Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Predator Project - The Mjolnir -

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    My Duet controlled machine
    7
    16
    1.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • thor3kundefined
      thor3k
      last edited by thor3k

      Hi guys, I would like to show you what I'm working on.
      I'm trying to collect here, in one place the troubles I have and what I've found on this forum.

      some info first:

      I start working on my Anycubic Predator in march, here what will be the final result: Anycubic_Predator_MM.png

      The upgrade consist in:

      -Duet3 Board + Panel I7* + Raspberry Pi4
      -Double extruder
      -Maxiwatt hotend heater *
      -BLtouch V3 *
      -Magnetic joint ยน
      -linear bearings (rails)

      -nema17 (0.9ยฐ)*
      -Liquid cooling for extruders and (if possible) for motors
      -... and other small things ...

      Anycubic_Predator_MM_est.png
      Anycubic_Predator_MM_est_sez.png
      Anycubic_Predator_MM_est2.png
      Anycubic_Predator_MM_rail.png

      *this is already done...
      ยน I placed again the standard rods because as you will read, I've some troubles leveling the base

      Now consider I'm working with the standard Anycubic extruder configuration: 1 extruder with flying motor (only maxiwatt heater and BL touch V3 upgrades are applied)

      Major issues I've now is regarding the leveling, tomorrow I'll try to explain as well as possible what I do, trying to understand with you what is wrong. I've no doubt on rods lenght, but is not clear for me the endstop regulation

      I anticipate you that I've read the following post found in this forum:

      https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/13097/endstop-calibration-for-delta?_=1597433494622
      https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/9741/wavy-ridges-in-mesh-bed-leveling-on-delta-kossel-xl/2

      and this nice document:
      http://boim.com/DeltaUtil/CalDoc/Calibration.html

      but all my trials following the suggestions wrote, goes bad...

      the best result I get with this config:
      config.g
      homedelta.g
      bed.g

      is this Heightmap:
      heightmap.csv

      98d6eba2-6a92-4852-8e58-5c62f066ad13-image.png

      4f2b18d4-3c6c-4b5d-9a71-ecd9d5920c4a-image.png
      and this is the beginning of print:

      0b54a1b6-46e2-4c6a-8cbd-424ccf0d846d.jpg

      in the red area (positive Y) the extruder is very closer to the base, (on big Y values it touch the bed ๐Ÿ˜ฐ ).
      green area is the reverse, little bit far from the bed (doesn't stich well to the surface) (I will take a better picture with white PLA, is more clear)

      I don't understand yet where to work first... firmware or hardware...

      Is the first time I made something at this level, probably i'm missing something stupid (I'm sure ๐Ÿ˜ณ )

      Any kind of suggestion are well accepted.

      thank you guys,

      Marco

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dc42undefined
        dc42 administrators
        last edited by dc42

        I presume you have read https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Calibrating_a_delta_printer.

        Offset Z probes such as BLTouch do not work well on delta printers. They are sensitive to effector tilt (which alters the relative height of the Z probe and the nozzle, hence the effective trigger height), and it's very difficult to eliminate effector tilt completely. To make them work at all on a delta, you need to measure the trigger height (nozzle height above bed) at every auto calibration point using feeler gauges, and apply the differences between those measurements and the trigger height at the reference position (normally bed centre) as H parameter corrections on the G30 commands in bed.g. This is tedious, and needs to be re-done any time you make a change that might alter the calibration.

        Nozzle-contact Z probes are much more satisfactory on deltas.

        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

        thor3kundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • thor3kundefined
          thor3k @dc42
          last edited by

          @dc42
          "I presume you have read https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Calibrating_a_delta_printer." Yes sorry I forgot... it was the first one when I start installing duet board on my predator ๐Ÿ˜Š

          Honestly I thought the BL touch was not the best, also because as you can see, it has a great offset from the effector center axis (46mm), I thing by the geometry this can be one of the reasons it is not a good solution.
          4555e6b4-ea8c-4dd1-8537-2543186812f7.jpg

          Nozzle contact probe (I think you're speaking about piezo probe) was one of the first solution i thought but i was scared about the mechanical application on my effector, especially looking forward for the double extruder mod...

          Here the promised update i've done today:

          As you can see here, the printing is quite well in the center of the bed, become far in negative Y cordinates and too closer on positive Y cordinate...
          64b63d62-9f35-47b8-8811-023c1ec1a50a.jpg

          Here the actual effector configuration:

          6b1e7223-98cc-47be-92d1-6959f126a426.jpg

          3f4d5341-285c-4471-ac04-8d5f2f3b91c0.jpg

          e48d3f18-6fca-4a41-ba3f-29af8084813f.jpg

          ... Next step: design new effector for Piezo probe.

          You think guys it'll need other mod, due to this new design?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • thor3kundefined
            thor3k
            last edited by

            I forgot the other option, Piezo on bed. Here I think we have 2 roads:

            Piezo under the bed (but i'm scared when i need to probe for ABS (bed @90/100ยฐC, i think piezo suffer at that temperature.

            Piezo under the bed support... but how many and where on ultrabase shape?

            suggestions?

            thanks again guys

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • dc42undefined
              dc42 administrators
              last edited by

              Piezo in the print head mounting or on the effector may be another possibility.

              Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
              Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
              http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Former User?
                A Former User
                last edited by

                Smart effector is also an elegant solution, but with the dual extruder you pretty much have to eliminate effector tilt and in that case bltouch should also work reasonably well?

                zaptaundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • zaptaundefined
                  zapta @A Former User
                  last edited by zapta

                  @bearer said in Predator Project - The Mjolnir -:

                  but with the dual extruder you pretty much have to eliminate effector tilt

                  My experience with dual nozzles is that it's very difficult to prevent one from interfering with the printing by the other.

                  I wonder if the 'tiltability' of delta printers can be used to address it. E.g. on tool change, tilting the non active nozzle up such that it is not interfering with piezo measurement or printing by the other nozzle.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • thor3kundefined
                    thor3k
                    last edited by

                    Hi Everybody, thank you for the suggestions and sharing your experiences.

                    what I learned is to say bye bye to my BLtouch (i will recycle it on my ender 3 ๐Ÿ˜ฌ )

                    I designed new bed support to place piezo (Precision piezo kit ร˜20mm):

                    6f650e35-67b2-4c82-80c9-94556d5720e9-image.png

                    46816725-468b-4f0b-abe5-0a118f4b0396-image.png

                    30563185-384d-4648-9697-80ea3f40584b-image.png

                    1a1b5a31-3cbf-45e2-9082-5d6c84082f99-image.png

                    ...and problably i will move to a new print head solution to prevent tilt issues:

                    9dab07eb-78f7-4592-b34d-825a55ea8505-image.png

                    i will design a special cooler to proceed with my liquid cooling idea and create a compact effector...

                    hope you like it and i'm on the right way now.. ๐Ÿ˜‰ thanks guys!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • zaptaundefined
                      zapta
                      last edited by zapta

                      I am waiting for the day when our 3D printers will be as pretty as their CAD renderings.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • thor3kundefined
                        thor3k
                        last edited by

                        here we go....!

                        20f83983-cf11-4ffc-be58-83d7e1ed6310.jpg

                        3983686e-fbce-4ba2-88de-2043db8507d0.jpg

                        instead of what drawed before, I made (due to supplier wrong shipment) the ร˜27 piezo support, probably more sensitive ๐Ÿ˜‰

                        here a short preview,
                        https://youtu.be/zSb38aC-XgE

                        looks good:

                        g32.jpg

                        But unfortunatelly I don't understand this mesh... really don't...
                        dd5e4b36-c529-42f2-87bd-a7b9c8042c2b-image.png

                        I will check again geometry and road lenght with a caliber...

                        wait for your comments

                        dc42undefined sebxtremeundefined bbergerundefined 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • dc42undefined
                          dc42 administrators @thor3k
                          last edited by

                          @thor3k, that height map with ridges at one end of the X direction turning into valleys at the other end is a beautiful example of the effects of backlash in the joints of a delta printer.

                          Try lubricating the joints.

                          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • thor3kundefined
                            thor3k
                            last edited by

                            Thank you dc42, I thought it depend of bad geometries.. is something I saw on first tests, I remember (se my first post) it goes better when I goes back from magnetic joints to the original ball eye rod joints..

                            I will check the lubrification on my mag balls...

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • dc42undefined
                              dc42 administrators
                              last edited by

                              Btw sticktion in the carriage or belts too loose would also cause that pattern in the height map.

                              Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                              Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                              http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • veryevilundefined
                                veryevil
                                last edited by

                                Hi, how's this project going? I'm interested in the piezo mounts. Does the heated bed float on them or is it screwed down? Do you have a place you are putting the files as I would really like something similar for mine.

                                Thanks

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • sebxtremeundefined
                                  sebxtreme @thor3k
                                  last edited by

                                  @thor3k hi , I would make this mod too on my predator , can you share the stl file for mount the piezo Undermath ?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • bbergerundefined
                                    bberger @thor3k
                                    last edited by

                                    @thor3k I'd be interested in the mounts - would you mind sharing them?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA