Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Thank for the massive update about PID TUNING !!!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    13
    35
    2.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • OwenDundefined
      OwenD @deckingman
      last edited by OwenD

      @deckingman
      Yes, you need to add B1. Edit: It's B0 for PID on the bed
      The hint at the end of tuning doesn't show it, but M500 does.
      Also if you're using a mains powered bed you need the change the V24/12 to V0
      I just copied the hint the first time and couldn't figure out why I was getting such erratic temps after tuning. Without B1 it will default to bang-bang.

      I did report this, so I presume the hint will get updated at some time.

      garyd9undefined deckingmanundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • garyd9undefined
        garyd9 @OwenD
        last edited by

        @OwenD said in Thank for the massive update about PID TUNING !!!:

        Also if you're using a mains powered bed you need the change the V24/12 to V0

        I never realized that before. I assume that applies when the bed is powered by AC mains, but controlled by a SSR attached to the duet as well.

        Quite a few people are probably running AC powered silicone heaters via a SSR with V23.8 or something like that as a parameter to the respective M307 command.

        "I'm not saying that you are wrong - I'm just trying to fit it into my real world simulated experience."

        Nuramoriundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Nuramoriundefined
          Nuramori @garyd9
          last edited by

          @garyd9

          This is new news. When I run an auto tune, the report says to set v to v23.x. I run an ac mains heater bed. Am I reading this correctly that if I’m running ac mains for my bed heater I should ignore the v value and set it to zero?

          garyd9undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • garyd9undefined
            garyd9 @Nuramori
            last edited by garyd9

            @Nuramori said in Thank for the massive update about PID TUNING !!!:

            @garyd9

            This is new news. When I run an auto tune, the report says to set v to v23.x. I run an ac mains heater bed. Am I reading this correctly that if I’m running ac mains for my bed heater I should ignore the v value and set it to zero?

            That's what it looks like, and it's also stated on the duet gcode wiki page (though I never noticed it before) here: https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Gcode#Section_M307_Set_or_report_heating_process_parameters

            Check the description of the "V" parameter: "A value of zero disables compensation for changes in supply voltage. Use V0 for AC mains powered heaters." -- that would make sense for something powered on AC mains. No need to send more power to a SSR if the duet measured DC voltage drops.

            "I'm not saying that you are wrong - I'm just trying to fit it into my real world simulated experience."

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • deckingmanundefined
              deckingman @OwenD
              last edited by

              @OwenD said in Thank for the massive update about PID TUNING !!!:

              @deckingman
              Yes, you need to add B1. Edit: It's B0 for PID on the bed
              The hint at the end of tuning doesn't show it, but M500 does.
              Also if you're using a mains powered bed you need the change the V24/12 to V0
              I just copied the hint the first time and couldn't figure out why I was getting such erratic temps after tuning. Without B1 it will default to bang-bang.

              I did report this, so I presume the hint will get updated at some time.

              On the basis that I've always added the B0 parameter, I've continued to add it after tuning. A moderator thinks it might not be necessary but says he'll confirm.

              I know the "hint" doesn't show - I am the one who pointed that out.

              Thanks for pointing out the "V0" thing. That is a very recent change to the documentation. A few days ago (when I tuned my bed heater) , it said something along the lines of omitting the "V" parameter for mains powered heaters - no mention at that time of making it V0.

              I wish they would add things like this to the release notes, rather than sneaking them into the documentation some time later, after we've studiously read the release notes and implemented any required changes to our configuration files. Looks like I'll have to go back through my configurations yet again, and make further changes........

              Ian
              https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
              https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

              OwenDundefined dc42undefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • OwenDundefined
                OwenD @deckingman
                last edited by

                @deckingman
                It's self evident that you know the hint doesn't give the B0 setting. Otherwise you wouldn't have added it after all.
                You asked if it was necessary and I indicated it is because without it my printer defaulted to bang-bang and gave rise to large oscillations in bed temp.
                https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/19761/new-heater-tuning-algorithm/111

                deckingmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • deckingmanundefined
                  deckingman @OwenD
                  last edited by

                  @OwenD said in Thank for the massive update about PID TUNING !!!:

                  @deckingman
                  It's self evident that you know the hint doesn't give the B0 setting. Otherwise you wouldn't have added it after all.
                  You asked if it was necessary and I indicated it is because without it my printer defaulted to bang-bang and gave rise to large oscillations in bed temp.
                  https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/19761/new-heater-tuning-algorithm/111

                  Ahh. I misunderstood what you were trying to say which is basically that, yes the B0 parameter is still necessary and should still be added. Furthermore, the "hint" showing the M307 is incorrect because it does not include the B0 parameter. This needs to be corrected IMO.

                  Ian
                  https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                  https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • dc42undefined
                    dc42 administrators @deckingman
                    last edited by

                    @deckingman said in Thank for the massive update about PID TUNING !!!:

                    @OwenD said in Thank for the massive update about PID TUNING !!!:

                    @deckingman
                    Yes, you need to add B1. Edit: It's B0 for PID on the bed
                    The hint at the end of tuning doesn't show it, but M500 does.
                    Also if you're using a mains powered bed you need the change the V24/12 to V0
                    I just copied the hint the first time and couldn't figure out why I was getting such erratic temps after tuning. Without B1 it will default to bang-bang.

                    I did report this, so I presume the hint will get updated at some time.

                    On the basis that I've always added the B0 parameter, I've continued to add it after tuning. A moderator thinks it might not be necessary but says he'll confirm.

                    I know the "hint" doesn't show - I am the one who pointed that out.

                    Thanks for pointing out the "V0" thing. That is a very recent change to the documentation. A few days ago (when I tuned my bed heater) , it said something along the lines of omitting the "V" parameter for mains powered heaters - no mention at that time of making it V0.

                    I wish they would add things like this to the release notes, rather than sneaking them into the documentation some time later, after we've studiously read the release notes and implemented any required changes to our configuration files. Looks like I'll have to go back through my configurations yet again, and make further changes........

                    Omitting the V parameter has the same effect as using V0.

                    Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                    Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                    http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                    deckingmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • deckingmanundefined
                      deckingman @dc42
                      last edited by

                      @dc42 said in Thank for the massive update about PID TUNING !!!:

                      Omitting the V parameter has the same effect as using V0.

                      Thanks for the clarification. It might be an idea if that was added to the documentation too.

                      Ian
                      https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                      https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                      Phaedruxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Phaedruxundefined
                        Phaedrux Moderator @deckingman
                        last edited by

                        @deckingman Done

                        Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                        deckingmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • deckingmanundefined
                          deckingman @Phaedrux
                          last edited by

                          @Phaedrux said in Thank for the massive update about PID TUNING !!!:

                          @deckingman Done

                          I meant add DC's comment that omitting the "V" parameter has the same effect as using V0. Or maybe you have elsewhere but not here https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Gcode#Section_M307_Set_or_report_heating_process_parameters

                          Ian
                          https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                          https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                          Phaedruxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Phaedruxundefined
                            Phaedrux Moderator @deckingman
                            last edited by

                            @deckingman Refresh the page perhaps?

                            Vnnn VIN supply voltage at which the A parameter was calibrated (RepRapFirmware 1.20 and later). This allows the PID controller to compensate for changes in supply voltage. A value of zero disables compensation for changes in supply voltage. Use V0 for AC mains powered heaters. (V0 is the default. Leaving off V is the same as V0)

                            Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • MartinNYHCundefined
                              MartinNYHC
                              last edited by MartinNYHC

                              M303
                              
                              Annn (RRF 3.2beta3.2 and later, optional) ambient temperature - 
                              use this parameter if you want to tune a heater that has been on 
                              and has not cooled down to embient temperature yet
                              
                              M303 H0 S230 A40
                              Error: M303: heater 0 target temperature must be below the temperature limit for this heater (120.0C)
                              

                              Did is misunderstand something?

                              Phaedruxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Phaedruxundefined
                                Phaedrux Moderator @MartinNYHC
                                last edited by

                                @MartinNYHC said in Thank for the massive update about PID TUNING !!!:

                                M303 H0 S230 A40 Error: M303: heater 0 target temperature must be below the temperature limit for this heater (120.0C)
                                Did is misunderstand something?

                                Yes. You're trying to tune the bed heater to 230c, which is above the max temp limit you've set at 120c.

                                Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                                MartinNYHCundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • MartinNYHCundefined
                                  MartinNYHC @Phaedrux
                                  last edited by

                                  @Phaedrux said in Thank for the massive update about PID TUNING !!!:

                                  @MartinNYHC said in Thank for the massive update about PID TUNING !!!:

                                  M303 H0 S230 A40 Error: M303: heater 0 target temperature must be below the temperature limit for this heater (120.0C)
                                  Did is misunderstand something?

                                  Yes. You're trying to tune the bed heater to 230c, which is above the max temp limit you've set at 120c.

                                  Aaaargh. It has to be H1. That's the second time today I totally messed up. Not my day 🤒

                                  Vetiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Vetiundefined
                                    Veti @MartinNYHC
                                    last edited by

                                    @MartinNYHC said in Thank for the massive update about PID TUNING !!!:

                                    H1

                                    better use T0, if you want tuning with the fan.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • Muggaundefined
                                      Mugga
                                      last edited by

                                      I've just updated to version 3.2 coming from 3.1.1 and also did the new PID tuning, using the tool as "heater" M303 T0 S240. Everything went okay so far, but the results arent that good.
                                      This was the first print I did, it really took some time to get stable temps (there is a 5 degree drop after the first layer via slicer):
                                      hotend_temps.PNG

                                      In another print I've got a heater error and a quite spicky graph, forgot to make a screenshoot of it. Cleared the heater fault afterwards and restarted print, which went fine.

                                      This way my old PID tune with RRF 3.1.1:

                                      M307 H1 A735.3 C254.6 D5.2 S1.00 V24.2 B0 
                                      

                                      And new with 3.2

                                      M307 H1 R2.576 C273.2:173.4 D5.89 S1.00 V24.3
                                      

                                      Any ideas what could be the issue?

                                      Blacksheep99undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • dc42undefined
                                        dc42 administrators
                                        last edited by

                                        If you have a spiky temperature graph, that indicates a temperature measuring issue.

                                        It's hard to tell much from that graph without seeing more detail, however there is evidently some overshoot at the start. The old gain (A) parameter was 735.3 whereas the new one is 2.576 * 273.2 = 704. The reduction probably explains the overshoot. Try increasing the R parameter by a factor of 735.3/704 to get rid of it.

                                        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Muggaundefined
                                          Mugga
                                          last edited by

                                          Thx for the explanation. I will adjust the R parameter like you said and see if that helps with the overshoot.
                                          I will have a closer look at the spiky temperature at the heatup phase, maybe it was just a hickup.

                                          Cableing should be okay, I just rebuild the printer and redid the wiring with new cables and crimps. Could any config related stuff interfere with the temperature readings?

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Blacksheep99undefined
                                            Blacksheep99 @Mugga
                                            last edited by

                                            @Mugga said in Thank for the massive update about PID TUNING !!!:

                                            I've just updated to version 3.2 coming from 3.1.1 and also did the new PID tuning, using the tool as "heater" M303 T0 S240. Everything went okay so far, but the results arent that good.
                                            This was the first print I did, it really took some time to get stable temps (there is a 5 degree drop after the first layer via slicer):
                                            hotend_temps.PNG

                                            In another print I've got a heater error and a quite spicky graph, forgot to make a screenshoot of it. Cleared the heater fault afterwards and restarted print, which went fine.

                                            This way my old PID tune with RRF 3.1.1:

                                            M307 H1 A735.3 C254.6 D5.2 S1.00 V24.2 B0 
                                            

                                            And new with 3.2

                                            M307 H1 R2.576 C273.2:173.4 D5.89 S1.00 V24.3
                                            

                                            Any ideas what could be the issue?

                                            Sorry to go off topic but how do you name your heaters like that?

                                            Phaedruxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA