Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Tips to mitigate vertical artifacting Duet 2 Wifi

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Tuning and tweaking
    12
    91
    8.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • brotherchrisundefined
      brotherchris @fcwilt
      last edited by

      @fcwilt It's not that I think it's too small, I just wanted a little larger hardware on this setup.

      Vetiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Phaedruxundefined
        Phaedrux Moderator @brotherchris
        last edited by

        @brotherchris said in Tips to mitigate vertical artifacting Duet 2 Wifi:

        I need to find some toothed pullies that will fit my setup.

        I was able to do a few belt twists to run the smooth side of the belt over my flanged bearings. When I tried toothed idlers there was still a lot of ridges. I think the small 16T idlers are just too tight of a bend for the teeth to mesh smoothly. I was able to have the belt twists on the fixed length sections between the motor and the rear idlers.

        Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

        brotherchrisundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • Vetiundefined
          Veti @brotherchris
          last edited by

          @brotherchris said in Tips to mitigate vertical artifacting Duet 2 Wifi:

          It's not that I think it's too small, I just wanted a little larger hardware on this setup.

          ok then here you go.
          https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32961693003.html
          its 8mm bore.
          but the diameter is larger than the F688ZZ

          brotherchrisundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • brotherchrisundefined
            brotherchris @Phaedrux
            last edited by

            @Phaedrux Run a test with a belt twist now.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • brotherchrisundefined
              brotherchris @Veti
              last edited by

              @Veti Nice find, I am going to grab some for testing.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • brotherchrisundefined
                brotherchris @Phaedrux
                last edited by

                @Phaedrux Still confused, the belt flip didn't change anything.

                Phaedruxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Phaedruxundefined
                  Phaedrux Moderator @brotherchris
                  last edited by

                  @brotherchris said in Tips to mitigate vertical artifacting Duet 2 Wifi:

                  @Phaedrux Still confused, the belt flip didn't change anything.

                  Well that's one more thing to cross off the list and leaves stepper artifacts. I wonder if it's related to the exoslide movement? Is there more or less resistance to motion with it?

                  Were you able to print a test that varied the speed over a range to try and see if there is a speed which doesn't excite the artifacts?

                  Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                  brotherchrisundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • botundefined
                    bot
                    last edited by bot

                    What I.D. would you prefer for a toothed idler? Also, what effective O.D. are you aiming for? (to keep the belts aligned)

                    I agree it's too hard to find the right idlers, but Misumi has a few options I could try and find something for you.

                    *not actually a robot

                    brotherchrisundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • brotherchrisundefined
                      brotherchris @bot
                      last edited by

                      @bot Most of the bearing are 8mm ID and 16 OD. I have 2 that are 8mm ID 12mm OD, 1 in each path to help with clearance.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • brotherchrisundefined
                        brotherchris @Phaedrux
                        last edited by

                        @Phaedrux The max speed test is interesting. Started at lower speeds. As it got faster the ringing increased, the artifact stayed the same.20201006_095038.jpg 20201006_095032.jpg 20201006_095027.jpg

                        Phaedruxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • botundefined
                          bot
                          last edited by bot

                          Well, I wasn't able to find any ready-to-go off-the-shelf idlers from Misumi (that are more than 5 or 6 mm), but I've always wanted to try using one of their customizable pulleys for idlers: See info here.

                          You can choose a wide range of sizes of pulley there, and you can get stepped holes made which should allow for easy placement of bearings. They have a variety of options and you can have the stepped hole sized how you wish. See:

                          Misumiidler1.png

                          Misumiidler2.png

                          [Edit: this photo is slightly misleading, there are more options to configure to get a full part number. Still playing around with it 😛 ]

                          *not actually a robot

                          sebkritikelundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • sebkritikelundefined
                            sebkritikel @bot
                            last edited by sebkritikel

                            @bot said in Tips to mitigate vertical artifacting Duet 2 Wifi:

                            Well, I wasn't able to find any ready-to-go off-the-shelf idlers from Misumi (that are more than 5 or 6 mm), but I've always wanted to try using one of their customizable pulleys for idlers: See info here.

                            You can choose a wide range of sizes of pulley there, and you can get stepped holes made which should allow for easy placement of bearings. They have a variety of options and you can have the stepped hole sized how you wish. See:

                            snip

                            [Edit: this photo is slightly misleading, there are more options to configure to get a full part number. Still playing around with it 😛 ]

                            I've done that on my machine, and it works quite well (albeit the assembly stackup can get pricy quick!). Must carefully select parts based on all the appropriate parameters.
                            287ae057-3ed8-45f7-94a9-b8da2c7162ef-image.png

                            Something to look out for is there is an issue on Misumi's site it seems, where you cannot select all the options on the left side (for example, with the Gates MR2 page, the "T" parameter does not show up. As an example, filling out all the available options can give you "GPA30MR2090-A-Y4-Q6-R6-S3", so copying and pasting that P/N with the addition of "-T3" into the search pulls up a real part.

                            For this case, do we want GT2/GT3 (Gates MR) or the 2GT series?
                            Looking at 2GT
                            Looks like something like 26teeth would match the 16mm OD (16.04mm OD, 16.55 PD). However the max 'shaft' hole for this size is 6mm, and the max counterbore is 8mm. However, it looks like the site gets stuck at GPA26GT2060-A-Y6, and we cannot configure past that.

                            Large(ish?) IDEX - 6HC, 1HCL
                            Stratasys Dimension 1200es to 6HC Conversion

                            theruttmeisterundefined botundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • sebkritikelundefined
                              sebkritikel
                              last edited by sebkritikel

                              @brotherchris this happens with thin wall (one or two wall/perimeter only) prints correct (I'm sure the answer is yes, but I want to ask). What you could do, to see if it is an extruder issue, is print a hollow square pyramid (maybe with the top cut off) or cone. Probably should keep the print speed consistent throughout the print. What this should, I think, test, is if the "candy stripes" will maintain the same pattern (straight diagonals) or change style, by varying the layer cross section as height increases. I think that, if it is an extruder issue, the diagonal artifacts will turn into curves.

                              Horrible PowerPoint diagram - what is happening now
                              23088bba-5a81-4183-a485-5305b1251e27-image.png

                              What I would expect to happen (not exactly haha)
                              99bdd4bd-cc7c-4a0a-82cc-ebe18d1b31e1-image.png

                              Large(ish?) IDEX - 6HC, 1HCL
                              Stratasys Dimension 1200es to 6HC Conversion

                              brotherchrisundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • brotherchrisundefined
                                brotherchris @sebkritikel
                                last edited by

                                @sebkritikel Yes, it seems to happen on all prints. I will print a pyramid and see what it does.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • brotherchrisundefined
                                  brotherchris @mwolter
                                  last edited by

                                  @mwolter Hey I ran these tests and the flow rate definitely impacts the 45 degree lines. This is a .4 and a .47, huge difference. No luck on the verticals. 20201006_153737.jpg 20201006_153748.jpg

                                  theruttmeisterundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Phaedruxundefined
                                    Phaedrux Moderator
                                    last edited by

                                    Disassemble and reassemble the Hemera?

                                    Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                                    brotherchrisundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • brotherchrisundefined
                                      brotherchris @Phaedrux
                                      last edited by

                                      @Phaedrux Never a bad idea.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • theruttmeisterundefined
                                        theruttmeister @sebkritikel
                                        last edited by

                                        @sebkritikel said in Tips to mitigate vertical artifacting Duet 2 Wifi:

                                        For this case, do we want GT2/GT3 (Gates MR) or the 2GT series?
                                        Looking at 2GT

                                        Those are essentially all the same thing. Gates powergrip. GT is the early version, GT2 being a newer stronger belt design, GT3 being the newest (2GT being either GT in 2mm pitch, or GT2 written oddly). They come in anything from 1 to 14mm pitch (with 2mm being the most common in 3D printing).
                                        The tooth profile and the pulleys are all same for a given pitch. Its only the belt construction that changed as far as I know.

                                        Isolate, substitute, verify.

                                        sebkritikelundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
                                        • theruttmeisterundefined
                                          theruttmeister @brotherchris
                                          last edited by

                                          @brotherchris said in Tips to mitigate vertical artifacting Duet 2 Wifi:

                                          @mwolter Hey I ran these tests and the flow rate definitely impacts the 45 degree lines. This is a .4 and a .47, huge difference. No luck on the verticals.

                                          .47 what? Extrusion width? What's the nozzle diameter?

                                          I'd be curious to see if anyone has tried using flat faced extruder drive gears... if what you are seeing changes with flow rate, then it could be a product of variations in effective pitch diameter with the teeth on the drive gears. Might have trouble pushing the filament.
                                          Or if you are running a 0.4 nozzle and were printing at 0.4, then yes, going up to 0.47 will make a huge difference.

                                          Isolate, substitute, verify.

                                          brotherchrisundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • brotherchrisundefined
                                            brotherchris @theruttmeister
                                            last edited by

                                            @theruttmeister I misspoke, I meant extrusion width. It's a .4 nozzle, it was just a test to see the impact.

                                            theruttmeisterundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA