Hi I just had the idea it ould be awsome if the path to a spcific value would be copied in the object model plugin just by clicking on it. That way one could look for the value he needs and then copy and paste it into his gcode.
Greetings TC
Hi I just had the idea it ould be awsome if the path to a spcific value would be copied in the object model plugin just by clicking on it. That way one could look for the value he needs and then copy and paste it into his gcode.
Greetings TC
For those who might be interested
I found a solution: Right after the M582 a couple of M400 commands have to be included. It looks like one needs as many M400 as there are G1 commands in the trigger file. It is more a workaround than a clean solution, but works fine for me
I am using Slic3r. Actually it seams I identified the problem. Slic3r had a threshold of layer time above which it turnes off the cooling. On my object that happened exactly in these layers which had the bottom structure for the wider screw hole... but is it possible ghe absence of cooling makes such a difference on the outer surface?
You have indent every line Inside the if Statement
@fcwilt its the analog input value provided by the untouched piezo sensor
Nice work around
Thx David!
Hi I noticed that the printer allways makes an automatic move to the saved return point after a tool change. Is that intended and necessary? I mean everone is free to have such a command at the end of tpost.g. For me it is makes everything more complicated... maybe it could be made an optional thing?
Greetings
TC
Hi I just had the idea it ould be awsome if the path to a spcific value would be copied in the object model plugin just by clicking on it. That way one could look for the value he needs and then copy and paste it into his gcode.
Greetings TC
@koreandi first you should manually switch between Tools using T0 P0 and T1 P0 and check if the Coordinates displayed in DWC change as expected
@deckingman You are right there are other ways to achieve it. I am asking also to maybe help improving the Firmware and if the purpose is to load and unload then still it is logic to assign the same type to multiple extruders
@deckingman yes that is true but still I don't understand the purpose of this limitation. When I assign a filanent to a tool I want it to know the print Parameters and nothing more. Why should I even want to create filaments of different colors?
Hi I am working with RRF filament assignment again and still can not understand why it is not possible to assign the same filament type to multiple extruders. Is there any reason for this and if not could it be changed? Or what exactly is the idea how to tell the firmware it has two PLA tools?
greetings
TC
@dc42 Ah that is a nice idea. What would be the best way to store this information about a former retraction in RRF 3.1.1?
And are there more than 3 restore points? if so I could save the last position for each tool so it could go back to where this exact tool left the print last time.