Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Y axis moving when trying to move Z axis with multiple Z motors

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
    Beta Firmware
    6
    26
    1.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • HWWundefined
      HWW
      last edited by HWW

      Dont know why I didnt think of this before using the M584 command on its own spits out the drive mapping in the console. I never got around to actually testing the extruders but looks like those are mapped wrong as well. You can see in this photo I tried entering the M584 with the mapping command as well and the report after is also screwed up.

      2019-12-21 14.18.50Sml.jpg

      The first info from the M584 shows 0.0 and 0.1 mapped into the first two spots on the z axis followed by 0.5 and 0.4 this is using the last config line I was using which was "M584 X1.0 Y0.0:0.1 Z0.5:0.4:0.3:0.2 E1.1:1.2"

      Then in the console I tried entering my original config of "M584 X1.0 Y0.0:0.1 Z0.2:0.3:0.4:0.5 E1.1:1.2" and it again results in 0.0 and 0.1 in the first two spots with 0.2 and 0.3 filling the last two.

      And in both cases the extruders are mapped to 0.0 and 0.1 which I never noticed before as well

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • droftartsundefined
        droftarts administrators
        last edited by

        Try defining those connected to main board without 0. on front.

        Ian

        Bed-slinger - Mini5+ WiFi/1LC | RRP Fisher v1 - D2 WiFi | Polargraph - D2 WiFi | TronXY X5S - 6HC/Roto | CNC router - 6HC | Tractus3D T1250 - D2 Eth

        HWWundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • HWWundefined
          HWW @droftarts
          last edited by HWW

          @droftarts No change in the result from removing the explicit board number, I also went ahead and threw in my other test of assigning all the Z motors to the Y axis to confirm that entering the mapping into the console was changing things and you can see the strange result from that as well. The Y axis is mapped correctly but both Z and E are incorrect.

          2019-12-21 14.31.52sml.jpg

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • droftartsundefined
            droftarts administrators
            last edited by

            Can you try mapping all drives individually in order, eg
            M584 X0.0 Y0.1 Z0.2 U0.3 V0.4 W0.5 A1.0 B1.1 C1.2 P9
            And see what it reports?

            The only other thing I notice is that in the RRF 3 overview notes, a comma is used to delimit the second board. Might be a typo, though? https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/RepRapFirmware_3_overview#Section_M584

            Ian

            Bed-slinger - Mini5+ WiFi/1LC | RRP Fisher v1 - D2 WiFi | Polargraph - D2 WiFi | TronXY X5S - 6HC/Roto | CNC router - 6HC | Tractus3D T1250 - D2 Eth

            HWWundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • HWWundefined
              HWW @droftarts
              last edited by HWW

              @droftarts Assigning them all individually like that they mapped correctly, the drive map report matched the mapping command.

              I played around with it a bit more and I think whats happening has something to do with having multiple motors on two axis

              I tried M584 X0.0 Y0.1:0.2 Z0.3 U0.4 V0.5 W1.0 A1.1 B1.2 P8 and that mapped correctly

              However when I tried M584 X0.0 Y0.1:0.2 Z0.3:0.4 U0.5 V1.0 W1.1 A1.2 P7

              the resulting map was X0.0 Y0.1:0.2 Z0.1:0.2 U0.5 V1.0 W1.1 A1.2

              Also in all cases the extruders were mapped to 0:0 and 0:1 which I think is a default value since no E parameter was in the mapping

              2019-12-21 17.52.40sml.jpg

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • HWWundefined
                HWW
                last edited by

                Yeah look at this one
                2019-12-21 17.59.07sml.jpg

                M584 X0.0:0.1 Y0.2:0.3 Z0.4:0.5 E1.0:1.1
                

                results in a reported drive map of
                X0.0:0.1 Y0.0:0.1 Z0.0:0.1 E0.0:0.1

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Danalundefined
                  Danal
                  last edited by Danal

                  Yep. I just tried two axis with two motors each. Reproduced the issue.

                  12/21/2019, 7:02:51 PM	M584 X0.0 Y0.1:0.3 Z0.4:0.5 U0.2 E0.3:0.4
                  12/21/2019, 7:02:58 PM	M584
                  Driver assignments: X0.0 Y0.1:0.3 Z0.1:0.3 U0.2 E0.1:0.3, 4 axes visible
                  

                  Z should be 4 5, instead it is repeat of Y's 1 3. E is wrong as well, again, a repeat of 1 3

                  Interestingly enough, it is OK to have multiple motors on Z and E. This is my day-to-day configuration on a tool changer:

                  12/21/2019, 7:06:11 PM	M584
                  Driver assignments: X0.0 Y0.1 Z0.3:0.4:0.5 U0.2 E1.0:1.1, 4 axes visible
                  

                  Delta / Kossel printer fanatic

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • droftartsundefined
                    droftarts administrators
                    last edited by

                    So, bug? One for @dc42? Thanks for getting to the bottom of it!

                    Ian

                    Bed-slinger - Mini5+ WiFi/1LC | RRP Fisher v1 - D2 WiFi | Polargraph - D2 WiFi | TronXY X5S - 6HC/Roto | CNC router - 6HC | Tractus3D T1250 - D2 Eth

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Danalundefined
                      Danal
                      last edited by Danal

                      Certainly looks like a bug.

                      And I'm running what I believe to be the very latest:

                      Board: Duet 3 MB6HC (MB6HC)
                      DSF Version: 1.1.0.5
                      Firmware: RepRapFirmware for Duet 3 MB6HC v0.6 or 1.0 3.0beta12+1 (2019-12-02b2)
                      

                      Delta / Kossel printer fanatic

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Danalundefined
                        Danal
                        last edited by

                        Same thing happens if X has more than one motor, it "overlays" all later multimotor axis mappings.

                        12/21/2019, 7:12:02 PM	M584 X0.0:0.3 Y0.1 Z0.4:0.5 U0.2 E1.0:1.1
                        12/21/2019, 7:12:08 PM	M584
                        Driver assignments: X0.0:0.3 Y0.1 Z0.0:0.3 U0.2 E0.0:0.3, 4 axes visible
                        

                        TRIPLE motor Z seems to work fine:

                        12/21/2019, 7:13:29 PM	M584 X0.0 Y0.1 Z0.3:0.4:0.5 U0.2 E1.0:1.1
                        12/21/2019, 7:13:42 PM	M584
                        Driver assignments: X0.0 Y0.1 Z0.3:0.4:0.5 U0.2 E0.3:0.4, 4 axes visible
                        

                        However, DUAL motor Z overlays E:

                        12/21/2019, 7:14:39 PM	M584 X0.0 Y0.1 Z0.4:0.5 U0.2 E1.0:1.1
                        12/21/2019, 7:14:45 PM	M584
                        Driver assignments: X0.0 Y0.1 Z0.4:0.5 U0.2 E0.4:0.5, 4 axes visible
                        

                        Delta / Kossel printer fanatic

                        HWWundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • HWWundefined
                          HWW @Danal
                          last edited by HWW

                          @Danal Triple motor Z also overwrote the E mapping

                          My best guess is that whatever values are getting used for multi motor mapping are not reset or filled or something between cycles of the code loop running

                          Danalundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Danalundefined
                            Danal
                            last edited by Danal

                            Yep, and it looks like it is the "single line parser" loop. Specifying each axis on a separate line yields proper results. For example, with this sequence, E never gets overlaid:

                            12/21/2019, 7:17:40 PM	M584
                            Driver assignments: X0.0 Y0.1 Z0.3:0.4:0.5 U0.2 E1.0:1.1, 4 axes visible
                            12/21/2019, 7:17:45 PM	M584 X0.0
                            12/21/2019, 7:17:58 PM	M584 Y0.1:0.3
                            12/21/2019, 7:18:16 PM	M584
                            Driver assignments: X0.0 Y0.1:0.3 Z0.3:0.4:0.5 U0.2 E1.0:1.1, 4 axes visible
                            12/21/2019, 7:18:34 PM	M584 Z0.4:0.5
                            12/21/2019, 7:18:41 PM	M584
                            Driver assignments: X0.0 Y0.1:0.3 Z0.4:0.5 U0.2 E1.0:1.1, 4 axes visible
                            12/21/2019, 7:18:54 PM	M584 E1.0:1.1
                            12/21/2019, 7:18:59 PM	M584
                            Driver assignments: X0.0 Y0.1:0.3 Z0.4:0.5 U0.2 E1.0:1.1, 4 axes visible
                            

                            This also provides a bypass until this is fixed.

                            Delta / Kossel printer fanatic

                            HWWundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • HWWundefined
                              HWW @Danal
                              last edited by

                              @Danal A workaround solution until things get a proper fix!! Fantastic. I was just about to ask what your day to day config looks like since in the example from before it E got overwritten but you had a working readout from your day to day.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Danalundefined
                                Danal @HWW
                                last edited by

                                @HWW said in Y axis moving when trying to move Z axis with multiple Z motors:

                                @Danal Triple motor Z also overwrote the E mapping

                                You are correct!!!

                                And I just looked in my actual config.g, and I'd separated the extruders because this is a toolchanger and I'm adding tools one at a time:

                                ; Axis to driver mapping
                                M584 X0 Y1 U2 Z3:4:5        ; X and Y for CoreXY.  U for toolchanger lock. Z has three drivers for kinematic bed suspension. 
                                M584 E1.0:1.1               ; Extruders for four tools. 
                                

                                Man, a bullet dodged a few weeks back. That would have been VERY frustrating when I was trying to figure out a bunch of other stuff as well...!

                                Delta / Kossel printer fanatic

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • HWWundefined
                                  HWW
                                  last edited by

                                  I have added this as an issue to the github tracker
                                  https://github.com/dc42/RepRapFirmware/issues/345

                                  HWW-GS created this issue in dc42/RepRapFirmware

                                  closed M584 Multi Axis/Motor Mapping Error #345

                                  dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • dc42undefined
                                    dc42 administrators @HWW
                                    last edited by

                                    @HWW said in Y axis moving when trying to move Z axis with multiple Z motors:

                                    I have added this as an issue to the github tracker
                                    https://github.com/dc42/RepRapFirmware/issues/345

                                    It's probably a DSF issue not a RRF issue, because it doesn't happen when the Duet 3 is run in standalone mode.

                                    Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                    Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                    http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                    dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • dc42undefined
                                      dc42 administrators @dc42
                                      last edited by

                                      It was an issue in RRF code that is only used when communicating with the SBC. Will be fixed in RRF3.0RC2.

                                      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA