@T3P3Tony Here's a PDF I made that should help with what the "I" value should be for the toolboard, based on how it's oriented. Hope it helps.

Toolboard accelerometer orientation guide

@dc42 any chance that a future version of the toolboard could/would have the accelerometer baked into it, or an expansion header to work with say the adafruit board?

@JayJay said in PT100 with a Duet-3-6HC & Tool-Board-LC1 ?:

@Veti said in PT100 with a Duet-3-6HC & Tool-Board-LC1 ?:

i would suggest getting a pt1000 sensor

Thats not happening, if the supposed best control board cant accept an analog input from a P100 amplifier thats a pretty poor show.

I would rather rip out the Duet-3 , install the 32bit GTR PRO V1.0 and run Klipper/Octoprint with the dwc2-for-klipper-socket, a board I know is going to accept an analog signal.

The way you've responded comes off more as a troll than someone with an actual issue. So I'm clear, you're asking (demanding) that the TOOLBOARD support a PT100 sensor, but if it can't and won't, you're going to rip it out, buy new hardware, and HAVE to route wires from the head to the main board anyway, something that was a plausible solution with using the Duet3. You then say you're not willing to use a PT1000 because you'd have to buy additional hardware, and wait for it's delivery, so instead, that too is why you'd rip out a Duet3 and buy (and wait) for an entire new controller and hardware. Because why spend more money when you have parts.

I wanted to make sure I understand this logic.

One thing I did was collect all the old and torn silicone socks I had lying around and made a wipe.

I just sliced off the sides and kept the face, then alternated them with washers. Used RTV on the bottom to bind them.

The one thing that I used quite often and rely on for several reasons was the gviewer in octoprint. I have seen the fork of the viewer that has been done by someone who's name I can't remember at the moment, but it's not the same tool as in octoprint. It may seem to get relegated as a nonsense or convenience tool at times on the forum here, but the combination of slider to view future layer pathing, and also (near) real time indication of what the print head is doing and intended to do has saved my prints and lowered my blood pressure more often than not. Even if a DWC plugin that would mimic that as close as possible would be fantastic - the code is open, and iirc in python. If there's a plug-in API, I would even try and migrate that somehow. Personally I'd love to see it as part of DWC.

@MartinNYHC

I have mine working on my BLV with the duet3. It’s actually easier than it was with the duet2. I can share details and pictures in a bit if you’re interested.

I’m excited to see development in non-planar technology, especially for my industry (architecture/design).

Here you go.

From Adafruit

@damaged_goods I’m in the US, and have my “old” duet2 and duex5 that I swapped out for a duet3. It’s in perfect condition and was used for only about 4-6 months. I upgraded to the duet3 so I had less complexity with the one board vs needing two.

It’s a genuine board, and was purchased from filastruder (I’m 20 minutes from them). Let me know if you’re interested. I have it lying around, thinking I’d use it to upgrade an old printer, but it’s just collecting dust.

This is the only thing I was missing from octoprint. Having the gcode viewer would close the door on my need for it. .

@dc42 as soon as I replaced my thermistor with a pt1000 I haven’t had one since. Before I would get one with almost every print.

@gnydick

Yep. That’s how I always had it set up. I didn’t realize that’s what was written down differed from that, because I just did what was logical

@damaged_goods no worries.

The duet3 rocks. You won’t be disappointed, especially since it sounds like you were using a similar controller setup to what I had in place.

@damaged_goods I’m in the US, and have my “old” duet2 and duex5 that I swapped out for a duet3. It’s in perfect condition and was used for only about 4-6 months. I upgraded to the duet3 so I had less complexity with the one board vs needing two.

It’s a genuine board, and was purchased from filastruder (I’m 20 minutes from them). Let me know if you’re interested. I have it lying around, thinking I’d use it to upgrade an old printer, but it’s just collecting dust.

@rjenkinsgb Yep, all good. I had previously been feeding it off of the duet3, but I suspect some random mid print stalls are/were related to under voltage to the pi4, and wanted to finally clear some to-do's off my list.

all reconfigured and working as intended. thanks.

@zapta I'm using the duet3 6hc, v1.0

@rjenkinsgb can you share your jumper settings? Are you supplying the 5v via the three pin that also has the pson pin as part of the array?

I have two meanwell PSUs on my printer, one that supplies 5v/12v primarily for the SBC, and a 24v that also has the ability to remotely turn on using the pson function on my duet3. Since the 24v powers the duet3, am I to assume that once I turn off the 24v psu via a M81 command, the fact the SBC can still operate doesn’t matter, and I can’t issue a M80 to turn it back on until I power cycle the entire machine? Perhaps there’s still some functionality that allows some pass through so that issuing a M80 will trigger that pin even with the duet3 not receiving power from the 24v supply?
@dc42?

@peirof

If you have a config-override file it may be negating your config changes.

@resam oooohhhhhhhhhh......

Your example is almost a perfect base for a project I've been trying to do as a plug-in! Would you be willing to assist? It would be a very minor modification, basically allowing for TWO load cells to be polled, with the results being displayed.

What I've built, but not quite coded into a final form, is a belt tension calibrator for an XY cube, that measures the force the belt applies to a loadcell (one per belt), to allow for equalizing the tension on both sides. It's fully built, and I have test code to validate the project, but I was looking for a way to make it a full plug-in. You project is essentially one half of what I was looking to do.