Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Impossible to set extruder micro stepping above 16ms

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Tuning and tweaking
    8
    39
    1.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • observatoerundefined
      observatoer @Phaedrux
      last edited by

      @Phaedrux said in Impossible to set extruder micro stepping above 16ms:

      Here's how I do it to keep it simple

      M350 X16 Y16 Z16 E16 I1; set x16 microstepping with interpolation
      M92 X80 Y80 Z400 E411 ; steps per mm set as if for x16 microstepping
      M350 E64 ; alter microstepping for E axis

      firmware now correctly calculates the new steps per mm required.

      The key is to set everything for x16 first and don't change your M92, just have it set to work with x16. Then you can modify the microstepping after and it will correctly calculate.

      I did exactly this and the machine reported exactly these values back which is correct. BUT, as soon as I start a print job, ONLY the value for the extruder E is reset to the 16 micro stepping value!
      I checked all possible macros who could alter the setting during start, but non of them includes M350 or M92 values.

      Something is definitely not working on my machine. I have changed the stepper already but as you see, same issue. I have also made a new sd card for the PI and did the latest test with these sw. I'm hesitant to build new config files at the moment.

      Still same status: This new setting is not working properly on my machine.

      JoergS5undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JoergS5undefined
        JoergS5 @observatoer
        last edited by

        @observatoer can you please check config-override.g and the start codes of the printed g-code file, maybe they are changing the E setting. Do the startup macros include M501 maybe?

        observatoerundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • observatoerundefined
          observatoer @JoergS5
          last edited by

          @JoergS5 Did this in the beginning of the test already. I cleared the content of it and omitted the loading in config.g.

          JoergS5undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JoergS5undefined
            JoergS5 @observatoer
            last edited by JoergS5

            @observatoer you seem to use IdeaMaker, is there something in the startup code which could change E?
            https://forum.raise3d.com/viewtopic.php?t=12893
            https://support.raise3d.com/ideaMaker/5-1-3-13-gcode-15-445.html
            especially the "Extruder Switch GCode tab". Lot of places to change something...

            observatoerundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • observatoerundefined
              observatoer @JoergS5
              last edited by observatoer

              @JoergS5 Thanks for the hint, but I have removed all the default settings in Ideamaker from the start code and call a start macro on the duet3. This is all that remains:

              M98 P"0:/sys/print/start.g" ; call start.g

              M290 R0 S0 ;reset babystepping
              M290 S-0.05 ; set babystepping height delta

              M572 D0 S0.025 ;set pressure advance

              And nothing in the extruder level. Totally empty.

              JoergS5undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JoergS5undefined
                JoergS5 @observatoer
                last edited by

                @observatoer next I would check content of start.g and if babystepping or pressue advance change the E by disabling them.

                observatoerundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • observatoerundefined
                  observatoer @JoergS5
                  last edited by observatoer

                  @JoergS5 Looks OK to me.

                  G29 S1 P"heightmap.csv" ; Load the height map from file and activate bed compensation.
                  G90 ; use absolute coordinates
                  M83 ; extruder relative mode

                  M98 P"0:/sys/G828.g" ; home if not homed
                  M98 P"0:/sys/G832.g" ; if not already leveled, level bed and re-home Z

                  ; prime nozzle
                  G1 X0 Y0 F99999.0 ; Go home
                  G1 Z0.15 ; lower extruder

                  G1 X2 Y20 Z0.3 F5000.0 ; move to start-line position
                  G1 X2 Y200.0 Z0.3 F1500.0 E15 ; draw 1st line
                  G1 X2 Y200.0 Z0.4 F5000.0 ; move to side a little
                  G1 X3 Y20 Z0.4 F1500.0 E30 ; draw 2nd line
                  G92 E0.0

                  And the two calls look clean, too:

                  ; G828.g
                  ; Conditional variant of G28 home command.
                  ; Homes all axes if not already homed.
                  if !move.axes[0].homed || !move.axes[1].homed || !move.axes[2].homed
                  G28

                  ; G832.g
                  ; Conditional variant of G32 bed command.
                  ; Perform bed leveling if not already leveled.
                  if move.calibration.numFactors == 0 ; if leveling has not yet been performed...
                  G32 ; level bed
                  G28 Z ; re-home Z
                  else
                  echo "Bed already leveled. Skipping..."

                  JoergS5undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JoergS5undefined
                    JoergS5 @observatoer
                    last edited by

                    @observatoer then I have no more ideas at the moment. I would remove and disable or comment out all and readd step by step to find the reason. It is also possible that there is a bug somewhere, because you have a lot of settings, macros etc. To be sure it's not IdeaMaker I would try a different program and g-code file first.

                    observatoerundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • observatoerundefined
                      observatoer @JoergS5
                      last edited by

                      @JoergS5 Thank you for your time and hints!

                      JoergS5undefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JoergS5undefined
                        JoergS5 @observatoer
                        last edited by JoergS5

                        @observatoer sorry that I could not help. I think it's something trivial, a syntax error e.g., but I didn't see one.

                        Maybe M350 E16 I0 changing the E without interpolation behaves other than expected. You could try changing it to I1 as a test.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JoergS5undefined
                          JoergS5 @observatoer
                          last edited by JoergS5

                          @observatoer I have one more idea: according the information in some threads like https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/4939/m350-not-working-wrt-m584/6 the order of the drives seem to play a role in the M584 command. In you config you have E first, so this may not be seen as an extruder drive in some code for other program parts. You could try changing
                          M584 E0 X1 Y2 Z3:4:5
                          to
                          M584 X1 Y2 Z3:4:5 E0

                          observatoerundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • dc42undefined
                            dc42 administrators
                            last edited by

                            If anyone thinks that M350 is not behaving as described in the wiki GCodes page, please supply files that replicate the different behaviour.

                            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                            observatoerundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • observatoerundefined
                              observatoer @JoergS5
                              last edited by

                              @JoergS5 That would make sense and I will give it a try. Stii the change will be a bag of hurt to get the order of the z drives and the related measurements for ABL right.
                              Thank you very much for your help! I will report, how this turns out.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • observatoerundefined
                                observatoer @dc42
                                last edited by

                                @dc42 I guess, this tread is full of all related logs and describes the issue in detail. Still I understand, it's a pain to go thru the logs.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • dc42undefined
                                  dc42 administrators
                                  last edited by dc42

                                  One of the reports says that the steps/mm changes when starting a print, but I didn't see a print file posted. Also, the config files have changed, so it's hard to be sure what the current ones look like.

                                  Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                  Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                  http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                  observatoerundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • observatoerundefined
                                    observatoer @dc42
                                    last edited by

                                    @dc42 Thank you, this was the right question.
                                    Ideamaker is setting the E value to 822s/mm and writes this at the beginning of the code.
                                    That was the reason, why this issue came up.

                                    Thanks again and I guess, the solution is found.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA