• Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login
Duet3D Logo Duet3D
  • Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login

Verifying mesh levelling

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
General Discussion
6
71
4.6k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • undefined
    BStump
    last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 01:16

    I am very intrigued by this post where several made scripts for Curs, S3D, and Slicr to probe only the area under the actual print. Not being a coder I need to modify moth the Cura and Simplified #d ones to keep the number of probe points under 400 and not probe less than about 10mm spacing.

    I think this may solve our issues. Not sure how this would be applied when you have a multi part print where ideally it probes under each individually.

    https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/15302/cura-script-to-automatically-probe-only-printed-area

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • undefined
      BStump @Phaedrux
      last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 01:17

      @phaedrux said in Verifying mesh levelling:

      With a bed like that I'd probably leave taper off entirely unless you're more concerned about wear and tear on the z axis. Otherwise try 50mm

      Take a look at this to see if it might fit into your work flow.

      https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/15302/cura-script-to-automatically-probe-only-printed-area

      This way you could maximize the 440 points into the exact area you're printing on, with the downside of needing to probe before each print. Though if the area is smaller you could probably get away with fewer than the full 441.

      Can you also post your config.g again? I can't seem to find it scrolling up. There are potentially improvements we can make to the probing settings.

      Thanks on that, I found it also. Very intriguing. See my comment above.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • undefined
        BStump @Phaedrux
        last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 01:19

        @phaedrux said in Verifying mesh levelling:

        With a bed like that I'd probably leave taper off entirely unless you're more concerned about wear and tear on the z axis. Otherwise try 50mm

        Take a look at this to see if it might fit into your work flow.

        https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/15302/cura-script-to-automatically-probe-only-printed-area

        This way you could maximize the 440 points into the exact area you're printing on, with the downside of needing to probe before each print. Though if the area is smaller you could probably get away with fewer than the full 441.

        Can you also post your config.g again? I can't seem to find it scrolling up. There are potentially improvements we can make to the probing settings.

        ; Configuration file for Duet WiFi (firmware version 3)
        ; executed by the firmware on start-up
        ;
        ; generated by RepRapFirmware Configuration Tool v3.2.3 on Thu Jun 24 2021 09:31:20 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)
        ; General preferences
        G90 ; send absolute coordinates...
        M83 ; ...but relative extruder moves
        M550 P"modix_big_meter" ; set printer name
        ; Network
        M552 P0.0.0.0 S1 ; enable network and acquire dynamic address via DHCP
        M586 P0 S1 ; enable HTTP
        M586 P1 S0 ; disable FTP
        M586 P2 S0 ; disable Telnet
        ; Drives
        M569 P0 S0 ; physical drive 0 X1 reverse
        M569 P1 S1 ; physical drive 1 X2 forward
        M569 P2 R-1 ; Physical drive 2 not used
        M569 P3 S1 ; physical drive 3 E0 forward
        M569 P4 S0 ; physical drive 4 E1 reverse
        ; additional drives on duex5 expansion board
        M569 P5 S0 ; Physical drive 5 Y reverse
        M569 P6 S0 ; Physical drive 6 Z1 (0,1000) reverse
        M569 P7 S0 ; Physical drive 7 Z2 (0,0) reverse
        M569 P8 S0 ; Physical drive 8 Z3 (1000,0) reverse
        M569 P9 S0 ; Physical drive 9 Z4 (1000,1000) reverse
        M584 X0:1 Y5 Z6:7:8:9 E3:4 P3 ; map motors to axis
        M671 X-181:-181:1049:1049 Y1066:-58:-58:1066 S10 ; CCW positions of Z motors
        M350 X16 Y16 Z16 E16 U16 I1 ; Configure microstepping with interpolation
        M92 X100.00 Y100.00 Z2000.00 E412.32 U100.00 ; Set steps per mm
        ;M566 X240 Y360 Z30.00 E120.00 U240 P1 ; Set maximum instantaneous speed changes (mm/min)
        M566 X120 Y360 Z30.00 E120.00 U240 P1 ; Set maximum instantaneous speed changes (mm/min)
        M203 X9000.00 Y9000.00 Z200.00 E1200.00 U9000.00 ; Set maximum speeds (mm/min)
        ;M201 X1000 Y1000 Z120.00 E250.00 U1000 ; Set accelerations (mm/s^2)
        M201 X500 Y1000 Z120.00 E250.00 U1000 ; Set accelerations (mm/s^2)
        M204 P500 T1000 ; Set print and travel accelerations (mm/s^2)
        M906 X1800 Y1800.00 E1000.00 U1800 I30 ; Set motor currents (mA) and motor idle factor in per cent
        M906 Z1800.00 I50 ; Set motor currents (mA) and motor idle factor in per cent
        M84 S60 X Y U E0 E1 ; Set idle timeout - one minute
        ; Axis Limits
        M208 X0 Y0 Z0 U0 S1 ; set axis minima
        M208 X1000 Y1000 Z1000 U1000 S0 ; set axis maxima
        ; Endstops
        ; X1 = X end stop low end
        ; Y2 = Y end stop high end
        ; U1 = U end stop low end (U is second X)
        ; S1 = all active high
        ; no Z end stop
        M574 X1 S1 P"xstop+e0stop" ; combined X axis endstops
        M574 Y2 S1 P"ystop"
        ; Z-Probe
        M950 S0 C"duex.e6heat" ; create servo pin 0 for BLTouch
        M558 P9 C"^zprobe.in" H5 F120 T9000 R0.7 ; set Z probe type to bltouch and the dive height + speeds
        ; heater 7 output used for PWM of BL touch (e6 heat)
        G31 P500 X-14 Y21 Z1.000 ; Set Z probe trigger value, offset and trigger height(Z-offset)
        M557 X-14:974 Y21:1009 S52 ; Define mesh grid. 400 Points
        ;M376 H10 ; Height (mm) over which to taper off the bed compensation
        M376 H0 ; compensation taper disabled TEST
        ; Heaters
        M140 H-1 ; disable heated bed (overrides default heater mapping)
        ; tool 0 heater
        M308 S0 P"spi.cs1" Y"rtd-max31865" R395 F60
        M950 H1 C"e0heat" T0 ; heater 0 uses the e0_heat pin and sensor 1
        M307 H1 B0 S1.00 ; disable bang-bang mode for heater and set PWM limit
        M143 H1 S285 ; set temperature limit for heater 0 to 285C
        ; tool 1 heater
        M308 S1 P"e1temp" Y"thermistor" T100000 B4725 C7.06e-8 ; configure sensor 1 as thermistor on pin e1temp
        M950 H2 C"e1heat" T1 ; create nozzle heater output on e1heat and map it to sensor 1
        M307 H2 B0 S1.00 ; disable bang-bang mode for heater and set PWM limit
        M143 H2 S285 ; set temperature limit for heater 1 to 285C
        ; Fans
        M950 F0 C"fan0" Q500 ; T0 ; create fan 0 on pin fan0 and set its frequency
        M106 P0 S0 H-1 ; set fan 0 value. Thermostatic control is turned off
        M950 F1 C"fan1" Q500 ; T1 ; create fan 1 on pin fan1 and set its frequency
        M106 P1 S0 H-1 ; set fan 1 value. Thermostatic control is turned off
        M950 F2 C"fan2" Q500 ; create fan 2 on pin fan2 and set its frequency
        M106 P2 S0 H-1 ; set fan 2 value. Thermostatic control is turned off
        M950 F3 C"duex.fan3" Q500 ; create fan 3 on pin duex.fan3 and set its frequency
        M106 P3 I-1 ; set fan 3 value. Thermostatic control is turned off
        M950 F4 C"duex.fan4" Q500 ; create fan 4 on pin duex.fan4 and set its frequency
        M106 P4 I-1 ; set fan 4 value. Thermostatic control is turned off
        M950 F5 C"duex.fan5" Q500 ; create fan 5 on pin duex.fan5 and set its frequency
        M106 P5 S1 H0 T46 ; extruder 0 ; set fan 5 value. Thermostatic control is turned on
        M950 F6 C"duex.fan6" Q500 ; create fan 6 on pin duex.fan6 and set its frequency
        M106 P6 S1 H1 T46 ; extruder 1 ; set fan 6 value. Thermostatic control is turned on
        ; apparently these disabled defines still seize the IO; don't define so we can use for LED later
        ;M950 F7 C"duex.fan7" Q500 ; create fan 7 on pin duex.fan7 and set its frequency
        ;M106 P7 I-1 ; set fan 7 value. Thermostatic control is turned off
        M950 F8 C"duex.fan8" Q500 ; create fan 8 on pin duex.fan8 and set its frequency
        M106 P8 I-1 ; set fan 8 value. Thermostatic control is turned off
        ; Tools
        M563 P0 S"E0 Primary" D0 H1 F0 ; define tool 0, E0 drive, heater 1, fan 0
        G10 P0 X0 Y0 Z0 ; set tool 0 axis offsets
        G10 P0 R0 S0 ; set initial tool 0 active and standby temperatures to 0C
        M563 P1 S"E1 SEcondary" D1 H2 F1 ; define tool 1
        G10 P1 X-0.2 Y52.5 Z0 ; set tool 1 axis offsets
        G10 P1 R0 S0 ; set initial tool 1 active and standby temperatures to 0C
        ; Miscellaneous
        M575 P1 S1 B57600 ; enable support for PanelDue
        M501 ; load saved parameters from non-volatile memory
        ; Automatic power saving____________________________________________
        M911 S22.5 R29.0 P"M913 X0 Y0 G91 M83 G1 Z3 E-5 F1000" ; Set voltage thresholds and actions to run on power loss. Power Failure Pause
        ;M591 D0:1 P1 C4 S1 ; Regular filament sensor for E0 and E1
        ; disabled, fixme
        ; _______________GPIOs____________________
        ; LED strip on GPIO 'P1', duex fan7 output
        M950 P1 C"duex.fan7" Q500
        undefined 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jul 2021, 03:36 Reply Quote 0
        • undefined
          Phaedrux Moderator @BStump
          last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 03:36

          @bstump Try adding these bits to your M558

          A10 S0.005

          That force it to probe each point at least twice and will tighten the tolerance between consecutive probings and if they aren't within 0.005mm of each other it will probe again until two probe results are up to 10 times.

          You can also reduce your dice height from 5mm to 3mm and save some probing time.

          Also try changing G31 P500 to G31 P25

          Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

          undefined 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jul 2021, 03:37 Reply Quote 0
          • undefined
            BStump @Phaedrux
            last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 03:37

            @phaedrux said in Verifying mesh levelling:

            @bstump Try adding these bits to your M558

            A10 S0.005

            That force it to probe each point at least twice and will tighten the tolerance between consecutive probings and if they aren't within 0.005mm of each other it will probe again until two probe results are up to 10 times.

            You can also reduce your dice height from 5mm to 3mm and save some probing time.

            Also try changing G31 P500 to G31 P25

            Dice height?

            undefined 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jul 2021, 03:38 Reply Quote 0
            • undefined
              fcwilt @BStump
              last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 03:38

              @bstump said in Verifying mesh levelling:

              Dice height?

              Yes - how high off the table the dice are when you release them - it improves your chances of winning.

              😉

              Dice -> Dive

              Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

              undefined 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jul 2021, 03:40 Reply Quote 0
              • undefined
                BStump @fcwilt
                last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 03:40

                @fcwilt said in Verifying mesh levelling:

                @bstump said in Verifying mesh levelling:

                Dice height?

                Yes - how high off the table the dice are when you release them - it improves your chances of winning.

                😉

                Dice -> Dive

                I kind of figured that but need to figure out where it is set. ATM I am digging in how to modify the locig in that python sript to set the x and y spaying and keep the number of points below 441

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • undefined
                  Phaedrux Moderator
                  last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 03:40

                  Sorry, dive height. M558 H

                  Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                  undefined 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jul 2021, 03:42 Reply Quote 0
                  • undefined
                    BStump @Phaedrux
                    last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 03:42

                    @phaedrux
                    Yes, anything to improve the time is probing would be good. take near 45 mins now to do 400 points

                    undefined undefined 2 Replies Last reply 17 Jul 2021, 03:48 Reply Quote 0
                    • undefined
                      Phaedrux Moderator @BStump
                      last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 03:48

                      @bstump Your max Z speed is set to 200. You could probably probe at that speed reliably especially if you're double probing each point. You already have a dwell time between probe moves to allow it to settle.

                      The dive height just needs to be high enough for the pin to reliably drop and the z axis reach steady motion before it triggers.

                      Your trigger height is 1.0mm which seems too perfect. Have you actually measured it?

                      https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Test_and_calibrate_the_Z_probe#Section_Calibrate_the_Z_probe_trigger_height

                      Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                      undefined 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jul 2021, 03:49 Reply Quote 1
                      • undefined
                        BStump @Phaedrux
                        last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 03:49

                        @phaedrux said in Verifying mesh levelling:

                        @bstump Your max Z speed is set to 200. You could probably probe at that speed reliably especially if you're double probing each point. You already have a dwell time between probe moves to allow it to settle.

                        The dive height just needs to be high enough for the pin to reliably drop and the z axis reach steady motion before it triggers.

                        Your trigger height is 1.0mm which seems too perfect. Have you actually measured it?

                        https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Test_and_calibrate_the_Z_probe#Section_Calibrate_the_Z_probe_trigger_height

                        I do not know if the guys have verified the trigger height or not.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • undefined
                          fcwilt @BStump
                          last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 03:50

                          @bstump said in Verifying mesh levelling:

                          @phaedrux
                          Yes, anything to improve the time is probing would be good. take near 45 mins now to do 400 points

                          There is little to do to drastically improve the time.

                          The biggest "timesaver" would find a way to create and install a bed so flat that mesh compensation isn't needed.

                          If you solve that problem let me know - I could use a totally flat bed.

                          Frederick

                          Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                          undefined undefined 2 Replies Last reply 17 Jul 2021, 03:51 Reply Quote 0
                          • undefined
                            Phaedrux Moderator @fcwilt
                            last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 03:51

                            @fcwilt said in Verifying mesh levelling:

                            I could use a totally flat bed.

                            I'm still waiting for someone to try the self leveling concrete bed. At 1 sq meter it might be practical... just saying.

                            Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                            undefined 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jul 2021, 04:16 Reply Quote 1
                            • undefined
                              BStump @Phaedrux
                              last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 04:16

                              @phaedrux said in Verifying mesh levelling:

                              @fcwilt said in Verifying mesh levelling:

                              I could use a totally flat bed.

                              I'm still waiting for someone to try the self leveling concrete bed. At 1 sq meter it might be practical... just saying.

                              That would be a bitch to heat up and nasty with regards to spalling.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • undefined
                                dc42 administrators @fcwilt
                                last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 11:59

                                @fcwilt said in Verifying mesh levelling:

                                @bstump said in Verifying mesh levelling:

                                @phaedrux
                                Yes, anything to improve the time is probing would be good. take near 45 mins now to do 400 points

                                There is little to do to drastically improve the time.

                                The biggest "timesaver" would find a way to create and install a bed so flat that mesh compensation isn't needed.

                                If you solve that problem let me know - I could use a totally flat bed.

                                Frederick

                                You would also need a gantry with negligible sag, which is also not easy when spanning 1m.

                                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                undefined 1 Reply Last reply 17 Jul 2021, 14:07 Reply Quote 1
                                • undefined
                                  fcwilt @dc42
                                  last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 14:07

                                  @dc42 said in Verifying mesh levelling:

                                  You would also need a gantry with negligible sag, which is also not easy when spanning 1m.

                                  Indeed - I would never tackle trying to build such a large printer - I have trouble getting a satisfactorily flat bed on a 300x300 printer.

                                  Wish I had a nice large mill but mine is too small to handle 300x300.

                                  Sigh.

                                  Frederick

                                  Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                                  undefined 1 Reply Last reply 22 Jul 2021, 18:01 Reply Quote 0
                                  • undefined
                                    Phaedrux Moderator
                                    last edited by 17 Jul 2021, 17:22

                                    According to the config file it's a Modix Big Meter.

                                    https://www.modix3d.com/tech-spec/

                                    Should be fairly sturdy.

                                    Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • undefined
                                      BStump @fcwilt
                                      last edited by 22 Jul 2021, 18:01

                                      @fcwilt said in Verifying mesh levelling:

                                      @dc42 said in Verifying mesh levelling:

                                      You would also need a gantry with negligible sag, which is also not easy when spanning 1m.

                                      Indeed - I would never tackle trying to build such a large printer - I have trouble getting a satisfactorily flat bed on a 300x300 printer.

                                      Wish I had a nice large mill but mine is too small to handle 300x300.

                                      Sigh.

                                      Frederick

                                      The bed of the Modix is made from this

                                      https://www.howardprecision.com/aluminum/aluminum-cast-tool-jig-plate-stock-list/mic-6-aluminum/

                                      Sadly Modix only provides grub leveling screws on the underside middle supports and not the perimeter ones. We may have to add them to the perimeter.

                                      Grub Screw Leveling.png

                                      undefined undefined 2 Replies Last reply 22 Jul 2021, 18:31 Reply Quote 0
                                      • undefined
                                        fcwilt @BStump
                                        last edited by 22 Jul 2021, 18:31

                                        @bstump

                                        Adjusting that many grub screws is not going to be any fun at all.

                                        I have just four and even that is tedious.

                                        Frederick

                                        Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • undefined
                                          Phaedrux Moderator @BStump
                                          last edited by Phaedrux 22 Jul 2021, 20:00

                                          @bstump said in Verifying mesh levelling:

                                          Sadly Modix only provides grub leveling screws on the underside middle supports and not the perimeter ones. We may have to add them to the perimeter.

                                          Given the weight of the bed the grub screws on the center area may be just to counteract sag, so the perimeter may be less critical.

                                          Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          61 out of 71
                                          • First post
                                            61/71
                                            Last post
                                          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA