Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    My thoughts on Toolboard 1LC

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Duet Hardware and wiring
    duet 3 duet 3 hc6 toolboard tool board
    10
    15
    1.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • oozeBotundefined
      oozeBot @T3P3Tony
      last edited by

      @T3P3Tony While I haven't watched his video, the idea of a screw terminal version of the toolboard is very appealing to us and something I was going to bring up soon..

      Phaedruxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Phaedruxundefined
        Phaedrux Moderator @oozeBot
        last edited by

        @oozeBot said in My thoughts on Toolboard 1LC:

        the idea of a screw terminal version of the toolboard

        But it does have screw terminals right now. He modified his by replacing them with JST connectors.

        Is that what you meant?

        Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

        oozeBotundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • oozeBotundefined
          oozeBot @Phaedrux
          last edited by

          @Phaedrux my reply was based on what @deckingman had earlier posted.. we are getting pretty good at wiring the small connectors, but I'd be lying if I told you I haven't cussed more than once while doing it.. screw connectors for the stepper and can connection would be so much more straight forward.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A Former User?
            A Former User
            last edited by

            A man after my own heart, a much much better solution for connectors.

            I had this type of connector modification already planned (i just purchased X2 extra tool-boards earlier this week for this purpose)

            In my opinion the smaller screw terminal connectors are as you say just terrible, one issue with the smaller screw terminals is that due to the terminals spacing the plastic shielding on shielded bootlace ferrules are prevented from being secured in the terminal straight.

            If you look at the picture below you can see the issue on the left upper fan connector and on the Z probe connector, on the Thermistor I went with un-shielded because it is just too tight. Squeezing the plastic shielding is not an option to insert the bootlace ferrules and this leads to it detaching from the metal part/

            IMG_20201015_150511.jpg

            My last tool-board wouldn't tighten on the temp connector screws from new (Roland sent me some new connectors F.O.C)

            the smaller crimp connectors are no problem with the correct tools.

            The Jumper idea for the resistor is a good one too.

            dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • dc42undefined
              dc42 administrators @A Former User
              last edited by dc42

              @CaLviNx said in My thoughts on Toolboard 1LC:

              In my opinion the smaller screw terminal connectors are as you say just terrible, one issue with the smaller screw terminals is that due to the terminals spacing the plastic shielding on shielded bootlace ferrules are prevented from being secured in the terminal straight.

              Ferrules are only important on wires that carry a lot of current, i.e. the heater wires. We use a 3.5mm terminal block for those, so there is room for the ferrules.

              The choice between screw terminals and crimp connectors is a difficult one. Crimp connectors are much better for OEMs, but many hobbyists prefer screw terminals. The Molex KK terminals that we use on most boards are too large for this application, especially the right-angle ones. Likewise, a JST VH connector would be too large for the heater output.

              Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
              Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
              http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

              A Former User? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Former User?
                A Former User @dc42
                last edited by A Former User

                @dc42

                Noted and I understand being geared towards the hobby end of the market, and for those of us who like to keep things much more professional looking (we'll as much as possible) that might make case as mentioned before for two versions.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • KarlMarklundundefined
                  KarlMarklund
                  last edited by

                  Thank you all for your comments!

                  @dc42 I do think that screws are easier for some, but as mentioned these are generally difficult to determin the correct torque, thus I have had a lot of those suddenly strip the threads.
                  Even as a hobbyist I do find it more convenient with connectors. There is some more work to do upfront (with crimping the connectors) it is easier to make connectors with the correct order (dont want to deal with reverse polarity or not getting a reading because wire 2 happened to land in port 3).

                  Those screw terminals also have no physical connection to the board except for the terminal connectors, meaning that the torque from screwing have the risk of twisting them.

                  As @deckingman said, one option could be to have a barebones board, though I dont think that is the Duet3D way, as the other boards come with connectors installed.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jmjcokeundefined
                    jmjcoke
                    last edited by

                    I have invested in all the crimpers and various pins and plugs for everything Duet3D and after much practice crimping (especially the smallest plugs on the tool board) I prefer the plugs.

                    Joshua Coke

                    Trick Laser Metal Max with Smart Effector
                    Duet Wifi
                    Zesty Nimble
                    Mosaic Pallette+
                    At work
                    Renishaw AM250/400/ RenAM500M/500Q Powder Bed Fusion (Metal 3D Printers)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • Maboverundefined
                      Mabover
                      last edited by

                      IMHO these style pcb connectors from wago are the better choice for any pcb bare wire, feruled or not, compared to screw terminals
                      https://www.wago.com/us/pcb-interconnect/1-conductor-pcb-terminal-strip/p/250-202
                      No screw torque to figure out, no stripping, no worring that your going to rip the connector off the board when tightening.
                      Cage clamp connectors are all around better than any screw based connection
                      All my boards going forward are getting these style even though they are slightly more expensive

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • matt3oundefined
                        matt3o
                        last edited by

                        I don't have any particular complain about the connectors, I'm pretty easy going on that regard. The very small beige ones are tedious to crimp but fortunately I've purchased the wire-kit.

                        I know it's already pretty small but what I would love is for it to be with one side 40mm max, even sacrificing a connector (or using a smaller one) or dropping the switches.

                        I'm doing a magnetic toolchange with very small heads and I'm having troubles positioning the toolboard (I'm actually thinking of using an expansion 3HC instead of the toolboard).

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA