 Y66.725 E0.00361
                  > ---
                  > > G1 X102.446 Y66.725 E0.00361
                  

                  This time, "G" appears to have been inserted.

                  > 909193c909193
                  > < G1 X109.288 YY66.944 E0.00303
                  > ---
                  > > G1 X109.288 Y66.944 E0.00303
                  

                  And here, 'Y' has been inserted.

                  The fact that both these reports are using Duet Ethernet and not Duet WiFi leads me to believe that this is an issue with the transfer of data by DMA from the Ethernet chip, or just possibly an interaction between DMA to the SD card and DMA from the Ethernet chip..

                  Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                  Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                  http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                  norbs12undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • norbs12undefined
                    norbs12 @dc42
                    last edited by

                    @dc42 I do have another ethernet chip, from a different board, I can swap it out today and try again. It might take me some time to get back to you since usually this only happens when the printer has been active and warmed up.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • dc42undefined
                      dc42 administrators
                      last edited by

                      PS - please can you try again using Windows fc /b to show the differences. Given that RRF checks the received file size, I have a theory that the DMA from the Ethernet chip is dropping bytes, then inserting extra ones at the end of the block in order to finish the block. A diff using fc /b will make it clear whether or not this is the case.

                      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • botundefined
                        bot
                        last edited by

                        @HBM-3D said in Bad command & Missing characters in Gcode since firmware upgrade:

                        Thanx. My files were all too big to compare. I tried 4 different program but they all crashed or simply refused to do it.

                        Visual Studio Code is my new go-to GCode editor. It has comparing built in and can open massssssssive files.

                        *not actually a robot

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • tekkydaveundefined
                          tekkydave
                          last edited by

                          On Windows I always use Textpad as a great editor. Also has a good visual built-in file compare facility.

                          ~ tekkydave ~
                          D-Bot: 300x300mm | Duet WiFi + Duex2 | 3 independent z motors | X,Y & Z linear rails | E3D Titan Aero + V6 | Precision Piezo z-probe
                          FreeCAD, PrusaSlicer

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • norbs12undefined
                            norbs12
                            last edited by

                            @dc42 quick question, I noticed that M38 doesn't seem to return the exact sha1 even when files are the same. Is this just a bug or am I misunderstanding something.

                            (using "shasum <filename>" on a Mac)
                            a03e3b0b03697fccb2997d3e33140801713830c0
                            -vs-
                            (M38 on Duet)
                            a03e3b0b3697fccb2997d3e33140801713830c0
                            
                            

                            There is an extra '0' using 'shasum' near the beginning of the checksum. I ran the m38 command twice just to make sure it was not a fluke.

                            Just to make sure I ran a diff and it found no differences.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • dc42undefined
                              dc42 administrators
                              last edited by

                              Thanks for pointing this out. It's a bug, zeros are sometimes omitted. The SHA1 function was contributed code which I didn't check thoroughly. Will be fixed in next release.

                              Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                              Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                              http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                              norbs12undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • norbs12undefined
                                norbs12 @dc42
                                last edited by norbs12

                                @dc42 said in Bad command & Missing characters in Gcode since firmware upgrade:
                                OK I got to testing a different ethernet board. Same issues unfortunately. I was thinking of trying out the secondardy SD card slot on my paneldue. I would have to wire it up, do you think it's worth the effort?

                                Also is there a way to slow down the communication between the network card and the processor in maybe some test firmware? I'd try this myself if I knew how... Was thinking just cut the speed in half just to see if it fixes anything, then if it works make this somehow accessible through a custom gcode command and allow tuning of it (if that's even possible).

                                Thanks for pointing this out. It's a bug, zeros are sometimes omitted. The SHA1 function was contributed code which I didn't check thoroughly. Will be fixed in next release.

                                No worries, it's close enough to get a good idea if it's the same file. Was just using 'grep' to speed up verifying if it matched and it didn't show up but looked like it should have, which is the only reason I noticed it.

                                T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • T3P3Tonyundefined
                                  T3P3Tony administrators @norbs12
                                  last edited by

                                  @T3P3Tony said in Bad command & Missing characters in Gcode since firmware upgrade:

                                  @norbs12 can you confirm this only occurs if you are uploading while printing, this is what @HBM-3D found.

                                  @norbs12 is this only an issue if you upload a file while it is printing? That appeared tto be what @HBM-3D reported

                                  www.duet3d.com

                                  norbs12undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • norbs12undefined
                                    norbs12 @T3P3Tony
                                    last edited by

                                    @T3P3Tony It does seem to be only while printing though I have not had a chance to confirm that it's not related to temperature of the board. Meaning I have not tried uploading immediately after a long print.

                                    T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • T3P3Tonyundefined
                                      T3P3Tony administrators @norbs12
                                      last edited by

                                      @norbs12 ahh ok, if its only during a print thats still an issue but less of an issue!

                                      www.duet3d.com

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • Vinculumundefined
                                        Vinculum
                                        last edited by

                                        I tried it right after week-long prints and no issue. Only while the printer is running while uploading I get this situation. Uploading when idle never gives issues.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • chrishammundefined
                                          chrishamm administrators
                                          last edited by

                                          @HBM-3D Maybe a trivial question but was there a deviation of the file sizes between your original and the uploaded file (in plain bytes)?

                                          Duet software engineer

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • kmhudginsundefined
                                            kmhudgins
                                            last edited by

                                            Hi,
                                            I am starting to have the same issue with bad commands. Was this problem every resolved?

                                            norbs12undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA