Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Laser Filament Monitor - test results

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Filament Monitor
    16
    139
    21.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • fmaundefined
      fma
      last edited by

      Ok, thanks. I'll try to make a small pitch...

      Frédéric

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Snypesundefined
        Snypes
        last edited by

        This post is deleted!
        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Snypesundefined
          Snypes
          last edited by

          Has anyone considered uncoupling the filament from the laser and having the laser read a constant metallic surface for example (much like an idler bearing maybe?)?

          That's pretty much the solution used by jtx on his skelestruder and it would at least allow all filaments to be calibrated against a constant....

          https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3091625

          T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • kraegarundefined
            kraegar
            last edited by

            I may have a new "least accurate filament" - Atomic Marble PLA

            Duet3D laser filament monitor on endstop input 3, disabled, allowed movement 40% to 120%, check every 3.0mm, current position -1.1, brightness 96, shutter 17, measured minimum 12%, average 71%, maximum 167% over 92403.1mm

            Co-Creator of the RailcoreII CoreXY printer
            https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2407174

            T3P3Tonyundefined Alexander Mundyundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • brunofportoundefined
              brunofporto
              last edited by

              I do also compare the slicer predicted filament usage with the measures filament usage and have a very unusual inverse relation where the ones with the worst reading % also have the most accurate measurement of total filament usage!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T3P3Tonyundefined
                T3P3Tony administrators @kraegar
                last edited by

                @kraegar wow. so opaque to visible light but possibly not to IR...? strangely bad!

                www.duet3d.com

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T3P3Tonyundefined
                  T3P3Tony administrators @Snypes
                  last edited by

                  @snypes well the magnetic monitor does that and if we add that complexity then it's easier to use the hall sensor than the laser

                  www.duet3d.com

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • brunofportoundefined
                    brunofporto
                    last edited by

                    How can I register the readings of the entire print instead of max, min and avg?

                    I would like to see the full information, alongside retract and extrusion commands.

                    then I will be able to really visualize skipping/clogging effects and separate them from the "normal flow" average and deviation to better tune the thresholds.

                    T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • T3P3Tonyundefined
                      T3P3Tony administrators @brunofporto
                      last edited by

                      @brunofporto thats not a function in the firmware right now. the documentation:

                      https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Duet3dFilamentMonitor_LaserVersion

                      explains the protocol used however it would need to be a firmware feature request to have some way of logging/outputting this information. When the filament is detected as moving there is a movement data packet sent ever 40ms, fair bit of information to handle.

                      www.duet3d.com

                      brunofportoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • brunofportoundefined
                        brunofporto @T3P3Tony
                        last edited by brunofporto

                        @t3p3tony

                        Would hurt the duet's processor asks a lot of M591 and log with M929? I mean, it is possible to use these commands to register the readings over time?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Alexander Mundyundefined
                          Alexander Mundy @kraegar
                          last edited by

                          @kraegar Sorry to be off topic, but curious if you have you set non linear extrusion or pressure advance for the Atomic Marble? The PETG version is way different than other PETG's extrusion wise.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • kraegarundefined
                            kraegar
                            last edited by

                            That was the PLA marble, and I left the pressure advance at the same setting as my other filaments. No other changes.

                            Co-Creator of the RailcoreII CoreXY printer
                            https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2407174

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • T3P3Tonyundefined
                              T3P3Tony administrators @wilriker
                              last edited by

                              @wilriker I have finally updated the design here:
                              https://www.youmagine.com/designs/duet3d-laser-filament-monitor-housing-v2

                              www.duet3d.com

                              wilrikerundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • wilrikerundefined
                                wilriker @T3P3Tony
                                last edited by

                                @t3p3tony I had merged your changes manually into the original SCAD file by David. It did not improve the results in my tests. They were actually a little bit worse.

                                But currently my printing is completely on hold and will be for another couple of weeks. After that I will compare your updated version with the one I had created.

                                Manuel
                                Duet 3 6HC (v0.6) with RPi 4B on a custom Cartesian
                                with probably always latest firmware/DWC (incl. betas or self-compiled)
                                My Tool Collection

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA