Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    RepRapFirmware 3.0

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    35
    176
    30.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • dc42undefined
      dc42 administrators
      last edited by

      I found the problem. The threshold is not being initialised. A workaround is to put command G31 P500 (or whatever threshold you want to use) after the M558 command.

      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

      smoki3undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • smoki3undefined
        smoki3 @dc42
        last edited by

        @dc42 said in RepRapFirmware 3.0:

        G31 P500

        Thanks this works fine

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jay_s_ukundefined
          jay_s_uk
          last edited by

          @dc42 I've also upgraded to RRF 3.0 to try it out.
          Previously, in RRF 2, when setting up a Z Probe, I used to have M558 H4. This H4 was added to the z probe offset so it would look for the bed, in my case, 31.66mm above z, as my probe offset is 27.66.
          Now I'm having to use H30 as RRF 3 seems to be ignoring the z probe offset. Is this correct?

          Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

          dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dc42undefined
            dc42 administrators @jay_s_uk
            last edited by

            @jay_s_uk said in RepRapFirmware 3.0:

            @dc42 I've also upgraded to RRF 3.0 to try it out.
            Previously, in RRF 2, when setting up a Z Probe, I used to have M558 H4. This H4 was added to the z probe offset so it would look for the bed, in my case, 31.66mm above z, as my probe offset is 27.66.
            Now I'm having to use H30 as RRF 3 seems to be ignoring the z probe offset. Is this correct?

            No, that's not correct. RRF 3 should not ignore the Z probe offset, and I am fairly sure it doesn't on my printers.

            The default M558 H value is 5. It's normally only necessary to increase it when aut-calibrating a delta printer for the first time, when the homed height and delta radius enters in the M665 command are likely to be inaccurate.

            How come your Z probe trigger height (which is what I presume you mean by "offset") is as high as 31mm?

            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

            jay_s_ukundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jay_s_ukundefined
              jay_s_uk @dc42
              last edited by

              @dc42
              I have a linear plus with an E3D hot end. So I use the probe that came with is as well as little block to allow me to miss the heat block on the hot end. This has increased the z probe offset somewhat from 16.8ish that comes as standard to 27.6ish.
              Its works fine with RRF 2 without issue.
              But switching over to RRF 3, the z probe was coming into contact with the bed way before it was actually triggering.
              I increased the H from 4 to 30 and this allowed me to run G32 and the M500. But I've had to leave H as 30 otherwise the z probe comes into contact with the bed. And the gap it maintains between the probe and the bed is only around 3mm, hence why I think it is ignoring the z probe offset.

              Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • dc42undefined
                dc42 administrators
                last edited by

                You are right, it's not adding the trigger height to the dive height. I will fix this in the next build. Thanks for reporting it.

                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jay_s_ukundefined
                  jay_s_uk
                  last edited by

                  At least I'm not going mad. Thanks

                  Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                  dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • dc42undefined
                    dc42 administrators @jay_s_uk
                    last edited by

                    @jay_s_uk, please try the new binary at https://www.dropbox.com/s/zfv4p7dr2ycmjzd/Duet2CombinedFirmware.bin?dl=0.

                    Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                    Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                    http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jay_s_ukundefined
                      jay_s_uk
                      last edited by

                      @dc42 thats spot on

                      Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • dc42undefined
                        dc42 administrators
                        last edited by

                        @jay_s_uk said in RepRapFirmware 3.0:

                        @dc42 thats spot on

                        Thanks for confirming!

                        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • wilrikerundefined
                          wilriker
                          last edited by wilriker

                          I also now tried out RRF3 and first very obvious observation: Fan PWM inversion does not work. I do have

                          ; Fans
                          M950 F0 P"fan0" Q10                               ; Fan 0 has a low PWM frequency of only 10Hz
                          M950 F1 P"!fan1" Q25000                           ; Fan 1 has a high PWM frequency of 25kHz and is inverted
                          M950 F2 P"!fan2" Q25000                           ; Fan 2 has a high PWM frequency of 25kHz and is inverted
                          [...]
                          M106 P0 S0 H-1 C"Part Cooling Fan"                 ; Set fan 0 value. Thermostatic control is turned off
                          M106 P1 S1 L0.7 H1 T45:220 C"Hotend Fan"           ; Set fan 1 value. Thermostatic control is turned on
                          M106 P2 S0 H-1 C"Hardware Fan"                     ; Set fan 2 value. Thermostatic control is turned off
                          

                          where the first fan is a regular 3-wire fan but the other two are 4-wire PWM controlled fans and both spin at 100% speed after startup (I know fan 1 is thermostatic but the hotend is at room temp). Unless I make fan 1 non-thermostatic I have no way of stopping it (I stopped fan 2 by issuing M106 P2 S1).

                          EDIT: Second observation:
                          I have two independent Z steppers. Also each stepper has a separate endstop switch. Homing Z works fine with both steppers running until their appropriate switch is triggered. After that I un-hide W axis (right of the two Z steppers) and apply a correction since the switches are not perfectly aligned. So far this works. What does not work is M119 for W axis. It will always show that the endstop is not triggered even though at the same time it shows triggered for Z.

                          
                          M584 X0 Y1 Z2:3 W3 E4                              ; Assign one driver X, Y and E and two to Z
                          [...]
                          M574 Z1 S1 P"zstop+e0stop"                         ; Set active high endstop at low end on Z with two separate endstops
                          M574 W1 S1 P"e0stop"                               ; Set active high endstop at low end on W
                          

                          Since I never use W axis outside of homez.g and don't even have a homew.g for me this is purely cosmetical - but their are probably other users that depend on this working correctly.

                          Manuel
                          Duet 3 6HC (v0.6) with RPi 4B on a custom Cartesian
                          with probably always latest firmware/DWC (incl. betas or self-compiled)
                          My Tool Collection

                          dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • dc42undefined
                            dc42 administrators @wilriker
                            last edited by dc42

                            @wilriker said in RepRapFirmware 3.0:

                            I also now tried out RRF3 and first very obvious observation: Fan PWM inversion does not work. I do have
                            ; Fans
                            M950 F0 P"fan0" Q10 ; Fan 0 has a low PWM frequency of only 10Hz
                            M950 F1 P"!fan1" Q25000 ; Fan 1 has a high PWM frequency of 25kHz and is inverted
                            M950 F2 P"!fan2" Q25000 ; Fan 2 has a high PWM frequency of 25kHz and is inverted
                            [...]
                            M106 P0 S0 H-1 C"Part Cooling Fan" ; Set fan 0 value. Thermostatic control is turned off
                            M106 P1 S1 L0.7 H1 T45:220 C"Hotend Fan" ; Set fan 1 value. Thermostatic control is turned on
                            M106 P2 S0 H-1 C"Hardware Fan" ; Set fan 2 value. Thermostatic control is turned off

                            The pin name parameter in the M950 command (and most other commands that don't take axis parameters) is C not P.

                            What does not work is M119 for W axis. It will always show that the endstop is not triggered even though at the same time it shows triggered for Z.

                            You can't currently assign the same endstop input to more than one axis. So the M574 command to assign e0stop to W is failing. If you run that command from the console you will get an error message.

                            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                            wilrikerundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • wilrikerundefined
                              wilriker @dc42
                              last edited by

                              @dc42 said in RepRapFirmware 3.0:

                              The pin name parameter in the M950 command (and most other commands that don't take axis parameters) is C not P.

                              In that case the example code for M106 in the RRF3 wiki is wrong (I checked M950 has it right).

                              You can't currently assign the same endstop input to more than one axis. So the M574 command to assign e0stop to W is failing. If you run that command from the console you will get an error message.

                              As I said no real problem for me but thanks for clarifying.

                              Manuel
                              Duet 3 6HC (v0.6) with RPi 4B on a custom Cartesian
                              with probably always latest firmware/DWC (incl. betas or self-compiled)
                              My Tool Collection

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • dc42undefined
                                dc42 administrators
                                last edited by

                                I have corrected the example.

                                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                wilrikerundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • wilrikerundefined
                                  wilriker @dc42
                                  last edited by

                                  @dc42 Thanks. Just wanted to do it myself only to find it's been done already. 🙂

                                  Manuel
                                  Duet 3 6HC (v0.6) with RPi 4B on a custom Cartesian
                                  with probably always latest firmware/DWC (incl. betas or self-compiled)
                                  My Tool Collection

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • wilrikerundefined
                                    wilriker
                                    last edited by

                                    Found another discrepancy in the wiki. In the description for M950 C it says to enable pull-up resistor ^ has to be trailing. In Pin Name Format section below it says the ^ should appear in front of the pin name.

                                    Again not relevant for me but others might stumble across that one.

                                    Manuel
                                    Duet 3 6HC (v0.6) with RPi 4B on a custom Cartesian
                                    with probably always latest firmware/DWC (incl. betas or self-compiled)
                                    My Tool Collection

                                    dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • dc42undefined
                                      dc42 administrators @wilriker
                                      last edited by

                                      @wilriker said in RepRapFirmware 3.0:

                                      Found another discrepancy in the wiki. In the description for M950 C it says to enable pull-up resistor ^ has to be trailing. In Pin Name Format section below it says the ^ should appear in front of the pin name.

                                      Again not relevant for me but others might stumble across that one.

                                      Thanks, I've corrected that.

                                      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • t9undefined
                                        t9
                                        last edited by

                                        I am testing the newly added function M581.
                                        How would you ignore output, in Reprap 2.03 this was done with S-1, but there is no S parameter available.
                                        Thanks

                                        dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • dc42undefined
                                          dc42 administrators @t9
                                          last edited by dc42

                                          @t9 said in RepRapFirmware 3.0:

                                          I am testing the newly added function M581.
                                          How would you ignore output, in Reprap 2.03 this was done with S-1, but there is no S parameter available.
                                          Thanks

                                          Use M280 M581 Tn P"nil" to select no input ports.

                                          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                          t9undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • t9undefined
                                            t9 @dc42
                                            last edited by

                                            @dc42

                                            Thanks, I found that M581 Tn P"nil" works. Im not sure if that's what you meant, rather than M280

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA