G29 G32 😱
-
-
I'm afraid the issue is with the calibration and mesh creation being inaccurate due to mechanical issues. Some things software can't correct for.
-
I also tried to lower 40% of the values in the map where I highlighted in the photo above ...
without success I have not noticed any difference -
and how is it possible then that without the map doing only the G32 and putting a thickness of paper folded in 2 under the plate I adjust only the height print well
-
If it's printing well without G29, why use G29?
The combination of probe offset from the nozzle and effector tilt varying with position can lead to probed points being inaccurate.
-
yes I understand but something should change if I change the values of the map manually instead nothing changes ok thanks for everything I keep the thickness of cards under the plate
-
-
-
-
@Phaedrux
G29 S1 P "heightmap.csv also delete this from simplify3d start script? bI'm sorry if I write badly I use google translate -
Just delete the
P "heightmap.csv"
part from the start script. Leave G29 S1 intact. -
ok
-
@Phaedrux nothing has changed
-
Then I'm all out of ideas and we're back to improving the mechanics. That's the limit of my delta insight unfortunately.
-
hello can you tell me if I have to set the offset of my extruder with respect to the center of the effector? maybe that's why the map doesn't compensate well
-
Do you mean the offset of the probe?
-
@Phaedrux no my titan aero is not in the center of my effector so the nozzle is not in the center of the effector
-
to make you better understand when I go down the z to 0 leffector and centered on my plate. but I nozzle no
-
That is interesting. I'm not sure, but I think you could use the G10 tool offset to better define where your nozzle actually is in relation to the center of the effector. This may actually help your G29 performance because the probe offset assumes that it's offset from the nozzle.
-
@Phaedrux ok i will try today. I will let you know