Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    RRF 2.03 pressure advance causes 20% overextrusion

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Firmware installation
    15
    116
    6.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • botundefined
      bot @jschall
      last edited by bot

      @jschall I do not have access to a linux machine, and have never built an app image... I've only built this on windows.

      However, I found the SuperSlicer (fork of PS) build instructions fantastic.

      https://github.com/supermerill/SuperSlicer/blob/master/doc/How to build - Linux et al.md

      Give that a shot.

      *not actually a robot

      jschallundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jschallundefined
        jschall @bot
        last edited by

        @bot said in RRF 2.03 pressure advance causes 20% overextrusion:

        However, I found the SuperSlicer (fork of PS) build instructions fantastic.

        That's just identical to the PrusaSlicer build instructions.

        Hmm, even a windows build would be fine. Can run it under a VM.

        botundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • botundefined
          bot @jschall
          last edited by

          @jschall here's the windows build I run day-to-day:

          https://github.com/n8bot/PrusaSlicer/releases/tag/v2.3.0-alpha0-n8pmis

          It's almost the latest PS master branch, but the latest changes they made to the master branch aren't useful so those aren't included yet. (waiting for the seam painter to actually work, not just paint meaninglessly)

          *not actually a robot

          jschallundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jschallundefined
            jschall @bot
            last edited by

            @bot What's the difference between that and the n8_precision_minus_infill_support branch?

            botundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • botundefined
              bot @jschall
              last edited by bot

              That release is the n8_precision_minus_infill_support branch.

              I copied and pasted the description from a previous release hastily, so it might have said the wrong thing.

              The previous releases work fine, too, but this one enables better support placement (PS ignores some "thin" support regions which prevents some support from appearing) and also prevents the solid infill from "auto-adjusting" the width by ~1 micron, which was annoying in some cases but not important to "fix."

              There are other releases there, too.

              The two main things I think you'll like are the resolution change, and the decimal precision changes. Fixes extrusion rate problems.

              Edit: Also, you might need some .DLLs from MS Visual Studio redistributable. Let me know if/which ones you need I can send them too.

              *not actually a robot

              jschallundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jschallundefined
                jschall @bot
                last edited by

                @bot ah ok.
                It is complaining about vcruntime140_1.dll, but I've already installed the visual c++ 2015 redistributable...

                botundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • botundefined
                  bot @jschall
                  last edited by bot

                  @jschall Yup, that's the one. See this post: https://forum.duet3d.com/post/170901

                  I uploaded the .dll for someone previously, but it's named as .stl. just rename it .dll and put it in the prusaslicer folder or wherever.

                  I also just updated the release to include that .dll. I hope that doesn't break a EULA. oh well.

                  *not actually a robot

                  jschallundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jschallundefined
                    jschall @bot
                    last edited by

                    @bot
                    Got it running. Doesn't work in VirtualBox anyway because no opengl 2.0+ support. So, I ran it in WINE and it works fine. Extrusion amount looks about right.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Edgars Batnaundefined
                      Edgars Batna @jschall
                      last edited by Edgars Batna

                      @jschall said in RRF 2.03 pressure advance causes 20% overextrusion:

                      @bot I tried to build PrusaSlicer before and gave up because of ridiculously huge numbers of dependencies on cutting edge versions of everything.

                      They have "noob guide" now. It's basically how it should be built, not really for noobs, but for anyone with a little bit of sanity left. I'm wondering why they even bother with having a guide; the steps can be semi-easily compressed into a batch file. Maybe they take pride in memorizing random things...

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jschallundefined
                        jschall
                        last edited by

                        Good to see "Detect thin walls" still sucks just as much as ever.

                        Phaedruxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • botundefined
                          bot
                          last edited by

                          Haha. Yeah. There's lots of "fun" things going on in PrusaSlicer. There definitely needs to be a huge refactoring, IMO. Many features need to be removed, or re-considered in the context of other newer features.

                          *not actually a robot

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Phaedruxundefined
                            Phaedrux Moderator @jschall
                            last edited by

                            @jschall said in RRF 2.03 pressure advance causes 20% overextrusion:

                            Good to see "Detect thin walls" still sucks just as much as ever.

                            Still better than Cura. 😀

                            Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                            jschallundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • jschallundefined
                              jschall @Phaedrux
                              last edited by

                              @Phaedrux Really? Cura seems to do way way better than PrusaSlicer when slicing things with thin walls. Also it has support for coasting which is super important on my ender3 v2s that don't frigging work with linear advance...

                              I just hate Cura's interface. Hard to be worse.

                              Phaedruxundefined Vetiundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • oliofundefined
                                oliof
                                last edited by

                                Superslicer has something like coasting iirc

                                <>RatRig V-Minion Fly Super5Pro RRF<> V-Core 3.1 IDEX k*****r <> RatRig V-Minion SKR 2 Marlin<>

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Phaedruxundefined
                                  Phaedrux Moderator @jschall
                                  last edited by

                                  @jschall I find Cura falls apart faster than super Slicer on thin walls. In Cura you're forced to use 2 walls. The master build of Cura has the option of trying to replace one of those wall passes with a travel move, but it rarely seems to work well. At least the gap fill in Slic3r has a lot more leeway with regards to wall thickness. It's true that on the really thin side the walls just don't get extruded at all, but it seems to be a lot more forgiving. Cura will print the thin walls but it's usually well over extruded.

                                  Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                                  jschallundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Vetiundefined
                                    Veti @jschall
                                    last edited by

                                    @jschall
                                    have you watched https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W5pPm0lZDE? it mentions the problems with the titans.

                                    jschallundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • jschallundefined
                                      jschall @Phaedrux
                                      last edited by

                                      @Phaedrux Cura has something called "compensate flow" and I think it reduces the flow on one of the two walls so that the total extrusion volume is correct for the wall thickness.

                                      Phaedruxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • Phaedruxundefined
                                        Phaedrux Moderator @jschall
                                        last edited by Phaedrux

                                        @jschall Yes that's the setting I'm thinking of. Doesn't it seem silly to replace a one of the walls with a travel move though? It's still taking the time to move around the entire perimeter it's just not extruding anything. Not very elegant.

                                        For best results it also wants you to use outer wall first, which means overhangs suffer in addition to the extra ooze from the empty travel moves.

                                        Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                                        jschallundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • jschallundefined
                                          jschall @Veti
                                          last edited by jschall

                                          @Veti

                                          Yeah totally agree.

                                          Bowden is fking stupid. The whole premise of bowden is to REMOVE a motor that needs to output LESS THAN 1W OF MECHANICAL POWER in order to SAVE MASS on something that weighs in at like 500 grams. Hey, here's an idea: how about instead of that, we stop using half-pound 1970s-era stepper motors?

                                          jschallundefined deckingmanundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • jschallundefined
                                            jschall @Phaedrux
                                            last edited by

                                            @Phaedrux said in RRF 2.03 pressure advance causes 20% overextrusion:

                                            Doesn't it seem silly to replace a one of the walls with a travel move though? It's still taking the time to move around the entire perimeter it's just not extruding anything.

                                            Not really, because the only case where it isn't extruding anything is the case where the wall thickness is exactly equal to the line thickness. But yeah, could be optimized.

                                            What slicer does the absolute best with thin walls? I bought Simplify3D and was horribly disappointed. Cura so far seems to do the best job overall.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA