rfm - RepRapFirmware FileManager [duetbackup successor]

Garth_42

@wilriker I am getting the following error when I run the RFM tool. I have attempted on mac and PC, and have tried multiple variants of the command, too. My duet is a Duet3MB6HC in SBC mode running RRF 3.4.5.

Here is a screenshot of the output from terminal:

Best,
Garth

wilriker

@Garth_42 rfm is intended to be used with boards in standalone-mode. AFAIR SBC builds do not support the full HTTP interface for file management plus any SBC has much more powerful means to interact with files than I could ever implement.

wilriker

@Nightowl Sorry for the very late reply. First of all rfm has an extensive help page, accessible via rfm help as well as rfm help <command> to get more details on specific commands.

rfm backup Weeble 0:/ //Libraries/CNC Files/Backups

looks somehow wrong to me. Most likely you missed -device in front of "Weeble". Also beyond that you have further three parameters where rfm only expects two, namely the local path (to write the backup to) and the remote path a.k.a. path on the Duet (specifically in this order). So your command rather likely should look like

rfm backup -device Weeble //Libraries/CNC 0:/

but where would be the best folder to locate rfm?

As you said you put it on your PC (so I assume Windows), to have it most easily working you need to add the directory you store rfm in into your PATH (I haven't used Windows in a decade so please bear with me if I cannot tell you how to do that on recent editions). On Windows there is (or at least was) no standard way of puting custom binaries anywhere so again this is left to you where to actually put the binary (sorry).

I'm assuming all the folders should be backed up, but does rfm process them all

rfm will simply backup everything recursively under the given remote path. In your case 0:/ will simply back yup every single file it can find on the SD card.

Is there a naming protocol for the backup files, or will they be overwritten every time they're backed up?

They will be overwritten continuously with each run. It will leave remotely removed files locally though unless you also pass the parameter -removeLocal.

Nightowl

Awesome, thank you @wilriker

You are completely forgiven.

The backup folder will actually be on a NAS (hopefully), but you've given me plenty to get on with.

Thanks again

Garth_42

@wilriker haha, thanks for the reply. This is good to know, I was creating an rclone script to do backup on the SBC. I saw this and my interest was piqued.

Nightowl

@wilriker
Sorry to have to keep asking silly questions, but i've tried to run RFM from the folder it's installed in, from the command line in Windows, and I get the error:

-domain is mandatory

I've used both the IP address and domain name of the control board, i.e.:

rfm backup -device Weeble //Libraries/CNC File O:/

and

rfm backup -device 192.168.1.121 //Libraries/CNC File O:/

With the same result.

Have I missed something (else!) please?

Thank you

wilriker

@Nightowl rfm uses two sources to get the parameters to connect to a device. For convenience means it will save connection settings (-domain as well as -port and -password) in a config file. By default it uses a device called default for that.

You have to provide this information (only -domain is actually necessary, the other two can use the default value in 99% of the times) once and after that you can omit these because they are saved in the config file. So you need to call

rfm backup -domain <network address of your duet> -device Weeble ...

once to init the config file. After that you can omit -domain ... and just use -device Weeble - or unless you want to address multiple devices you can also omit the -device Weeble part and from the start and use the default device.

After that it should work.

k3lag

I just discovered rfm, nice job.

I am using it on a Mac running Ventura. I am finding that it won't resolve the host name of my railcore.

If I use the IP address it works fine but if I use the name railcore.local it doesn't find it. railcore.local does work for a ping from the command line and from a browser.

wilriker

I just released rmf v1.2.0 yesterday.

It contains a bug fix for the backup command when the amount of files in a directory on the SD card exceed the amount that can be returned by RRF in one single response - rfm used to go into an endless loop then.

Besides that it was not possible to abort any operation by sending an interrupt signal (pressing CTRL+C on the console). I recommend everyone to update to the latest version.

Chriss

Hi @wilriker, thank you very much for that tool! I use it 3-4 times a day!

I have a tiny feature request. I would like to have one more switch:

--version | -v

That would be very helpful.

Cheers, Chriss

Triet

I am "necroposting" but this is supposed to be the place to put this question. rfm is still a thing, or not?

rfm is intended to be used to copy/backup files on the SD card.

Would it be possible to configure some File Transfer client software to use rfm as the underlying transfer method? Usually, those clients use some sort of FTP to do that. Of course, it is up to the client software to be so flexible to allow free customization of operations to get/put files, defining which external tool would be used and their options.

Has anyone done that? This is to avoid using FTP (wobbly in my case).

By the way, what is the network protocol used by rfm?

wilriker

@Triet said in rfm - RepRapFirmware FileManager [duetbackup successor]:

By the way, what is the network protocol used by rfm?

rfm uses HTTP as the underlying communication protocol.