Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    stepper precision

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    3D Printing General Chat
    6
    110
    6.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • alankilianundefined
      alankilian
      last edited by

      Well, all I can say is you are getting results that do not match with my experience in such situations.

      Being able to rotate 180-degrees and repeatable read within 0.005-degree is some kind of black magic indeed. You are a master.

      SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

      arhiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • arhiundefined
        arhi @alankilian
        last edited by

        @alankilian said in stepper precision:

        Well, all I can say is you are getting results that do not match with my experience in such situations.

        Being able to rotate 180-degrees and repeatable read within 0.005-degree is some kind of black magic indeed. You are a master.

        😄 we'll see how it goes on the "bigger sample" I just let it go 400 steps forwards and 400 steps backwards and store all the data and spit out differences... would be much easier if I knew python (darn thing don't even have proper arrays) ... as for 180degrees back forth that one I did not test ... I just let it run 3200 steps forward and 3200 steps backwards and compared two greps ... let's see how the aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa sh%$#%^# forgot to pipe it into file 😞 .. need to run it again ... brb

        mendenmhundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • mendenmhundefined
          mendenmh @arhi
          last edited by mendenmh

          @arhi As to your comment about array in python: the numpy package is the default scientific array package. It is a lot like matlab. It is extraordinarily powerful. The python 'array' class, and python's own lists and tuples, are for entirely different purposes than handling what you want.

          arhiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • arhiundefined
            arhi @mendenmh
            last edited by arhi

            @mendenmh I don't plan to learn python and it's libraries today (I hope never), dunno why it was invented and how the hack it gained popularity but... I'll make it work somehow to get this done.... anyone want to send some code for me to run I'll be happy to 😄 .. my example that's attached is enough for anyone to know how to read the data from encoder and move the motor, so I'll run the code provided and report back results 😄 if anyone is interested ...

            attm waiting for this to finish:

            #!/usr/bin/env python3
            
            import pyprofibus
            import time
            import RPi.GPIO as GPIO
            
            def main(watchdog=None):
                    master = None
                    forwarddata = []
                    backwardsdata = []
            
                    #poserem se na jezik
                    for i in range(410):
                            forwarddata.append(0);
                            backwardsdata.append(0);
            
            
                    try:
                            config = pyprofibus.PbConf.fromFile("arhi_readencoder.conf")
                            master = config.makeDPM()
                            outData = {}
                            for slaveConf in config.slaveConfs:
                                    slaveDesc = slaveConf.makeDpSlaveDesc()
                                    master.addSlave(slaveDesc)
                                    outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr] = bytearray((0x00, ))
            
                            master.initialize()
            
                            GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BCM)
                            GPIO.setup(12, GPIO.OUT)
                            GPIO.setup(13, GPIO.OUT)
                            GPIO.output(12, GPIO.LOW)
                            GPIO.output(13, GPIO.LOW)
                            totalsteps = 0
                            for i in range(400):
                                    done = False
                                    counter = 0
                                    average = 0
                                    while not done:
                                            outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr] = bytearray((0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00, ))
                                            for slaveDesc in master.getSlaveList():
                                                    slaveDesc.setOutData(outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr])
            
                                            handledSlaveDesc = master.run()
            
                                            if handledSlaveDesc:
                                                    inData = handledSlaveDesc.getInData()
                                                    if inData is not None:
                                                            print(inData[3] + inData[2]*256)
                                                            average = average + inData[3] + inData[2]*256
                                                            counter = counter + 1
                                                            if (counter > 9):
                                                                    done = True
                                                                    average = average / 10
            
                                            if watchdog is not None:
                                                    watchdog()
            
                                    print("AVERAGE: ", totalsteps, ", ", average,  flush=True)
                                    forwarddata[totalsteps] = average;
            
                                    # now do a step
                                    GPIO.output(12, GPIO.HIGH)
                                    time.sleep(0.0001)
                                    GPIO.output(12, GPIO.LOW)
                                    time.sleep(1)
                                    totalsteps = totalsteps + 1
            
                            GPIO.output(13, GPIO.HIGH)
                            for i in range(400):
                                    done = False
                                    counter = 0
                                    average = 0
                                    while not done:
                                            outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr] = bytearray((0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00, ))
                                            for slaveDesc in master.getSlaveList():
                                                    slaveDesc.setOutData(outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr])
            
                                            handledSlaveDesc = master.run()
            
                                            if handledSlaveDesc:
                                                    inData = handledSlaveDesc.getInData()
                                                    if inData is not None:
                                                            print(inData[3] + inData[2]*256)
                                                            average = average + inData[3] + inData[2]*256
                                                            counter = counter + 1
                                                            if (counter > 9):
                                                                    done = True
                                                                    average = average / 10
            
                                            if watchdog is not None:
                                                    watchdog()
            
                                    print("AVERAGE: ", totalsteps, ", ", average,  flush=True)
                                    backwardsdata[totalsteps] = average;
            
                                    # now do a step
                                    GPIO.output(12, GPIO.HIGH)
                                    time.sleep(0.0001)
                                    GPIO.output(12, GPIO.LOW)
                                    time.sleep(1)
                                    totalsteps = totalsteps - 1
            
                            for i in range( len(backwardsdata) ):
                                    print(i, forwarddata[i], backwardsdata[i], forwarddata[i] - backwardsdata[i])
            
                    except pyprofibus.ProfibusError as e:
                            print("Terminating: %s" % str(e))
                            return 1
                    finally:
                            GPIO.cleanup()
                            if master:
                                    master.destroy()
                    return 0
            
            if __name__ == "__main__":
                    import sys
                    sys.exit(main())
            
            
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • alankilianundefined
              alankilian
              last edited by

              I'm having a little trouble analyzing your data.

              It looks like you are taking 3201 samples every revolution when I look at the .zip file you uploaded.

              I didn't take a look at the Python code since I'm also not a Python expert.

              Take a look at when your encoder flips over to it's minimum count and see that there seem to be ( to my eyes) 3201 samples between them.

              That makes it a little difficult to analyze.

              I'll take a look at your next data set after you upload it.

              SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

              arhiundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • arhiundefined
                arhi @alankilian
                last edited by

                @alankilian going forward then backward and recording all steps was awesome suggestion ... data is ugly 😞

                33eb1e94-1b20-4446-a164-5e4df9cb1816-image.png

                Untitled 1.ods

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • arhiundefined
                  arhi @alankilian
                  last edited by arhi

                  @alankilian

                  It looks like you are taking 3201 samples every revolution when I look at the .zip file you uploaded.

                  the "multiturn" file is stepping for a while (whole night) going forward. encoder goes up to 65535 and then to 0 (it is absolute encoder) so it allow multiturn but records only positions inside one revolution

                  the "single turn" have 2 reasons to figure out it's full turn, one is to read the "similar" (20 less difference) position from the first one it reads when it start, and second reason is if it makes 400*32 steps (I assume 1/32 microstepping .9 degree motor ) .. first run it made 3199 steps in second 3200 steps. Motor is 1.8 degree and microstepping is 1/16 so 3200 steps is ok.

                  Now, you see "more" data, that's cause I do: Step, read encoder 10 times (output all 10), calc average of those 10 and display average value (add them all together and divide by 10). So for every step there is 11 rows in the txt file...

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • arhiundefined
                    arhi
                    last edited by

                    error goes from 60 to 80 or 0.33° to 0.44°

                    the span is 400 microsteps or 25 full steps so I'm assuming the full step positions are where the error is .33° and between steps the error goes up to .44°. I expected to see 50 peaks and not 25 as I expected that "half step" is nearly as precise as full step (as number of ppl and documents online state)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • arhiundefined
                      arhi
                      last edited by

                      I'll use a stiff coupler now to see if that would make a difference...

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • arhiundefined
                        arhi
                        last edited by

                        raw data (the xls is few posts back)

                        backforth.txt

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • arhiundefined
                          arhi
                          last edited by arhi

                          S42B - same motor, open-loop mode, here we can see, I think the half stepping too...

                          4c8b1d4a-d471-4a5e-b507-e516ed51f8f5-image.png
                          s42b-openloop-back-forth.txt

                          alankilianundefined arhiundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • alankilianundefined
                            alankilian @arhi
                            last edited by

                            @arhi Can you post your Python code for this?

                            I suspect there's an "off-by-one" somewhere and you're getting better results than you see in your graph.

                            I'm probably wrong, but if so, you might be happy.

                            SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

                            arhiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • arhiundefined
                              arhi @arhi
                              last edited by

                              This post is deleted!
                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • arhiundefined
                                arhi @alankilian
                                last edited by arhi

                                @alankilian said in stepper precision:

                                @arhi Can you post your Python code for this?

                                I suspect there's an "off-by-one" somewhere and you're getting better results than you see in your graph.

                                I'm probably wrong, but if so, you might be happy.

                                I hoped but it's not 😞 anyhow .. here it is:

                                #!/usr/bin/env python3
                                
                                import pyprofibus
                                import time
                                import RPi.GPIO as GPIO
                                
                                def main(watchdog=None):
                                        master = None
                                        forwarddata = []
                                        backwardsdata = []
                                
                                        #poserem se na jezik
                                        for i in range(410):
                                                forwarddata.append(0);
                                                backwardsdata.append(0);
                                
                                
                                        try:
                                                config = pyprofibus.PbConf.fromFile("arhi_readencoder.conf")
                                                master = config.makeDPM()
                                                outData = {}
                                                for slaveConf in config.slaveConfs:
                                                        slaveDesc = slaveConf.makeDpSlaveDesc()
                                                        master.addSlave(slaveDesc)
                                                        outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr] = bytearray((0x00, ))
                                
                                                master.initialize()
                                
                                                GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BCM)
                                                GPIO.setup(12, GPIO.OUT)
                                                GPIO.setup(13, GPIO.OUT)
                                                GPIO.output(12, GPIO.LOW)
                                                GPIO.output(13, GPIO.LOW)
                                                totalsteps = 0
                                                for i in range(400):
                                                        done = False
                                                        counter = 0
                                                        average = 0
                                                        while not done:
                                                                outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr] = bytearray((0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00, ))
                                                                for slaveDesc in master.getSlaveList():
                                                                        slaveDesc.setOutData(outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr])
                                
                                                                handledSlaveDesc = master.run()
                                
                                                                if handledSlaveDesc:
                                                                        inData = handledSlaveDesc.getInData()
                                                                        if inData is not None:
                                                                                print(inData[3] + inData[2]*256)
                                                                                average = average + inData[3] + inData[2]*256
                                                                                counter = counter + 1
                                                                                if (counter > 9):
                                                                                        done = True
                                                                                        average = average / 10
                                
                                                                if watchdog is not None:
                                                                        watchdog()
                                
                                                        print("AVERAGE: ", totalsteps, ", ", average,  flush=True)
                                                        forwarddata[totalsteps] = average;
                                
                                                        # now do a step
                                                        GPIO.output(12, GPIO.HIGH)
                                                        time.sleep(0.0001)
                                                        GPIO.output(12, GPIO.LOW)
                                                        time.sleep(1)
                                                        totalsteps = totalsteps + 1
                                
                                                GPIO.output(13, GPIO.HIGH)
                                                for i in range(400):
                                                        done = False
                                                        counter = 0
                                                        average = 0
                                                        while not done:
                                                                outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr] = bytearray((0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00, ))
                                                                for slaveDesc in master.getSlaveList():
                                                                        slaveDesc.setOutData(outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr])
                                
                                                                handledSlaveDesc = master.run()
                                
                                                                if handledSlaveDesc:
                                                                        inData = handledSlaveDesc.getInData()
                                                                        if inData is not None:
                                                                                print(inData[3] + inData[2]*256)
                                                                                average = average + inData[3] + inData[2]*256
                                                                                counter = counter + 1
                                                                                if (counter > 9):
                                                                                        done = True
                                                                                        average = average / 10
                                
                                                                if watchdog is not None:
                                                                        watchdog()
                                
                                                        print("AVERAGE: ", totalsteps, ", ", average,  flush=True)
                                                        backwardsdata[totalsteps] = average;
                                
                                                        # now do a step
                                                        GPIO.output(12, GPIO.HIGH)
                                                        time.sleep(0.0001)
                                                        GPIO.output(12, GPIO.LOW)
                                                        time.sleep(1)
                                                        totalsteps = totalsteps - 1
                                
                                                for i in range( len(backwardsdata) ):
                                                        print(i, forwarddata[i], backwardsdata[i], forwarddata[i] - backwardsdata[i])
                                
                                        except pyprofibus.ProfibusError as e:
                                                print("Terminating: %s" % str(e))
                                                return 1
                                        finally:
                                                GPIO.cleanup()
                                                if master:
                                                        master.destroy()
                                        return 0
                                
                                if __name__ == "__main__":
                                        import sys
                                        sys.exit(main())
                                

                                The "off by one" is imho "not a problem" as if you look at the printout ..

                                0 20828.0 0 20828.0
                                1 20835.0 20869.0 -34.0
                                2 20840.0 20876.0 -36.0
                                ...
                                398 23964.0 23972.0 -8.0
                                399 23972.0 23976.0 -4.0
                                400 0 23979.0 -23979.0
                                

                                you see that firs read is 20828.0, 0 - so going backwards I did not read backwards at all, and last read is 0, 23979.0 so going forward I didn't read that one ...

                                also you see the "end" going forward it goes up (last dataset, for the TMC driver it's reversed)

                                23964.0
                                23972.0

                                then first read backwards (actually it was not stepped backwards yet that's position after last step forward)
                                23979.0 so larger than 23972

                                and then it goes down again
                                23976.0
                                23972.0

                                also, if you look how error is down to nothing when you just turn direction and how it rises... takes some 20+ steps in reverse for error to catch up the average values..

                                First step back the error is 0.02 degrees

                                alankilianundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • arhiundefined
                                  arhi
                                  last edited by arhi

                                  I managed to get S42B v1.0 to work (no clue how any more), now it's running in closedloop mode too so waiting for results... interesting - I have no clue what microstepping it is running at, lcd configured 1/32 but what it is actually doing - no clue, will run the original one direction full circle after this back-forth finish

                                  need to find my vallder (leadshine clone) .. dunno where I put the darn thing in this chaos

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • arhiundefined
                                    arhi
                                    last edited by arhi

                                    S42B V1.0 - in closed loop mode def does not work ok .. having ton of issues with it, was not working at all, now it moves but .. the worse part is it's not even showing that there is an error here 😞 .. other ppl also report issues with it so won't waste more time on it 😞 ..

                                    eaeacdc8-460c-424c-b13b-d6fbe57fe014-image.png

                                    s42b-closedloop-back-forth.txt

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • alankilianundefined
                                      alankilian @arhi
                                      last edited by

                                      @arhi said in stepper precision:

                                      if you look how error is down to nothing when you just turn direction and how it rises... takes some 20+ steps in reverse for error to catch up the average values..

                                      If I'm understanding you correctly, that's probably the flexibility in your tape/ziptie connection causing "backlash"

                                      When I move datapoints around to fake-eliminate that backlash (if that's what it is) I get a very nice chart of error values.

                                      Untitled.png

                                      SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

                                      arhiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • arhiundefined
                                        arhi @alankilian
                                        last edited by

                                        @alankilian said in stepper precision:

                                        If I'm understanding you correctly, that's probably the flexibility in your tape/ziptie connection causing "backlash"

                                        very possible. I tested 10 steps back/forth and was getting values 0-2 for error so assumed that's it but looks like it's not holding water... darn encoder have shaft larger than nema17 and smaller than 8mm so none of my couplers fit.. ordered some new but..

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • arhiundefined
                                          arhi
                                          last edited by arhi

                                          S42B, closed loop mode - changed menu to 1/16 (from 1/32) and let it calibrate again

                                          0bf952ee-09b7-404f-bfca-f8656f5306f0-image.png

                                          s42b-closedloop-back-forth-go2.txt

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • arhiundefined
                                            arhi
                                            last edited by

                                            enough for now, need to stiffen this coupling

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA