• Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login
Duet3D Logo Duet3D
  • Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login

Delta z height AC Predator

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
Duet Hardware and wiring
4
36
1.5k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • undefined
    jay_s_uk
    last edited by 11 Mar 2020, 09:34

    One thing I have noticed is your endstop adjustments in M666 are a lot larger than mine

    M666 X0.081 Y0.238 Z-0.319 A0.00 B0.00
    

    What 'S' value are you using at the end of your bed file?

    Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

    undefined 1 Reply Last reply 11 Mar 2020, 09:45 Reply Quote 0
    • undefined
      Gary @jay_s_uk
      last edited by 11 Mar 2020, 09:45

      @jay_s_uk
      I'm sure it's your bed file with S6

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • undefined
        jay_s_uk
        last edited by 11 Mar 2020, 10:00

        Try overriding the M665 and M666 values and then reprobe.
        I.e. resend whats in config and then probe

        Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

        undefined 1 Reply Last reply 11 Mar 2020, 10:05 Reply Quote 0
        • undefined
          Gary @jay_s_uk
          last edited by Gary 3 Nov 2020, 10:08 11 Mar 2020, 10:05

          @jay_s_uk
          Yeah I did that before. I deleted config override and re-probed, but I've noticed that re-probing overwrites the M665 and M666 values in the override file. Worth another try though. When you said your endstop adjustments were smaller than mine by how much?

          undefined 1 Reply Last reply 15 Mar 2020, 13:34 Reply Quote 0
          • undefined
            jay_s_uk
            last edited by 11 Mar 2020, 10:40

            @Gary

            The code I included is my endstop M666.

            As you can see, my X is 0.081. Yours is -6.790

            Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • undefined
              jay_s_uk
              last edited by 11 Mar 2020, 10:44

              I don't know how yours can be so different unless the original owner messed with the little metal flags on the top of the carriages.

              Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

              undefined 1 Reply Last reply 11 Mar 2020, 11:15 Reply Quote 0
              • undefined
                Gary @jay_s_uk
                last edited by 11 Mar 2020, 11:15

                @jay_s_uk
                The flags look/feel the same as my other stock machine. I'll need to get to the endstops as that's a huge difference.

                Just done another re-probe and similar results.
                M665 L440.000:440.000:440.000 R224.513 H456.388 B185.0 X-0.646 Y-0.364 Z0.000
                M666 X-6.930 Y3.322 Z3.607 A0.00 B0.00

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • undefined
                  jay_s_uk
                  last edited by 11 Mar 2020, 11:24

                  I would investigate your X endstop then as its 10mm different to your Y and Z enstops

                  Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                  undefined 2 Replies Last reply 11 Mar 2020, 11:38 Reply Quote 0
                  • undefined
                    Gary @jay_s_uk
                    last edited by Gary 3 Nov 2020, 11:39 11 Mar 2020, 11:38

                    @jay_s_uk
                    Yes. Got my finger under all of them and one is maybe a 0.5/1mm higher, not 10. Disassembly required. Never seen an endstop could it be upside down?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • undefined
                      Gary @jay_s_uk
                      last edited by Gary 3 Nov 2020, 12:07 11 Mar 2020, 12:02

                      @jay_s_uk
                      I got the error " Warning: the height map was loaded when the current Z=0 datum was not determined probing. This may result in a height offset." Just wondered if the problem could be anything like the link below?

                      https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/10835/z-0-datum-was-not-determined-probing/3

                      I can kind of see that having both a Z endstop switch and a Z probe could cause a problem, as the z tower is not the z height.
                      Mine Firmware is: RepRapFirmware for Duet 2 WiFi/Ethernet 2.04 (2019-11-01b1)

                      Have you got the same firmware version?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • undefined
                        jay_s_uk
                        last edited by 11 Mar 2020, 12:19

                        @Gary

                        I wouldn't worry about the message around the height map just yet.

                        If you're going to stick with RRF2 for the moment, I would be upgrading to 2.05.1
                        I'm on the latest RRF3.01 release and I use conditional gcode in my bed file.

                        You need both a Z stop and a Z probe. The Z stop is set at the maximum end to signify its at the top of the tower. The firmware knows that the Z stop is for the Z tower and will treat it accordingly.

                        Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                        undefined 1 Reply Last reply 11 Mar 2020, 12:34 Reply Quote 0
                        • undefined
                          Gary @jay_s_uk
                          last edited by Gary 3 Nov 2020, 12:35 11 Mar 2020, 12:34

                          @jay_s_uk
                          Will update the firmware. It was just a thought as X-6.790 and my probe offset of 5.52 gives 1.27mm which would correlate roughly to what I felt with my finger maybe.

                          undefined 1 Reply Last reply 11 Mar 2020, 12:52 Reply Quote 0
                          • undefined
                            jay_s_uk @Gary
                            last edited by 11 Mar 2020, 12:52

                            @Gary

                            What do you mean your probe offset is 5.52? In your config, your Z probe offset is 17.656

                            Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                            undefined 1 Reply Last reply 11 Mar 2020, 13:19 Reply Quote 0
                            • undefined
                              Gary @jay_s_uk
                              last edited by Gary 3 Nov 2020, 13:20 11 Mar 2020, 13:19

                              @jay_s_uk
                              Sorry I meant initial hot end paper touch before using probe. z=0 at this height.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • undefined
                                Gary
                                last edited by Gary 13 Mar 2020, 12:49

                                Updated, checked all endstops/tabs and they all look okay. Similar distances and wiring the same. Just done another probe and config override as below.

                                M665 L440.000:440.000:440.000 R227.000 H456.747 B185.0 X0.000 Y0.000 Z0.000
                                M666 X0.000 Y0.000 Z0.000 A0.00 B0.00

                                That can't be right all zeros. I did notice that the first probe was not in the center of the bed - 10ish mm out.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • undefined
                                  Gary
                                  last edited by 15 Mar 2020, 13:13

                                  Hi, Sorted at some point the X belt had twisted with the non-toothed side running on the stepper. I didn’t even notice when checking the stepper grub screws. I couldn’t see the belt twist as it’s slightly recessed on the machine, but I noticed when looking closely at the carriage and tabs. Really noticeable when you manually move the carriage up and down. It makes sense now as when I did a HomeDelta quite often, but not all the time, the interface would report not all axis homed and they weren’t. I just thought it was an annoying “feature” that would sometimes happen and I would have to click Home again. The board was turning the stepper the 490mm distance I have in my HomeDelta and not triggering the end stop giving the error. Also when doing probing from high up the results were inconsistent – belt slippage. Down low with slow probes it was okay. After a Home the X and Y values were not zero on the interface and when touching bed the hot end was not centred on the bed. Now to change the belts and somehow fix the bed which got smashed at the edge when the Perspex lid hit it!
                                  M665 L440.000:440.000:440.000 R226.630 H455.788 B185.0 X0.093 Y0.750 Z0.000
                                  M666 X-0.012 Y-0.045 Z0.057 A0.00 B0.00

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • undefined
                                    dc42 administrators @Gary
                                    last edited by 15 Mar 2020, 13:34

                                    @Gary said in Delta z height AC Predator:

                                    @jay_s_uk
                                    Yeah I did that before. I deleted config override and re-probed, but I've noticed that re-probing overwrites the M665 and M666 values in the override file. Worth another try though. When you said your endstop adjustments were smaller than mine by how much?

                                    It will only do that if you have M500 in your bed.g file, or you send M500 manually. I do not advise using M500 in bed.g.

                                    Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                    Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                    http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    29 out of 36
                                    • First post
                                      29/36
                                      Last post
                                    Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA