Requests for help: Gcode cam follower/ tangential knife control.

Kulitorum

Well, my machine is a lot larger then yours, so comparing acceleration and jerk settings don't really make much sense.

Yes, I use G1 for everything, and have the U coordinate together with my XY coordinates. Ofcause my U coordinate is a tangent to a half vector between the line before and the line after the vertex, so you need to do some calculation there. You will need to have the coords XYU on the same line to get anything smooth. Increase your jerk until you start loosing steps, then increase your power on each motor until they reach 50-60c and lower the jerk until it don't fail no more.

Hope this helps. If you need more help, setup remote control of your computer and a webcam, and I can control your computer and we can adjust it together over skype

Kulitorum

dc42

@kulitorum said in Requests for help: Gcode cam follower/ tangential knife control.:

I tried to use G2 and G3 but they are not interpolated very nice in current firmware and pausing during a G2 or G3 messes up and the printhead moves in random directions. I talked to dc42 about this, but I guess the current use of G2 and G3 is too low for him to spend time with it.

Have you tried using G2/G3 with recent firmware versions? If you still have problems with G2/G3 when using firmware 2.02RC2, please let me know what they are.

dc42

@russ-gries said in Requests for help: Gcode cam follower/ tangential knife control.:

Can you explain this rounding error.
What is the maximum amount of numbers after the decimal place i can have for the axis?

The calculations are done using 32-bit floating point values. See https://www.exploringbinary.com/decimal-precision-of-binary-floating-point-numbers/ for info about the precision.

Danal

Quite a bit has been said since the original question... still, if it helps:

@russ-gries said in Requests for help: Gcode cam follower/ tangential knife control.:

@danal said in Requests for help: Gcode cam follower/ tangential knife control.:

Russ,

Given David's answer that RepRap does not distinguish axis, and given that G-Code (and RepRap) ensure that all axis in a given single move reach their individual endpoints in sync, this all adds up to doing EXACTLY what you want for a coil winder.

That is, if the current XYZ position of the "control point" is somwhere around a coil, ready to make the next coil, and the U axis is "pointed aft" to correctly lay the wire, then a G2 arc move that specifies a next XY 1/4 of the way around the coil, and a U that specifies 90 degrees from where U starts (in the correct positive or negative direction)... that move will smoothly rotate U as XY accelerate, move, deccelerate.

Personally, I'd do 1/4 arcs while debugging so that you can "see" what is happening better.... but once you've confirmed how this all should work, and "good" g-code, then G2 moves that do full circles, one entire coil per G2 line, should be easy.

This is all very hard to put into words... does it make sense?

p.s. I'd still recommend you define your rotational axis as A (not U). This is a widespread standard for extra axis in CNC. It also MIGHT make the Web interface display it better.

Hi Danal,

Thanks for all your feed back,

what your saying makes sense. but let me get something correct.

If i send "G2 X90.6 Y13.8 I5 J10 U45"

David is saying that as the arc move is happening, The U will slowly move around the arc. and the motion will be fluid on the U along the direction of the arc?

Yes, that is the correct fundamental idea.

however, doing it point to point i will need to add the U on the line before the move so i know its going in the right direction. correct?

I would phrase it more as "U is needed on every line". Same idea.

Danal

@russ-gries said in Requests for help: Gcode cam follower/ tangential knife control.:

Also, are you able to make a simple script program that has an in interface for such a G code generator?

Probably. Let me "check assumptions" on my end. Inputs to such a generator for "cylindrical" coil wraps would need to be:

Core diameter (what the wire would be wrapped around, even if removed post wrapping).
Core "length" or "height". In other words, first wrap at z=0 and last wrap at Z=this parameter.
Wire diameter
Number of layers
Packing - even or offset (see below)
Fudge factor for packing density. Could be called "tightness".

What else?

Even Packing:

OOO   OOO
OOO   OOO
OOO   OOO
OOO   OOO
OOO   OOO
OOO   OOO

Offset Packing(would really be half spaced, characters will not show that properly)

OOO    OOO
 OOO  OOO
OOO    OOO
 OOO  OOO
OOO    OOO
 OOO  OOO
OOO    OOO
 OOO  OOO

And, is there a need for "non cylindrical" winds? Donut/Torus or similar? Those are probably beyond a simple script. Examples:

     OO    OO
    OOO    OOO
  OOOOO    OOOOO
 OOOOOO    OOOOOO
  OOOOO    OOOOO
   OOOO    OOOO
     OO    OO

     OO    OO
   OOO      OOO
 OOOO        OOOO
OOO            OOO
 OOOO        OOOO
   OOO      OOO
     OO    OO

Russ Gries

Thanks for the feedback everyone. I will reply to comments sooner than later I hope.

In the meantime I decided to use a stepper motor directly as my tool end. This mainly to reduce any backlash and confusion between how many steps per revolution Ect. Right now I'm using an unknown stepper motor with a very large gear reduction which I cannot tune correctly. (I also re built it for bipolar). It also has a tremendous amount of backlash in the gears and renders it almost useless for this application. It's also not fast enough so I decided to dig through my Box of steppers and I found these really nice point 9ﾟ steppers. I ended up drilling a hole down the center and I'm going to attach my tool end directly on the shaft. This is a nema 17 which is quite large and heavy, but this is to prove the concept it will work, and because it was free in my bin of parts.

Yeah that hole sucked to drill... but i got it!!

Here's a few photos
I'll post more later
Thanks
~Russ

Russ Gries

Ok, still haven't had time to sit down and respond to posts... will do shortly.

However i have managed to get this done.

https://youtu.be/lqoa55_MOiY

A proper video will be posted on my main YT when its time...

~Russ

Russ Gries

One step closer...

https://youtu.be/2Jksxj-7JEM

https://youtu.be/5zuiqzTgi_U

But still alot to do.

~Russ

Russ Gries

@danal said in Requests for help: Gcode cam follower/ tangential knife control.:

@russ-gries said in Requests for help: Gcode cam follower/ tangential knife control.:

Also, are you able to make a simple script program that has an in interface for such a G code generator?

Probably. Let me "check assumptions" on my end. Inputs to such a generator for "cylindrical" coil wraps would need to be:

Core diameter (what the wire would be wrapped around, even if removed post wrapping).

Core "length" or "height". In other words, first wrap at z=0 and last wrap at Z=this parameter.

Wire diameter

Number of layers

Packing - even or offset (see below)

Fudge factor for packing density. Could be called "tightness".

What else?

Even Packing:
OOO   OOO
OOO   OOO
OOO   OOO
OOO   OOO
OOO   OOO
OOO   OOO
Offset Packing(would really be half spaced, characters will not show that properly)
OOO    OOO
 OOO  OOO
OOO    OOO
 OOO  OOO
OOO    OOO
 OOO  OOO
OOO    OOO
 OOO  OOO
And, is there a need for "non cylindrical" winds? Donut/Torus or similar? Those are probably beyond a simple script. Examples:
     OO    OO
    OOO    OOO
  OOOOO    OOOOO
 OOOOOO    OOOOOO
  OOOOO    OOOOO
   OOOO    OOOO
     OO    OO
   
     OO    OO
   OOO      OOO
 OOOO        OOOO
OOO            OOO
 OOOO        OOOO
   OOO      OOO
     OO    OO
   

I will sendyou a PM and descuss this further!!

Thanks
~Russ

Russ Gries

wow, that's all i have to say...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPXUmXTCtok
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aq7Zv-7jEf8

~Russ

Russ Gries

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfoMRPy4bJk

still a lot more to do... but its looking good.

~Russ

Russ Gries

47.5 AWG wire. about 1000 turns, 4.186 Kohms. That's a lot of resistance!

Its funny you cant even see the wire going in to the tool...

not to bad. got a bit of a slip there in the center.... more to tune still. also the roller play's a roll. Get it... ha,
on i'm slap happy...

God Bless,
~Russ

Russ Gries

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmNTSxDMqxM

dc42

Nice! Anyone have any ideas of applications for flat coils? Wireless charging perhaps?

dc42

...yes, wireless charging coils. See https://uk.farnell.com/w/c/passive-components/inductors/charging-coils/prl/results?st=wireless+charging+coils.

Alexander Mundy

Off the top of my head, besides wireless charging: VLF radio. Magnetic radio for underground (cave, tunnel, etc) to surface communication. With larger gauge and some spacing, bed heat for a delta or polar, or induction heating. Metal detector coil.

jot4p

Hi @Russ-Gries ,

Fantastic topic.

So, you use Duet3d wifi with RepRapFirmware correct ?

What is your gcode generator /slicer ?

You create a script to run your gcode and change the values ? Do you have more information about your post processor ?

Thanks

Russ Gries

Hello,

Just about everything is documented on this playlist. :

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsiIKXpZfLKI-UXGFdXYS2groWniI-Eh5

If you want to know why i built it. Its to build this:

https://youtu.be/ivPsGxCXyPA

And test some theories...

~Russ

jot4p

@russ-gries

Yes, I follow you on YouTube

so, in this video you use Fusion 360, after that you use Simplify3D correct ? But you create a script to adjust the xyz to xyzU correct (U/A the angle of extruder 1), do you have some documentation ? or a start point for me (forum/ paper etc.. ?) I need to do the same for a concrete 3D printer.

I know that it is possible to do it automatically with Mach3 but I would like to try to do it myself.

At this moment I use Autodesk Inventor + PrinterRun (www.pronterface.com/) , it's possible to create scripts / macros with python to create the "final GCode".

My idea is change the rapms 1.4 (3d printer mainboard) by Duet3D and adjust this code to create the "tangential control" .

How do you adapt the Duet3D to create a U axis ? (the new "Extruder" axis ) ?

Thanks.