Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Random additional steps - interference?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
    Tuning and tweaking
    9
    33
    2.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • bubblevisorundefined
      bubblevisor
      last edited by

      0.2mm layer height ESUN ABS with enclosure at 60degrees C.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • bubblevisorundefined
        bubblevisor
        last edited by bubblevisor

        Only difference is the board. Good printer is Duet 2 wifi bad is duet 3 mini 5+ and other bad printer is big dipper. Both bad printers' prints look exactly the same.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • bubblevisorundefined
          bubblevisor @Phaedrux
          last edited by bubblevisor

          @phaedrux The stealth chop point seems potentially likely as the good printer is running RRF3.3 on Duet 2 spreadcycle and bad printer is 3.4 on big dipper TMC2209 defaulting to stealthchop with a weird speed threshold that switches to spreadcycle. This sounds like it can give rise to inconsistencies.

          I'll change the M569 to enforce spreadcycle and report back. Fingers crossed.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • jens55undefined
            jens55 @Phaedrux
            last edited by

            @phaedrux, I don't think direction of travel has any bearing here but I will check that motor pulleys are tight once the current print is finished (tonight). I am pretty sure I loctited them last time I had an issue .... which btw also was intermittent in a way as the pulley could move a bit but not easily so sometimes it moved and other times it didn't.
            Great suggestion !!!
            As far as 'normal' backlash, I would have expected the artifacts to be very repeatable as every layer in this model is identical to the previous layer ..... but as I said, a pulley has caused something like that before.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jens55undefined
              jens55
              last edited by

              I had a chance to check the motor pulley on x and y and they are tight. The same model as printed before but with considerable speed reduction (300 mm/s to 200 mm/s) produces a much better surface finish and only two small position shifts in only one axis. I left the acceleration at 15000 but am now printing again with a reduced acceleration of 10000. I still have infill and inner wall speed set at 300 mm/sec.

              The only other issue I have are the zits that appear randomly. There are two kinds of zits - some are sitting on the outside of the wall and these can be scraped off with only a finger nail. There are however little bumps that are completely enclosed and I am thinking these might be caused by issues with the faster infill speed. These last bumps are not really a problem but more of an annoyance.
              Anyway, I was just printing too fast. This is with a Jubilee printer and quite honestly it's a bit disappointing that I can't go faster.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • bubblevisorundefined
                bubblevisor
                last edited by bubblevisor

                BINGO! I turned off the default stealthchop and enabled spreadcycle via M569. Completeley solved the problem.

                Default Stealthchop switches back and forth between spreadcycle and stealthchop when the speed is low. This seems to create a print blemish when this happens. My advice is STICK TO SPREADCYCLE!Main Lathe Clamp-01.jpg

                droftartsundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • bubblevisorundefined
                  bubblevisor @dc42
                  last edited by

                  @dc42 THanks for your help. You were spot on!

                  dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • dc42undefined dc42 marked this topic as a question
                  • dc42undefined dc42 has marked this topic as solved
                  • dc42undefined
                    dc42 administrators @bubblevisor
                    last edited by

                    Glad to help.

                    Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                    Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                    http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • droftartsundefined
                      droftarts administrators @bubblevisor
                      last edited by

                      @bubblevisor if you set the changeover speed to below the jerk value, then at least you get quiet motors at standstill.

                      Ian

                      Bed-slinger - Mini5+ WiFi/1LC | RRP Fisher v1 - D2 WiFi | Polargraph - D2 WiFi | TronXY X5S - 6HC/Roto | CNC router - 6HC | Tractus3D T1250 - D2 Eth

                      bubblevisorundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • bubblevisorundefined
                        bubblevisor @droftarts
                        last edited by bubblevisor

                        @droftarts Yep, I see your point. Personally I am not concerned about the noise benefit over the already quiet spreadcycle. Additionally, I am astonished how the stealthchop mode so profoundly ruined the overall print quality. Given I was running the "standard, out of the box application" of it (unbeknownst to me) I would prefer that the default was not to have stealthchop enabled. Think of all the people out there who suffer stealthchop-induced bad print quality and are unaware of it.

                        Phaedruxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Phaedruxundefined
                          Phaedrux Moderator @bubblevisor
                          last edited by

                          @bubblevisor said in Random additional steps - interference?:

                          I would prefer that the default was not to have stealthchop enabled.

                          In 3.4 onward spreadcycle is the default.

                          Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                          bubblevisorundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • bubblevisorundefined
                            bubblevisor @Phaedrux
                            last edited by bubblevisor

                            @phaedrux Really? This is my firmware from the printer in question. "RepRapFirmware version 3.4.0beta5+1"

                            Phaedruxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Phaedruxundefined
                              Phaedrux Moderator @bubblevisor
                              last edited by

                              @bubblevisor said in Random additional steps - interference?:

                              3.4.0beta5+1"

                              Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                              bubblevisorundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • bubblevisorundefined
                                bubblevisor @Phaedrux
                                last edited by

                                @phaedrux Do you mean releases after 3.4.0?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Phaedruxundefined
                                  Phaedrux Moderator
                                  last edited by

                                  3.4 final.

                                  Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA