• Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login
Duet3D Logo Duet3D
  • Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login

Pressure Advance seems to not be working.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
Tuning and tweaking
8
83
6.7k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • undefined
    Samuel235 @Phaedrux
    last edited by 30 Dec 2019, 20:49

    @Phaedrux - What printer would be a good test here, would just a simple cube be enough to test if its working or not, not looking to test how good its working, just that it is working...

    undefined 1 Reply Last reply 30 Dec 2019, 20:58 Reply Quote 0
    • undefined
      Phaedrux Moderator @Samuel235
      last edited by 30 Dec 2019, 20:58

      @Samuel235 A cube would probably be alright. A benchy makes for a good test since it has a range of move types and areas to highlight flaws.

      Since the issue we are trying to highlight is likely involving retraction and pressure advance, a simple XYZ cube scaled up a bit would be a good choice. Slightly more complex than a 4 sided cube but not as complex as a benchy and still fast to print.

      xyzCalibration_cube.stl

      Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

      undefined 1 Reply Last reply 31 Dec 2019, 12:38 Reply Quote 0
      • undefined
        Samuel235 @Phaedrux
        last edited by 31 Dec 2019, 12:38

        @Phaedrux - Thank you for including the .stl for me. I will get to that tonight or tomorrow morning (UK Based).

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • undefined
          Samuel235
          last edited by Samuel235 1 Jan 2020, 07:26 1 Jan 2020, 07:23

          Morning all,

          I can confirm that PA now seems to be working after a change of extruder motor current, I assume it was skipping steps due to this. I'm going to continue further today to calibrate PA but I have just ran a XYZ Cube at 150% size and got awesome results from it, with a PA value of 0.22. I have included the information below that I said I would gather.

          I do see some hiccups @Phaedrux, but I have done a quick research through this forum and can see that its not really an issue unless you are seeing around 50 per 200mm, is that correct?

          • M572 before PA enabled:
          M572
          Extruder pressure advance 0.000
          • M122 before PA enabled:
          M122
          === Diagnostics ===
          RepRapFirmware for Duet 2 WiFi/Ethernet version 2.03 running on Duet WiFi 1.02 or later + DueX5
          Board ID: 08DGM-956GU-DJMSN-6J1F4-3SJ6N-1BNBF
          Used output buffers: 5 of 24 (20 max)
          === RTOS ===
          Static ram: 25680
          Dynamic ram: 94256 of which 308 recycled
          Exception stack ram used: 596
          Never used ram: 10232
          Tasks: NETWORK(ready,524) HEAT(blocked,1236) DUEX(suspended,156) MAIN(running,1668) IDLE(ready,160)
          Owned mutexes:
          === Platform ===
          Last reset 22:11:00 ago, cause: power up
          Last software reset at 2019-12-23 18:30, reason: User, spinning module GCodes, available RAM 10304 bytes (slot 1)
          Software reset code 0x0003 HFSR 0x00000000 CFSR 0x00000000 ICSR 0x0441f000 BFAR 0xe000ed38 SP 0xffffffff Task 0x4e49414d
          Error status: 16
          Free file entries: 10
          SD card 0 detected, interface speed: 20.0MBytes/sec
          SD card longest block write time: 0.0ms, max retries 0
          MCU temperature: min 48.9, current 52.3, max 55.6
          Supply voltage: min 24.0, current 24.3, max 24.6, under voltage events: 0, over voltage events: 0, power good: yes
          Driver 0: standstill, SG min/max 0/1023
          Driver 1: standstill, SG min/max 0/1023
          Driver 2: standstill, SG min/max not available
          Driver 3: standstill, SG min/max 0/1023
          Driver 4: standstill, SG min/max not available
          Driver 5: standstill, SG min/max 8/252
          Driver 6: standstill, SG min/max 34/260
          Driver 7: standstill, SG min/max 31/250
          Driver 8: standstill, SG min/max 0/266
          Driver 9: standstill, SG min/max not available
          Date/time: 2019-12-31 18:36:04
          Cache data hit count 4294967295
          Slowest loop: 113.77ms; fastest: 0.08ms
          I2C nak errors 0, send timeouts 0, receive timeouts 0, finishTimeouts 0, resets 0
          === Move ===
          Hiccups: 0, FreeDm: 169, MinFreeDm: 146, MaxWait: 0ms
          Bed compensation in use: mesh, comp offset 0.000
          === DDARing ===
          Scheduled moves: 0, completed moves: 0, StepErrors: 0, LaErrors: 0, Underruns: 0, 0
          === Heat ===
          Bed heaters = 0 -1 -1 -1, chamberHeaters = -1 -1
          Heater 0 is on, I-accum = 0.5
          Heater 1 is on, I-accum = 0.5
          === GCodes ===
          Segments left: 0
          Stack records: 4 allocated, 0 in use
          Movement lock held by null
          http is idle in state(s) 0
          telnet is idle in state(s) 0
          file is idle in state(s) 0
          serial is idle in state(s) 0
          aux is idle in state(s) 0
          daemon is idle in state(s) 0
          queue is idle in state(s) 0
          autopause is idle in state(s) 0
          Code queue is empty.
          === Network ===
          Slowest loop: 200.53ms; fastest: 0.08ms
          Responder states: HTTP(0) HTTP(0) HTTP(0) HTTP(0) FTP(0) Telnet(0) Telnet(0)
          HTTP sessions: 1 of 8
          - WiFi -
          Network state is running
          WiFi module is connected to access point
          Failed messages: pending 0, notready 0, noresp 1
          WiFi firmware version 1.23
          WiFi MAC address XXXXXXXX
          WiFi Vcc 3.32, reset reason Turned on by main processor
          WiFi flash size 4194304, free heap 24400
          WiFi IP address XXXXXXXX
          WiFi signal strength -55dBm, reconnections 0, sleep mode modem
          Socket states: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
          • M572 after PA enabled, value of 0.22:
          M572
          Extruder pressure advance: 0.220
          • M122 after PA enabled, value of 0.22:
          M122
          === Diagnostics ===
          RepRapFirmware for Duet 2 WiFi/Ethernet version 2.03 running on Duet WiFi 1.02 or later + DueX5
          Board ID: 08DGM-956GU-DJMSN-6J1F4-3SJ6N-1BNBF
          Used output buffers: 5 of 24 (20 max)
          === RTOS ===
          Static ram: 25680
          Dynamic ram: 94256 of which 308 recycled
          Exception stack ram used: 492
          Never used ram: 10336
          Tasks: NETWORK(ready,524) HEAT(blocked,1236) DUEX(suspended,156) MAIN(running,1668) IDLE(ready,160)
          Owned mutexes:
          === Platform ===
          Last reset 06:31:07 ago, cause: software
          Last software reset at 2019-12-31 18:44, reason: User, spinning module GCodes, available RAM 10232 bytes (slot 2)
          Software reset code 0x0003 HFSR 0x00000000 CFSR 0x00000000 ICSR 0x0441f000 BFAR 0xe000ed38 SP 0xffffffff Task 0x4e49414d
          Error status: 16
          Free file entries: 10
          SD card 0 detected, interface speed: 20.0MBytes/sec
          SD card longest block write time: 0.0ms, max retries 0
          MCU temperature: min 40.9, current 41.0, max 57.7
          Supply voltage: min 23.9, current 24.5, max 24.6, under voltage events: 0, over voltage events: 0, power good: yes
          Driver 0: standstill, SG min/max 0/1023
          Driver 1: standstill, SG min/max 0/1023
          Driver 2: standstill, SG min/max not available
          Driver 3: standstill, SG min/max 0/1023
          Driver 4: standstill, SG min/max not available
          Driver 5: standstill, SG min/max 0/253
          Driver 6: standstill, SG min/max 15/257
          Driver 7: standstill, SG min/max 0/252
          Driver 8: standstill, SG min/max 0/261
          Driver 9: standstill, SG min/max not available
          Date/time: 1970-01-01 00:00:00
          Cache data hit count 4294967295
          Slowest loop: 101.62ms; fastest: 0.08ms
          I2C nak errors 0, send timeouts 0, receive timeouts 0, finishTimeouts 0, resets 0
          === Move ===
          Hiccups: 129, FreeDm: 169, MinFreeDm: 146, MaxWait: 0ms
          Bed compensation in use: mesh, comp offset 0.000
          === DDARing ===
          Scheduled moves: 0, completed moves: 0, StepErrors: 0, LaErrors: 0, Underruns: 0, 0
          === Heat ===
          Bed heaters = 0 -1 -1 -1, chamberHeaters = -1 -1
          Heater 0 is on, I-accum = 0.0
          Heater 1 is on, I-accum = 0.6
          === GCodes ===
          Segments left: 0
          Stack records: 4 allocated, 0 in use
          Movement lock held by null
          http is idle in state(s) 0
          telnet is idle in state(s) 0
          file is idle in state(s) 0
          serial is idle in state(s) 0
          aux is idle in state(s) 0
          daemon is idle in state(s) 0
          queue is idle in state(s) 0
          autopause is idle in state(s) 0
          Code queue is empty.
          === Network ===
          Slowest loop: 200.37ms; fastest: 0.08ms
          Responder states: HTTP(0) HTTP(0) HTTP(0) HTTP(0) FTP(0) Telnet(0) Telnet(0)
          HTTP sessions: 1 of 8
          - WiFi -
          Network state is running
          WiFi module is connected to access point
          Failed messages: pending 0, notready 0, noresp 7
          WiFi firmware version 1.23
          WiFi MAC address XXXXXXXX
          WiFi Vcc 3.33, reset reason Turned on by main processor
          WiFi flash size 4194304, free heap 24400
          WiFi IP address XXXXXXXX
          WiFi signal strength -55dBm, reconnections 0, sleep mode modem
          Socket states: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

          Thanks,
          Sam.

          undefined undefined 2 Replies Last reply 1 Jan 2020, 07:37 Reply Quote 0
          • undefined
            zapta @Samuel235
            last edited by 1 Jan 2020, 07:37

            @Samuel235 said in Pressure Advance seems to not be working.:

            got awesome results from it, with a PA value of 0.22

            Is this a direct extruder or bowden?

            undefined 1 Reply Last reply 1 Jan 2020, 07:52 Reply Quote 0
            • undefined
              Samuel235 @zapta
              last edited by 1 Jan 2020, 07:52

              @zapta Its bowden, around 650mm bowden length.

              undefined 1 Reply Last reply 1 Jan 2020, 17:34 Reply Quote 0
              • undefined
                Phaedrux Moderator @Samuel235
                last edited by 1 Jan 2020, 16:27

                @Samuel235 said in Pressure Advance seems to not be working.:

                Hiccups: 129

                I wouldn't be too concerned by this over the course of a print.

                Do you happen to have Z hop on retract enabled?

                You can do more fine grained testing to try and pin down when the hiccups are occuring. Every time you send M122 it resets the counter, so you can send it at the start, send it after homing, send it after the first layer, etc. and eventually you'll get an idea of where and when they are occuring.

                Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                undefined 1 Reply Last reply 1 Jan 2020, 16:45 Reply Quote 0
                • undefined
                  Samuel235 @Phaedrux
                  last edited by 1 Jan 2020, 16:45

                  @Phaedrux - I was doing this while it was printing also, it seems to be consistent on most layers if i remember correctly. I'm not currently running Z Hop, no.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • undefined
                    zapta @Samuel235
                    last edited by 1 Jan 2020, 17:34

                    @Samuel235 said in Pressure Advance seems to not be working.:

                    @zapta Its bowden, around 650mm bowden length.

                    0.22 for a 650mm bowden is very low, good for you. I got > 1.0 with 600mm 1.9mm capricon bowden and lowered it to 0.15 when switched to direct drive.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • undefined
                      Samuel235
                      last edited by 1 Jan 2020, 17:38

                      I'm currently running some tests to attempt to calibrate it. I'm currently using CURA so I'm unable to force a seam to be in the middle of a flat face, so i'm using a cone print to put a seam on the face and to change PA as the print goes and then to find the best section. I'd be interested to know the calibration method you all face, do you all go for the python script that is floating around?

                      undefined 1 Reply Last reply 1 Jan 2020, 17:48 Reply Quote 0
                      • undefined
                        Phaedrux Moderator @Samuel235
                        last edited by Phaedrux 1 Jan 2020, 17:55 1 Jan 2020, 17:48

                        @Samuel235 said in Pressure Advance seems to not be working.:

                        I'm currently using CURA so I'm unable to force a seam to be in the middle of a flat face

                        It can be done in Cura.
                        https://ultimaker.com/en/resources/52343-shell

                        The options may be hidden by default. Use the gear icon on the shell heading to see any hidden options.

                        Z seam alignment - User specified
                        Z seam position - back
                        Seam corner preference - none

                        Produces the desired result. That's in 4.4.1. In older versions there was an X and Y position you could specify. The setting is still there in the settings visibility filter, but it's not being shown and I'm not sure what's blocking it. Regardless, setting it to back, front, left, or right works to align it to a face.

                        Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                        undefined 1 Reply Last reply 1 Jan 2020, 18:16 Reply Quote 0
                        • undefined
                          Samuel235 @Phaedrux
                          last edited by 1 Jan 2020, 18:16

                          @Phaedrux - Im on 4.2.1 and the XY position will not put it in the middle of a flat face for me and a few others I chat to. I will try their update shortly to see if that new option works for me.

                          undefined 1 Reply Last reply 1 Jan 2020, 18:27 Reply Quote 0
                          • undefined
                            Phaedrux Moderator @Samuel235
                            last edited by 1 Jan 2020, 18:27

                            @Samuel235 The corner preference must be none as well.

                            Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • undefined
                              Samuel235
                              last edited by 2 Jan 2020, 07:36

                              I have just updated my Cura, and still facing the same issues:

                              529ff7e2-dd34-4c61-afac-fabf0d4d3d61-image.png

                              Will attempt to find a work around later today using another slicer.

                              undefined 1 Reply Last reply 2 Jan 2020, 17:49 Reply Quote 0
                              • undefined
                                burtoogle
                                last edited by 2 Jan 2020, 07:52

                                Re getting the z-seam in the middle of a flat face using Cura. Well, it can't be done using the UM releases but my Cura builds do now provide that capability. Setting the z-seam to user-defined and seam corner preference to none will enable this feature. You can find my releases at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/s43vqzmi4d2bqe2/AAADdYdSu9iwcKa0Knqgurm4a?dl=0. Please read the README.md file there for more info.

                                Here's an example, you can see the travel moves associated with the z-seam to the left of the middle of the flat area at the botttom of the image.

                                Screenshot_2020-01-02_07-49-20.png

                                undefined 1 Reply Last reply 2 Jan 2020, 17:46 Reply Quote 1
                                • undefined
                                  Phaedrux Moderator @burtoogle
                                  last edited by 2 Jan 2020, 17:46

                                  @burtoogle said in Pressure Advance seems to not be working.:

                                  Well, it can't be done using the UM releases but my Cura builds do now provide that capability.

                                  Just one more reason to use your builds.

                                  @Samuel235 I was going by memory on the settings and didn't realize that the stock Cura does not allow this.

                                  Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • undefined
                                    Phaedrux Moderator @Samuel235
                                    last edited by 2 Jan 2020, 17:49

                                    @Samuel235 For what it's worth, setting the seam to a corner of the cube is also usable, it just makes finding the smoothest transition a little harder. You can also use a cylinder, but then you miss out on the corner bulge tuning.

                                    Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • undefined
                                      Samuel235
                                      last edited by 2 Jan 2020, 22:33

                                      Oh awesome, thank you for including your build @burtoogle!

                                      @Phaedrux - I have been using a cone, I imagine this to be the same as a cylinder for the sake of this test, just the layers would get quicker as they go up, and I ranged from 0.1 to 0.9 PA, I didn't get any change in apperance of the seam at all across the range of PA values unfortunately. I will try with a cube tomorrow to test.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • undefined
                                        Phaedrux Moderator
                                        last edited by 2 Jan 2020, 23:34

                                        A cone might be ok. I think the fact the size is changing as it goes up would make it harder to see the difference in the seam since the layer time is a confounding factor.

                                        The cube is probably the best option for this because you get up to speed over the 100mm length and the corners show the bulge and the seam on the face is clearly visible.

                                        Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • undefined
                                          Samuel235
                                          last edited by 3 Jan 2020, 18:32

                                          Currently printing a 100mm cube with a single skin, no infil. Seam is in the middle of the face at the back with the build of Cura linked above (Thanks @burtoogle). I have PA changing its value from 0.05 to 0.9 in 0.05 increments every 25 layers. Will see how this turns out.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          15 out of 83
                                          • First post
                                            15/83
                                            Last post
                                          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA