G29 G32 😱
-
@Phaedrux hello agree so here is fine. can you please tell me if my start script is correct?
-
Yes that looks like it should work
-
-
I'm afraid the issue is with the calibration and mesh creation being inaccurate due to mechanical issues. Some things software can't correct for.
-
I also tried to lower 40% of the values in the map where I highlighted in the photo above ...
without success I have not noticed any difference -
and how is it possible then that without the map doing only the G32 and putting a thickness of paper folded in 2 under the plate I adjust only the height print well
-
If it's printing well without G29, why use G29?
The combination of probe offset from the nozzle and effector tilt varying with position can lead to probed points being inaccurate.
-
yes I understand but something should change if I change the values of the map manually instead nothing changes ok thanks for everything I keep the thickness of cards under the plate
-
-
-
-
@Phaedrux
G29 S1 P "heightmap.csv also delete this from simplify3d start script? bI'm sorry if I write badly I use google translate -
Just delete the
P "heightmap.csv"
part from the start script. Leave G29 S1 intact. -
ok
-
@Phaedrux nothing has changed
-
Then I'm all out of ideas and we're back to improving the mechanics. That's the limit of my delta insight unfortunately.
-
hello can you tell me if I have to set the offset of my extruder with respect to the center of the effector? maybe that's why the map doesn't compensate well
-
Do you mean the offset of the probe?
-
@Phaedrux no my titan aero is not in the center of my effector so the nozzle is not in the center of the effector
-
to make you better understand when I go down the z to 0 leffector and centered on my plate. but I nozzle no