Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    RepRapFirmware 3.0

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    35
    176
    30.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • mudcruzrundefined
      mudcruzr
      last edited by mudcruzr

      I've modified my Maestro 12864 menu files to work with RRF3b1, but to avoid confusion I've created a separate new repository on Github for them. There are no changes to functionality yet, they do the same as before but work with RRF3.

      Here they are: https://github.com/mudcruzr/Duet-Maestro-12864-Menu-Files-for-RRF3b1/releases/tag/v0.1.RRF3b1

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • A Former User?
        A Former User
        last edited by

        Should you not be able to use M401 instead of M280 to keep the menu files the same? I thought M401 called M98 P"deployprobe.g" which then can ve version specific?

        mudcruzrundefined dc42undefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • PaulHewundefined
          PaulHew @mudcruzr
          last edited by

          @mudcruzr Thank you, greatly appreciated.
          Yes I saw the Y and Z's in the code and did wonder!

          Time to back everything up and try it!
          Thanks again.
          Paul

          RailCore II - Duet Mini + 1LC, Voron V0.1 - Duet Mini
          Voron 2.4 disassembled..... Waiting for the RailCore Mini....

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • mudcruzrundefined
            mudcruzr @A Former User
            last edited by

            @bearer said in RepRapFirmware 3.0:

            Should you not be able to use M401 instead of M280 to keep the menu files the same? I thought M401 called M98 P"deployprobe.g" which then can ve version specific?

            I guess I could, but I expect RRF2 and RRF3 to diverge more and more as RRF3 develops and trying to include new RRF3 functionality while maintaining backwards compatibility with RRF2 seems a bit like making a rod for my own back. I fully expect the whole lot to be rewritten & redesigned more than once.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • dc42undefined
              dc42 administrators @mudcruzr
              last edited by

              @mudcruzr said in RepRapFirmware 3.0:

              No errors from config.g but I now have the probe working. I hadn't put the C"zprobe.in" in the M558 line because the probe was working without it (as long as the M950 was still in deployprobe.g). As soon as I added the C"zprobe.in" everything started working as it should. The M558 line is now:

              M558 P9 C"zprobe.in" H5 F300 T4000 A10 S0.003 R0.5 B1

              And M950 S0 C"zprobe.mod" is the last line in my config.g and nowhere else.

              Thanks guys.

              I can see why. The default pin configuration for M558 is "zprobe.in+zprobe.mod". For your M950 command to work, the zprobe.mod pin must be free. So you need to redefine the Z probe pins as just "zprobe.in" in M558, to free up the "zprobe.mod" pin.

              Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
              Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
              http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • dc42undefined
                dc42 administrators @A Former User
                last edited by

                @bearer said in RepRapFirmware 3.0:

                Should you not be able to use M401 instead of M280 to keep the menu files the same? I thought M401 called M98 P"deployprobe.g" which then can ve version specific?

                M401 does a little more than that, it also records the Z probe as being deployed. This means that when you come to do a G30, the firmware knows that the probe is deployed, so it doesn't do an automatic deploy/retract around the G30 command. This can be used to deploy the probe just once at the start of bed.g and retract the proibe just once at the end. [This doesn't work for BLTouch, which needs to be deployed/retracted at every probe point.]

                So M401 should always be used in preference to M98 Pdeployprobe.g, and similarly M402 instead of M98 Pretractprobe.g.

                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • gtj0undefined
                  gtj0
                  last edited by gtj0

                  @dc42 just did a git pull to get your latest v3-dev changes and just fyi... auto bed levelling is still non-automatic. Calculations are done but no movement.

                  If you don't have time to look at it right now, that's cool. I can take a look this weekend.

                  dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • dc42undefined
                    dc42 administrators @gtj0
                    last edited by

                    @gtj0 said in RepRapFirmware 3.0:

                    @dc42 just did a git pull to get your latest v3-dev changes and just fyi... auto bed levelling is still non-automatic. Calculations are done but no movement.

                    If you don't have time to look at it right now, that's cool. I can take a look this weekend.

                    Does it work properly on your printer using 2.03RC2 ?

                    Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                    Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                    http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                    gtj0undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • gtj0undefined
                      gtj0 @dc42
                      last edited by

                      @dc42 said in RepRapFirmware 3.0:

                      @gtj0 said in RepRapFirmware 3.0:

                      @dc42 just did a git pull to get your latest v3-dev changes and just fyi... auto bed levelling is still non-automatic. Calculations are done but no movement.

                      If you don't have time to look at it right now, that's cool. I can take a look this weekend.

                      Does it work properly on your printer using 2.03RC2 ?

                      I just double checked and yes it works on 2.03RC2. It does the 3 probes, calculates the offsets, then adjusts the motors to compensate.

                      dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • dc42undefined
                        dc42 administrators @gtj0
                        last edited by

                        @gtj0, thanks for confirming this. I will invesgigate the issue RRF3.

                        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • dc42undefined
                          dc42 administrators
                          last edited by

                          I think I have found the reason for leadscrew moves not working. I have pushed some updates to the RRF 3 source. Please note, I have also made some changes to the M558 command.

                          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                          gtj0undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • gtj0undefined
                            gtj0 @dc42
                            last edited by

                            @dc42 said in RepRapFirmware 3.0:

                            I think I have found the reason for leadscrew moves not working. I have pushed some updates to the RRF 3 source. Please note, I have also made some changes to the M558 command.

                            Working now, thanks!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • mudcruzrundefined
                              mudcruzr
                              last edited by

                              Is there any chance of a new build with these changes in (for those of us without the wherewithall to compile) please?

                              dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • dc42undefined
                                dc42 administrators @mudcruzr
                                last edited by

                                @mudcruzr said in RepRapFirmware 3.0:

                                Is there any chance of a new build with these changes in (for those of us without the wherewithall to compile) please?

                                New binaries here https://www.dropbox.com/s/fyvibzm0zl92hiy/Duet2CombinedFirmware.bin?dl=0 and here https://www.dropbox.com/s/m0r3ldy424mxf4v/DuetMaestroFirmware.bin?dl=0.

                                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • mudcruzrundefined
                                  mudcruzr
                                  last edited by

                                  @dc42 Many thanks David

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • oliofundefined
                                    oliof
                                    last edited by

                                    That last build does not move the extruder for me on a CR-20. I checked by moving the extruder motor to X and was able to move it. Downgrading to 2.03RC2 (what I ran previously) fixed the extruder.

                                    I am pretty sure that nothing in my config.g needs changing, but maybe I overlooked something in the wiki. See attached file.

                                    • 0_1558265361187_config.g

                                    <>RatRig V-Minion Fly Super5Pro RRF<> V-Core 3.1 IDEX k*****r <> RatRig V-Minion SKR 2 Marlin<>

                                    Dougal1957undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Dougal1957undefined
                                      Dougal1957 @oliof
                                      last edited by

                                      @oliof you did have the nozzle heated didn't you?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • oliofundefined
                                        oliof
                                        last edited by

                                        Yes, this was with a heated nozzle -- DWC showed extruder moves in the UI, but the motor was not moving and there was no error regarding attempting to extrude with a cold nozzle. And even enabling cool extrusion (with filament removed) with M302 P1 did not allow the extruder motor to move.

                                        <>RatRig V-Minion Fly Super5Pro RRF<> V-Core 3.1 IDEX k*****r <> RatRig V-Minion SKR 2 Marlin<>

                                        Dougal1957undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Dougal1957undefined
                                          Dougal1957 @oliof
                                          last edited by

                                          @oliof just checking as it is a common mistake but not valid in this case

                                          oliofundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • oliofundefined
                                            oliof @Dougal1957
                                            last edited by

                                            @dougal1957 it's absolutely fair to ask (-:

                                            <>RatRig V-Minion Fly Super5Pro RRF<> V-Core 3.1 IDEX k*****r <> RatRig V-Minion SKR 2 Marlin<>

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA