Wifi 2.1beta6 from 3.5.0-rc.2/3 still disconnecting
-
I learned yesterday that I had a loop in my includes. So the FW opened the same 3 files over and over again, till a counter was reached. It seems to me that this made the WiFi module too disconnect and reconnect without being reachable in the LAN. But it is a guess only. I need observe the behaviour a bit more.
-
@gloomyandy DWC stopped responding no data being updated in the DWC window ,
connection "octo.local"
to get reconnected i use the reload button in chrome
-
@gloomyandy please explain " UART connection to the WiFi board in place."
im connected via USB to hercules , sent the M111 P14 S1 $0D and M111 P1 S1 $0D -
@moth4017 I'm not sure which WiFi module you are using, but on the skrpro there will be a separate set of wires that connects the module UART interface (used for flashing new versions of the WiFi firmware and for debug output) to the main board. That is the connection you need in place to see debug output from the board. If it is working and you run M552 s-1 followed by M522 S1 you should see a lot of debug output from the board.
If a refresh of the web page allows it to work again, I'd say that probably means it it not a problem with the WiFi module, check the Web browser developer console for errors, it may be that DWC has crashed for some reason.
-
@gloomyandy
M111The oldest data was removed. Continue... conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 350 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 349 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 350 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 349 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 350 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 349 bytes Damon running Debugging On Fan & Heater Off 12896 5 New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 350 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 360 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 361 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 337 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 349 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 359 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 360 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 336 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 350 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 349 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 350 bytes Serial port COM3 closed Serial port COM3 opened Serial port COM3 closed Serial port COM3 opened Serial port COM3 closed Serial port COM3 opened Serial port COM3 closed Serial port COM3 opened Serial port COM3 closed Serial port COM3 opened M552 s1 ok New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 349 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 350 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 349 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 350 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 349 bytes M552 s1 ok New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 350 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 349 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 350 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 349 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 350 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 349 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 350 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 349 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 350 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 349 bytes Damon running Debugging On Fan & Heater Off 12917 5 New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 350 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 360 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 361 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 337 bytes New conn on socket 0 for local port 80 Found responder Received 349 bytes M552 s-1 WiFi module stopped ok M552 s1 WiFi: WiFi: ets Jan 8 2013,rst cause:2, boot mode:(3,6) WiFi: WiFi: load 0x4010f000, len 1392, room 16 WiFi: tail 0 WiFi: chksum 0xd0 WiFi: csum 0xd0 WiFi: v00000000 WiFi: ~ld ok WiFi: phy buf[107] is ff adc mode is ff WiFi: boot not set WiFi: ota1 not set WiFi: ota2 not set WiFi: V2 WiFi: Mo WiFi: irf cal sector: 1019 WiFi: freq trace enable 0 WiFi: rf[112]Â WiFi: SDK:3.0.2(824dc80)/Core:unspecified=0/lwIP:STABLE-2_1_2_RELEASE/glue:1.2-17-g354887a/BearSSL:89454af WiFi: SocketServer.cpp(1576): Init completed WiFi: SocketServer.cpp(1577): WiFi: WiFi: DuetWiFiSocketServer version 1.27-04S-D ready WiFi: WiFi module started ESP reported status change ESP reported status change WiFi: SocketServer.cpp(1222): Set hostname to octo WiFi: mode : sta(e8:68:e7:d9:f9:a3) WiFi: add if0 Damon running Debugging On Fan & Heater Off 12927 5 Serial port COM3 closed -
@moth4017 I would have expected to see details of the WiFi server connecting to your access point in that output, did you remove that from what you posted?
But anyway I don't see any signs of a problem with the WiFi module in that output.
-
undefined T3P3Tony moved this topic from Beta Firmware
-
my loop in the config files was not the root unfortunately. The board is again not reachable. It lost the connection approximately 15 minutes after I started a print at a fresh booted printer. I will get an USB extension cable and connect via USB as soon as I have the cable.
I understood that you guys want M122, something else? M11? M552 s-1 followed by M522 S1?
Cheers, Chriss
-
@Chriss I think ideally what we need is...
- Reboot the board
- Connect over USB
- Run M111 P14 S1
- Run m122
- Leave the USB connection open and wait for the WiFi disconnect
- Run M122
- run M552
- run M552 s-1
- run M552 s1
- capture all of the output from the above and post it here.
@droftarts may have other suggestions.
-
Got it, so the current status does not help at all than. But I think that I can reproduce that now.
My local hardware dealer was unable to provide a long enough USB cable. Amazon will bring me one tomorrow noon. Is there anything I need to know for the serial interface? (115200 8n1?)
The only M575 I found is commented out:M575 P1 B115200 S1Cheers, Chriss
-
@Chriss If you haven't restarted the board since you lost the connection and it is still disconnected then running M122 might provide some information.
-
@gloomyandy If you are connecting over USB it is not really a "serial" connection in the normal way of things (so things like the baud rate, stop bits etc. don't really apply).
-
Well, at least the baud rate is needed. I will give it a try with 115200 or the half of it, let's see what I will get out of it.
The docu "https://docs.duet3d.com/en/How_to_guides/Getting_connected/Getting_connected_to_your_Duet" mentions "screen /dev/ttyACM0 115200", so it should be 115200 than.The printer is still printing and I do not want to disturb it now. I will give the M122 a try as soon as the print is finished and I found a laptop to provide the output from that till my long cable arrives out of the Amazon.
Cheers, Chriss
-
@Chriss The baud rate means nothing when connecting via USB to RRF.
-
@Chriss Hello, I'm also looking into this issue. I have a few questions:
-
You mentioned that before 3.5.0rc2 + 2.1beta6, you also observed disconnects but reconnection always succeeded. Do you remember the RRF version and WiFi firmware version you were running then?
-
You mentioned that all Duet boards you have on RRF 3.5rc + WiFi firmware 2.1beta6 have this issue, but the 'others' are fine. Can you tell me what versions these other boards are on?
-
Can you downgrade maybe one of the problematic boards to RRF 3.5.0rc2 + WiFi firmware v1.27?
@moth4017 reports that this issue still occurs for the v1.27 firmware, just want to confirm if that also occurs for you. -
I assume the RRF firmware you flashed on the boards are exactly the release binaries in the GitHub repo. Is this correct?
-
-
@gloomyandy That would be an surprise. I do not think that you can have a serial connection without that both sides use the same speed of the signals. But anyway, a topic for a talk later.
-
@Chriss It isn't a serial connection. It is a direct USB connection that presents itself to Windows as a com port, that's why most of the "normal" serial settings do not apply. Do a search for USB CDC, RRF implements a USB CDC device that basically ignores all of the baud rate and other settings.
-
@rechrtb s
- You mentioned that before 3.5.0rc2 + 2.1beta6, you also observed disconnects but reconnection always succeeded. Do you remember the RRF version and WiFi firmware version you were running then?
I'm not 100% sure, so please do not nail me down to it. But I think that it is 3.5.0RC2 I had before on it. But I saw that behaviour with the reconnects in 3.4 something already. It never bother me because the printer did always reconnect.
And it was only visible via the PanelDue, most of my printers do not have one.- You mentioned that all Duet boards you have on RRF 3.5rc + WiFi firmware 2.1beta6 have this issue, but the 'others' are fine. Can you tell me what versions these other boards are on?
My two other printers and my "on my desk test board" are on 3.4.6. And I have found a other printer which I did not upgraded to RC2, it is still 3.5.0rc2 and this one does not have the problem. And this is very much in use at the moment.
- Can you downgrade maybe one of the problematic boards to RRF 3.5.0rc2 + WiFi firmware v1.27?
Sure, I can do that, but please let Amazon deliver the USB cable first. I want to get the logs from the board in the problematic state. Bring it back into it etc. I will do the downgrade right after that.
- I assume the RRF firmware you flashed on the boards are exactly the release binaries in the GitHub repo. Is this correct?
Yes, all of them are downloaded from the duet githup repo, they are not self compiled.
Just to be clear here about the status and for unblocking my confusion:
1: RC3 with that problem, with PanelDue and printing (My Voron 2.4)
2: RC3 without problem, without PenalDue and not printing (VCast)
3: RC2 without problem, without PenalDue and printing (V0)
4: 3.4.7 without problem, without PenalDue and not printing (Workbench, VCore, Creality)I had to make that clear for me too.. I thought that my V0, which is printing and does not have the problem, is on RC3 already. But it is RC2. The VCast is not fully working at the moment so it is not in use but powered on and does not have the problem.
Cheers, Chriss
-
@gloomyandy I wounder how that works than. What I see on linux is that the board behaves like any other serial device. Like a Arduino, a USB2Serial adapter etc. And what I do is connection with a terminal program like minicom to that port. So the "getty" (to stay here in the linux term) on the other side (on the board) must use the same speed as the terminal does. Both sides can not decode the signals via the serial interface otherwise.
That is at least how I understand serial connections, that is the first time in more than 30 years that I have heard that the baud rated does not matter. Do not get me wrong, I believe you, I'm a bit surprised only and I would like to understand it because that is against 80% of my understanding how serial connections work. (Or the duet board has some magic to detect the baud rate from the terminal and use that speed.)Cheers, Chriss
-
I had a look at my WiFi access point. The AP told me that the "problematic board" is connected, the mac and the IP are correct. My workstation is connected to the AP via wire.
Don't know whether that helps or not, but I think that I should share every observation.Cheers, Chriss
-
@Chriss As I said there is no actual serial port hardware involved in the connection between your linux box and the RRF board. There is a software driver on the linux side that sits on top of the USB endpoint that basically makes the USB connection look like a serial port, the USB system transfers the bytes to the RRF board and on the RRF side there is again software that allow RRF to simply view the data in and out as a simple byte stream. That entire process is defined by the USB CDC standard I mentioned above. This standard does allow for the communication via USB of the baudrate and other settings but in the case of a software only stack as used by RRF this information is not needed and is ignored.
That same standard is used to provide USB to UART devices. These present the same USB interface to your linux system, but they have an actual hardware UART interface that can then talk to other hardware UART devices. Some devices (like the original Arduinos) do not have built in USB hardware so instead they use a USB to UART converter (like the various FTDI chips or the CH340 and CP2102) and this in turn connects via an actual UART serial protocol to the UART built into the Arduino. In this case you do need to ensure that the baud rate and other settings match.
But more advanced micro-controllers like the those used by the Duet boards or many of the the other 32bit chips like the rPi Pico and STM32 chips provide hardware that supports USB directly and in this case the extra complexity (and cost) of the the USB to UART converter is not needed.
