Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    differences between manual and automatic leveling

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    IR Height Sensor
    10
    41
    2.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • fcwiltundefined
      fcwilt @Gip_86
      last edited by

      @gip_86 said in differences between manual and automatic leveling:

      So and what are the best steps for next?

      Have you made the configuration settings needed to use the Manual Bed Leveling Assistant?

      Manual Bed Leveling Assistant

      Once that is done and the bed is level you should then proceed to get Mesh Bed Compensation working.

      Mesh Bed Compensation

      Frederick

      Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

      Gip_86undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Gip_86undefined
        Gip_86 @fcwilt
        last edited by Gip_86

        @fcwilt
        ok i had done the neeed config and have leveled it. after several leveling, best i could do was about 0,03mm to adjust.

        then i had done a G29 and heres the height map:

        3850a325-a4e5-4402-a4f2-e08e425a578f-image.png

        1d4c2091-f1ec-4bff-a350-f0747dadf08c-image.png

        Any idears?

        fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • fcwiltundefined
          fcwilt @Gip_86
          last edited by fcwilt

          @gip_86

          I have four different printers all with cast aluminum tool plate for the bed and they all are different.

          I haven't taken the time to find out why as they all print ok.

          FT5 Height Map.jpg

          MF1 Height Map.jpg

          SAFPRO Height Map.jpg

          Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

          Gip_86undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Gip_86undefined
            Gip_86 @fcwilt
            last edited by

            @fcwilt

            Ok, I also have a casted aluminium plate which is on both sides milled. I think my FR4 plate is the reason why it is so different. Itโ€™s a bit translucent.

            Tomorrow I will give a try with the mesh.

            fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • fcwiltundefined
              fcwilt @Gip_86
              last edited by

              @gip_86 said in differences between manual and automatic leveling:

              @fcwilt

              Ok, I also have a casted aluminium plate which is on both sides milled. I think my FR4 plate is the reason why it is so different. Itโ€™s a bit translucent.

              Tomorrow I will give a try with the mesh.

              I would agree the FR4 is likely the issue.

              Frederick

              Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

              Gip_86undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Gip_86undefined
                Gip_86 @fcwilt
                last edited by

                @fcwilt

                Yes but itโ€™s a good Surface to print. ๐Ÿ™‚

                Could it help to decrease the probing points?

                Or could it help to do a sanding of it?

                fcwiltundefined engikeneerundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • fcwiltundefined
                  fcwilt @Gip_86
                  last edited by

                  @gip_86 said in differences between manual and automatic leveling:

                  Yes but itโ€™s a good Surface to print. ๐Ÿ™‚

                  I use a number of different print surfaces - all of the removable kind held in place by magnetic force.

                  I like being able to separately chose the bed heater, the bed material and the bed surface - the goal being to have the best combination of parts.

                  Could it help to decrease the probing points?

                  No, that would just hide the errors - to get the best results from using mesh compensation you would increase the number of points

                  Or could it help to do a sanding of it?

                  The changes you see in the height map are actually quite small - sanding would likely make things worse.

                  Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • engikeneerundefined
                    engikeneer @Gip_86
                    last edited by engikeneer

                    @gip_86 as @fcwilt said, I'd increase the probing points a bit. That way you can look for obvious points that are wrong and manually change then in the .csv file

                    You could also use the A and S parameters in your G31 M558 to do repeated probing at different points to improve accuracy.

                    Final point, my heightmap on my corexy is a lot worse than yours because my gantry sags a bit. However, I still get pretty good results with mesh compensation enabled so have not bothered to redesign it. Ultimately what matters is if you get good prints, not whether you have a perfectly flat heightmap (though we'd all love that! ๐Ÿ™‚ )

                    Edit: corrected reference to M558

                    E3D TC with D3Mini and Toolboards.
                    Home-built CoreXY, Duet Wifi, Chimera direct drive, 2x BMG, 300x300x300 build volume
                    i3 clone with a bunch of mods

                    Marcossfundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • Marcossfundefined
                      Marcossf @engikeneer
                      last edited by Marcossf

                      @engikeneer said in

                      You could also use the A and S parameters in your G31 to do repeated probing at different points to improve accuracy.

                      I can't see in the Gcode dictionary the A option in the G31 command. How it works?

                           G31: Set or Report Current Probe status
                           Usage
                      
                           G31 Pnnn Xnnn Ynnn Znnn Cnnn Snnn
                      

                      I'd like to get two/three probes in each probe point having a median to improve the probe accuracy.

                      engikeneerundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • engikeneerundefined
                        engikeneer @Marcossf
                        last edited by

                        @marcossf apologies, its M558 where you specify the A & S parameters for repeated probing... Will update my post

                        https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/M558

                        E3D TC with D3Mini and Toolboards.
                        Home-built CoreXY, Duet Wifi, Chimera direct drive, 2x BMG, 300x300x300 build volume
                        i3 clone with a bunch of mods

                        Marcossfundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • Marcossfundefined
                          Marcossf @engikeneer
                          last edited by

                          @engikeneer Ok, thanks. I'll try M558 A option.

                          Gip_86undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Gip_86undefined
                            Gip_86 @Marcossf
                            last edited by Gip_86

                            so after several days of trying to get good results i have decided to unmount the IR Probe. It make no sense with my FR4 Plate.

                            does Anyone have ga good magnetic plate which will work with the IR sensor??
                            Bed temp could be 90 degree max

                            Thank you

                            o_lampeundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • o_lampeundefined
                              o_lampe @Gip_86
                              last edited by

                              @gip_86 I visited the IR-probe category, because I have made a magnetic flexplate with 1mm pertinax (phenol resin). It came sanded on one side from the vendor and because it's darker and opaque than FR4 it triggers the IR sensor well.
                              I had issues at first, because I powered the probe from 5V. With 3.3V it's much better.
                              Still my heightmaps look horrible, even when I remove the pertinax and probe the magnetic sheet instead.
                              Pertinax
                              height_pertinax.jpg
                              Mag-sheet only (with a glitch!, surface too shiny?)
                              height_magnetOnly.jpg

                              So it's either a not so flat mag-sheet (bought from a site for magnetic car advertising)
                              or the cast aluminum plate is bent...

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA