Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    What’s the stance on RRF on none Duet boards?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    7
    28
    2.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jay_s_ukundefined
      jay_s_uk @zapta
      last edited by

      @zapta

      I know fly/mellow uses original unused STM32F4 processors. Prices have also started to raise a lot recently.

      We believe BTT is using secondhand STM32F4 processors (hence the slightly cheaper prices) but we can't substantiate that either way.

      Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • zaptaundefined
        zapta @jay_s_uk
        last edited by zapta

        @jay_s_uk said in What’s the stance on RRF on none Duet boards?:

        SKR 2 has 5 replaceable...

        I am not sure what I think about the replaceable vs soldered. On one hand, the replaceable are easier to replace when something goes wrong but on the other hand the connector is another thing that can go wrong and overall it looks as a 'ghetto' design. 😉

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • zaptaundefined
          zapta @jay_s_uk
          last edited by zapta

          @jay_s_uk, the new rave in Chinese boards is the Fysetc Spider. STM32F446 with 8 replaceable TMC2209 for $60 shipped. It has 5V and 12V buck converters for external devices and marlin and klipper support, and got design input from the Voron dev team with the goal to replace the two SKRs. I don't see anything about a wifi dongle.

          https://wiki.fysetc.com/Spider/

          What's the process of getting RRF support for a new board like this? Is it typically done by the vendor or by the community?

          EDIT: The wiki page says this: "As RRF firmware requires more than 512KB of Flash space, the Spider equipped with 446 cannot meet its requirements. So Spider has another version dedicated to running RRF firmware, which uses STM32F407VGT6 MCU."

          jay_s_ukundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jay_s_ukundefined
            jay_s_uk @zapta
            last edited by jay_s_uk

            @zapta that board won't get added in its current form.
            They've chosen an MCU with only 512kb of flash and the firmware as it stands is already bigger than that for a wifi build
            They are releasing a 407 version I believe. Lets just hope they choose the right processor

            Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

            zaptaundefined dc42undefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • zaptaundefined
              zapta @jay_s_uk
              last edited by

              @jay_s_uk said in What’s the stance on RRF on none Duet boards?:

              Lets just hope they choose the right processor

              Just posted an EDIT. The RRF processor is STM32F407VGT6

              jay_s_ukundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jay_s_ukundefined
                jay_s_uk @zapta
                last edited by

                @zapta thats the same processor used on the Fly-E3, E3-Pro, SKR-RRF-E3 and SKR 2.
                The next challenge is getting the information for it or even getting a board for testing.

                Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                zaptaundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • zaptaundefined
                  zapta @jay_s_uk
                  last edited by zapta

                  @jay_s_uk, when I click on Compatible Boards at https://www.reprapfirmware.org/ it shows only Duet3d boards.

                  Have you tried discussing with reprapfirmware.org owners (Duet3d?) having a more vendor neutral page that lists all boards?

                  The boundary between RRF and Duet3d is confusing to me.

                  jay_s_ukundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jay_s_ukundefined
                    jay_s_uk @zapta
                    last edited by

                    @zapta
                    Never even thought about that page.
                    I would have to approach duet3d about it.

                    Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • dc42undefined
                      dc42 administrators @jay_s_uk
                      last edited by

                      @jay_s_uk said in What’s the stance on RRF on none Duet boards?:

                      @zapta that board won't get added in its current form.
                      They've chosen an MCU with only 512kb of flash and the firmware as it stands is already bigger than that for a wifi build

                      Bigger than 512kb? Sounds odd to me. Duet2CombinedFirmware for the Duet WiFi and Ethernet is currently 500kb and has the code for both WiFi and Ethernet included. It's only the Duet 3 and 3 Mini builds with CAN support that are bigger than 512kb.

                      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                      jay_s_ukundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jay_s_ukundefined
                        jay_s_uk @dc42
                        last edited by

                        @dc42 Yep, this is from Andy

                        The latest development WiFi build (which by default loads at address 0x08008000 (so we allow 32K for the bootloader) already uses flash memory up to 0x0808fecc which is a total of 543Kb of flash which means a total size (with the bootloader) of 575kBytes.
                        

                        Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                        dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • dc42undefined
                          dc42 administrators @jay_s_uk
                          last edited by

                          @jay_s_uk I see, it's because 32kb is already taken up by the bootloader.

                          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                          jay_s_ukundefined gloomyandyundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • jay_s_ukundefined
                            jay_s_uk @dc42
                            last edited by

                            @dc42 yep

                            I also don't know how much the board.txt functionality and multiple board support takes up.
                            We also produce separate builds for wifi and SBC

                            Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • gloomyandyundefined
                              gloomyandy @dc42
                              last edited by

                              @dc42 There is a further 32K that is used for NVM emulation to hold the stack/registers after a reset. This is rather wasteful but on the chips we currently support not really an issue.

                              Some other things are also a little different in that we have additional code to support any mixture of TMC2208/2209/5160 drivers. A software based UART (for TMC drivers) and software SPI. I'm also pretty sure that our CoreN2G has rahter more in it than strictly needed.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                              • achrnundefined achrn referenced this topic
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA