Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Z offset on Inductive sensors

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Tuning and tweaking
    4
    21
    942
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • fcwiltundefined
      fcwilt @Tinchus
      last edited by

      @tinchus said in Z offset on Inductive sensors:

      the current reduction is only for the probing step, then current is retored to 100%

      Out of curiosity why do you reduce the current?

      Thanks.

      Frederick

      Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

      Tinchusundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Tinchusundefined
        Tinchus @fcwilt
        last edited by

        @fcwilt because I planned the printer to have eough power to have all the build plate full of print, and since it is a big volumen, theoretically I can have like 15 kgs if I print metal. So Z motors have enough power to move that mass.
        BUT, if something goes wrong, the also have the power to destroy my hotenfd and bend the bed if the printhead crash against the bed at full powwer. By reducing to 30% while homing, if something goes wrong, they will start to loose steps before bending my bed.

        fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • fcwiltundefined
          fcwilt @Tinchus
          last edited by

          @tinchus said in Z offset on Inductive sensors:
          So Z motors have enough power to move that mass.

          BUT, if something goes wrong, the also have the power to destroy my hotenfd and bend the bed

          Wow.

          What steppers are you using?

          Thanks.

          Frederick

          Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Tinchusundefined
            Tinchus @Phaedrux
            last edited by

            @phaedrux This is just from the oven: heighmap with print chamber at 120 degrees celsius:

            bed.png

            fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • fcwiltundefined
              fcwilt @Tinchus
              last edited by

              @tinchus said in Z offset on Inductive sensors:

              This is just from the oven: heighmap with print chamber at 120 degrees celsius:

              bed.png

              That is not good.

              But it does make me feel better about mine. 😉

              At what XY point are you setting the Z=0 datum with G30 prior to creating the heightmap?

              Thanks.

              Frederick

              Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Phaedruxundefined
                Phaedrux Moderator
                last edited by

                That's quite a lot of tilt. On the bright side it looks like the surface itself is mostly flat. Is there anyway you can square the bed and gantry a bit better?

                Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                Tinchusundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Tinchusundefined
                  Tinchus @Phaedrux
                  last edited by

                  @phaedrux What you are looking is the normal deformation an aluinium bed will have under 120 degrees celsius + yes there is some tilt to the front.

                  Phaedruxundefined fcwiltundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Phaedruxundefined
                    Phaedrux Moderator @Tinchus
                    last edited by

                    @tinchus said in Z offset on Inductive sensors:

                    yes there is some tilt to the front.

                    07000efb-f9dd-47e8-8cb9-0dc1c109edd8-image.png

                    Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • fcwiltundefined
                      fcwilt @Tinchus
                      last edited by

                      @tinchus said in Z offset on Inductive sensors:

                      @phaedrux What you are looking is the normal deformation an aluinium bed will have under 120 degrees celsius + yes there is some tilt to the front.

                      If that is "normal" for your setup I think you need to change the design - that is a lot of tilt - you are talking about 7 to 14 layers of compensation required.

                      And the nozzle-to-bed relationship will likely have a negative effect on print quality.

                      Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                      Tinchusundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Tinchusundefined
                        Tinchus @fcwilt
                        last edited by

                        @fcwilt You are loosing the focus: compensation is working OK. The problem is the Z offset reported, is not realistic.

                        fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Phaedruxundefined
                          Phaedrux Moderator
                          last edited by

                          Try this, when measuring your G30 S-1 after touching down your nozzle to the bed, job the probe so that it's over that same point. If there is enough tilt there will be a difference in height between where the nozzle is and the probe is. Just like the triangle formed by the ski jumper leaving the ramp.

                          Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • fcwiltundefined
                            fcwilt @Tinchus
                            last edited by

                            @tinchus said in Z offset on Inductive sensors:

                            @fcwilt You are loosing the focus: compensation is working OK. The problem is the Z offset reported, is not realistic.

                            What do you mean by realistic?

                            It's accurate so isn't that "real"?

                            Frederick

                            Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA