Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    stepper precision

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    3D Printing General Chat
    6
    110
    5.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • arhiundefined
      arhi @alankilian
      last edited by

      @alankilian 360/65535 degrees

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • alankilianundefined
        alankilian
        last edited by

        Well, all I can say is you are getting results that do not match with my experience in such situations.

        Being able to rotate 180-degrees and repeatable read within 0.005-degree is some kind of black magic indeed. You are a master.

        SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

        arhiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • arhiundefined
          arhi @alankilian
          last edited by

          @alankilian said in stepper precision:

          Well, all I can say is you are getting results that do not match with my experience in such situations.

          Being able to rotate 180-degrees and repeatable read within 0.005-degree is some kind of black magic indeed. You are a master.

          😄 we'll see how it goes on the "bigger sample" I just let it go 400 steps forwards and 400 steps backwards and store all the data and spit out differences... would be much easier if I knew python (darn thing don't even have proper arrays) ... as for 180degrees back forth that one I did not test ... I just let it run 3200 steps forward and 3200 steps backwards and compared two greps ... let's see how the aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa sh%$#%^# forgot to pipe it into file 😞 .. need to run it again ... brb

          mendenmhundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • mendenmhundefined
            mendenmh @arhi
            last edited by mendenmh

            @arhi As to your comment about array in python: the numpy package is the default scientific array package. It is a lot like matlab. It is extraordinarily powerful. The python 'array' class, and python's own lists and tuples, are for entirely different purposes than handling what you want.

            arhiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • arhiundefined
              arhi @mendenmh
              last edited by arhi

              @mendenmh I don't plan to learn python and it's libraries today (I hope never), dunno why it was invented and how the hack it gained popularity but... I'll make it work somehow to get this done.... anyone want to send some code for me to run I'll be happy to 😄 .. my example that's attached is enough for anyone to know how to read the data from encoder and move the motor, so I'll run the code provided and report back results 😄 if anyone is interested ...

              attm waiting for this to finish:

              #!/usr/bin/env python3
              
              import pyprofibus
              import time
              import RPi.GPIO as GPIO
              
              def main(watchdog=None):
                      master = None
                      forwarddata = []
                      backwardsdata = []
              
                      #poserem se na jezik
                      for i in range(410):
                              forwarddata.append(0);
                              backwardsdata.append(0);
              
              
                      try:
                              config = pyprofibus.PbConf.fromFile("arhi_readencoder.conf")
                              master = config.makeDPM()
                              outData = {}
                              for slaveConf in config.slaveConfs:
                                      slaveDesc = slaveConf.makeDpSlaveDesc()
                                      master.addSlave(slaveDesc)
                                      outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr] = bytearray((0x00, ))
              
                              master.initialize()
              
                              GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BCM)
                              GPIO.setup(12, GPIO.OUT)
                              GPIO.setup(13, GPIO.OUT)
                              GPIO.output(12, GPIO.LOW)
                              GPIO.output(13, GPIO.LOW)
                              totalsteps = 0
                              for i in range(400):
                                      done = False
                                      counter = 0
                                      average = 0
                                      while not done:
                                              outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr] = bytearray((0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00, ))
                                              for slaveDesc in master.getSlaveList():
                                                      slaveDesc.setOutData(outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr])
              
                                              handledSlaveDesc = master.run()
              
                                              if handledSlaveDesc:
                                                      inData = handledSlaveDesc.getInData()
                                                      if inData is not None:
                                                              print(inData[3] + inData[2]*256)
                                                              average = average + inData[3] + inData[2]*256
                                                              counter = counter + 1
                                                              if (counter > 9):
                                                                      done = True
                                                                      average = average / 10
              
                                              if watchdog is not None:
                                                      watchdog()
              
                                      print("AVERAGE: ", totalsteps, ", ", average,  flush=True)
                                      forwarddata[totalsteps] = average;
              
                                      # now do a step
                                      GPIO.output(12, GPIO.HIGH)
                                      time.sleep(0.0001)
                                      GPIO.output(12, GPIO.LOW)
                                      time.sleep(1)
                                      totalsteps = totalsteps + 1
              
                              GPIO.output(13, GPIO.HIGH)
                              for i in range(400):
                                      done = False
                                      counter = 0
                                      average = 0
                                      while not done:
                                              outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr] = bytearray((0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00, ))
                                              for slaveDesc in master.getSlaveList():
                                                      slaveDesc.setOutData(outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr])
              
                                              handledSlaveDesc = master.run()
              
                                              if handledSlaveDesc:
                                                      inData = handledSlaveDesc.getInData()
                                                      if inData is not None:
                                                              print(inData[3] + inData[2]*256)
                                                              average = average + inData[3] + inData[2]*256
                                                              counter = counter + 1
                                                              if (counter > 9):
                                                                      done = True
                                                                      average = average / 10
              
                                              if watchdog is not None:
                                                      watchdog()
              
                                      print("AVERAGE: ", totalsteps, ", ", average,  flush=True)
                                      backwardsdata[totalsteps] = average;
              
                                      # now do a step
                                      GPIO.output(12, GPIO.HIGH)
                                      time.sleep(0.0001)
                                      GPIO.output(12, GPIO.LOW)
                                      time.sleep(1)
                                      totalsteps = totalsteps - 1
              
                              for i in range( len(backwardsdata) ):
                                      print(i, forwarddata[i], backwardsdata[i], forwarddata[i] - backwardsdata[i])
              
                      except pyprofibus.ProfibusError as e:
                              print("Terminating: %s" % str(e))
                              return 1
                      finally:
                              GPIO.cleanup()
                              if master:
                                      master.destroy()
                      return 0
              
              if __name__ == "__main__":
                      import sys
                      sys.exit(main())
              
              
              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • alankilianundefined
                alankilian
                last edited by

                I'm having a little trouble analyzing your data.

                It looks like you are taking 3201 samples every revolution when I look at the .zip file you uploaded.

                I didn't take a look at the Python code since I'm also not a Python expert.

                Take a look at when your encoder flips over to it's minimum count and see that there seem to be ( to my eyes) 3201 samples between them.

                That makes it a little difficult to analyze.

                I'll take a look at your next data set after you upload it.

                SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

                arhiundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • arhiundefined
                  arhi @alankilian
                  last edited by

                  @alankilian going forward then backward and recording all steps was awesome suggestion ... data is ugly 😞

                  33eb1e94-1b20-4446-a164-5e4df9cb1816-image.png

                  Untitled 1.ods

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • arhiundefined
                    arhi @alankilian
                    last edited by arhi

                    @alankilian

                    It looks like you are taking 3201 samples every revolution when I look at the .zip file you uploaded.

                    the "multiturn" file is stepping for a while (whole night) going forward. encoder goes up to 65535 and then to 0 (it is absolute encoder) so it allow multiturn but records only positions inside one revolution

                    the "single turn" have 2 reasons to figure out it's full turn, one is to read the "similar" (20 less difference) position from the first one it reads when it start, and second reason is if it makes 400*32 steps (I assume 1/32 microstepping .9 degree motor ) .. first run it made 3199 steps in second 3200 steps. Motor is 1.8 degree and microstepping is 1/16 so 3200 steps is ok.

                    Now, you see "more" data, that's cause I do: Step, read encoder 10 times (output all 10), calc average of those 10 and display average value (add them all together and divide by 10). So for every step there is 11 rows in the txt file...

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • arhiundefined
                      arhi
                      last edited by

                      error goes from 60 to 80 or 0.33° to 0.44°

                      the span is 400 microsteps or 25 full steps so I'm assuming the full step positions are where the error is .33° and between steps the error goes up to .44°. I expected to see 50 peaks and not 25 as I expected that "half step" is nearly as precise as full step (as number of ppl and documents online state)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • arhiundefined
                        arhi
                        last edited by

                        I'll use a stiff coupler now to see if that would make a difference...

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • arhiundefined
                          arhi
                          last edited by

                          raw data (the xls is few posts back)

                          backforth.txt

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • arhiundefined
                            arhi
                            last edited by arhi

                            S42B - same motor, open-loop mode, here we can see, I think the half stepping too...

                            4c8b1d4a-d471-4a5e-b507-e516ed51f8f5-image.png
                            s42b-openloop-back-forth.txt

                            alankilianundefined arhiundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • alankilianundefined
                              alankilian @arhi
                              last edited by

                              @arhi Can you post your Python code for this?

                              I suspect there's an "off-by-one" somewhere and you're getting better results than you see in your graph.

                              I'm probably wrong, but if so, you might be happy.

                              SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

                              arhiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • arhiundefined
                                arhi @arhi
                                last edited by

                                This post is deleted!
                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • arhiundefined
                                  arhi @alankilian
                                  last edited by arhi

                                  @alankilian said in stepper precision:

                                  @arhi Can you post your Python code for this?

                                  I suspect there's an "off-by-one" somewhere and you're getting better results than you see in your graph.

                                  I'm probably wrong, but if so, you might be happy.

                                  I hoped but it's not 😞 anyhow .. here it is:

                                  #!/usr/bin/env python3
                                  
                                  import pyprofibus
                                  import time
                                  import RPi.GPIO as GPIO
                                  
                                  def main(watchdog=None):
                                          master = None
                                          forwarddata = []
                                          backwardsdata = []
                                  
                                          #poserem se na jezik
                                          for i in range(410):
                                                  forwarddata.append(0);
                                                  backwardsdata.append(0);
                                  
                                  
                                          try:
                                                  config = pyprofibus.PbConf.fromFile("arhi_readencoder.conf")
                                                  master = config.makeDPM()
                                                  outData = {}
                                                  for slaveConf in config.slaveConfs:
                                                          slaveDesc = slaveConf.makeDpSlaveDesc()
                                                          master.addSlave(slaveDesc)
                                                          outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr] = bytearray((0x00, ))
                                  
                                                  master.initialize()
                                  
                                                  GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BCM)
                                                  GPIO.setup(12, GPIO.OUT)
                                                  GPIO.setup(13, GPIO.OUT)
                                                  GPIO.output(12, GPIO.LOW)
                                                  GPIO.output(13, GPIO.LOW)
                                                  totalsteps = 0
                                                  for i in range(400):
                                                          done = False
                                                          counter = 0
                                                          average = 0
                                                          while not done:
                                                                  outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr] = bytearray((0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00, ))
                                                                  for slaveDesc in master.getSlaveList():
                                                                          slaveDesc.setOutData(outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr])
                                  
                                                                  handledSlaveDesc = master.run()
                                  
                                                                  if handledSlaveDesc:
                                                                          inData = handledSlaveDesc.getInData()
                                                                          if inData is not None:
                                                                                  print(inData[3] + inData[2]*256)
                                                                                  average = average + inData[3] + inData[2]*256
                                                                                  counter = counter + 1
                                                                                  if (counter > 9):
                                                                                          done = True
                                                                                          average = average / 10
                                  
                                                                  if watchdog is not None:
                                                                          watchdog()
                                  
                                                          print("AVERAGE: ", totalsteps, ", ", average,  flush=True)
                                                          forwarddata[totalsteps] = average;
                                  
                                                          # now do a step
                                                          GPIO.output(12, GPIO.HIGH)
                                                          time.sleep(0.0001)
                                                          GPIO.output(12, GPIO.LOW)
                                                          time.sleep(1)
                                                          totalsteps = totalsteps + 1
                                  
                                                  GPIO.output(13, GPIO.HIGH)
                                                  for i in range(400):
                                                          done = False
                                                          counter = 0
                                                          average = 0
                                                          while not done:
                                                                  outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr] = bytearray((0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00, ))
                                                                  for slaveDesc in master.getSlaveList():
                                                                          slaveDesc.setOutData(outData[slaveDesc.slaveAddr])
                                  
                                                                  handledSlaveDesc = master.run()
                                  
                                                                  if handledSlaveDesc:
                                                                          inData = handledSlaveDesc.getInData()
                                                                          if inData is not None:
                                                                                  print(inData[3] + inData[2]*256)
                                                                                  average = average + inData[3] + inData[2]*256
                                                                                  counter = counter + 1
                                                                                  if (counter > 9):
                                                                                          done = True
                                                                                          average = average / 10
                                  
                                                                  if watchdog is not None:
                                                                          watchdog()
                                  
                                                          print("AVERAGE: ", totalsteps, ", ", average,  flush=True)
                                                          backwardsdata[totalsteps] = average;
                                  
                                                          # now do a step
                                                          GPIO.output(12, GPIO.HIGH)
                                                          time.sleep(0.0001)
                                                          GPIO.output(12, GPIO.LOW)
                                                          time.sleep(1)
                                                          totalsteps = totalsteps - 1
                                  
                                                  for i in range( len(backwardsdata) ):
                                                          print(i, forwarddata[i], backwardsdata[i], forwarddata[i] - backwardsdata[i])
                                  
                                          except pyprofibus.ProfibusError as e:
                                                  print("Terminating: %s" % str(e))
                                                  return 1
                                          finally:
                                                  GPIO.cleanup()
                                                  if master:
                                                          master.destroy()
                                          return 0
                                  
                                  if __name__ == "__main__":
                                          import sys
                                          sys.exit(main())
                                  

                                  The "off by one" is imho "not a problem" as if you look at the printout ..

                                  0 20828.0 0 20828.0
                                  1 20835.0 20869.0 -34.0
                                  2 20840.0 20876.0 -36.0
                                  ...
                                  398 23964.0 23972.0 -8.0
                                  399 23972.0 23976.0 -4.0
                                  400 0 23979.0 -23979.0
                                  

                                  you see that firs read is 20828.0, 0 - so going backwards I did not read backwards at all, and last read is 0, 23979.0 so going forward I didn't read that one ...

                                  also you see the "end" going forward it goes up (last dataset, for the TMC driver it's reversed)

                                  23964.0
                                  23972.0

                                  then first read backwards (actually it was not stepped backwards yet that's position after last step forward)
                                  23979.0 so larger than 23972

                                  and then it goes down again
                                  23976.0
                                  23972.0

                                  also, if you look how error is down to nothing when you just turn direction and how it rises... takes some 20+ steps in reverse for error to catch up the average values..

                                  First step back the error is 0.02 degrees

                                  alankilianundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • arhiundefined
                                    arhi
                                    last edited by arhi

                                    I managed to get S42B v1.0 to work (no clue how any more), now it's running in closedloop mode too so waiting for results... interesting - I have no clue what microstepping it is running at, lcd configured 1/32 but what it is actually doing - no clue, will run the original one direction full circle after this back-forth finish

                                    need to find my vallder (leadshine clone) .. dunno where I put the darn thing in this chaos

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • arhiundefined
                                      arhi
                                      last edited by arhi

                                      S42B V1.0 - in closed loop mode def does not work ok .. having ton of issues with it, was not working at all, now it moves but .. the worse part is it's not even showing that there is an error here 😞 .. other ppl also report issues with it so won't waste more time on it 😞 ..

                                      eaeacdc8-460c-424c-b13b-d6fbe57fe014-image.png

                                      s42b-closedloop-back-forth.txt

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • alankilianundefined
                                        alankilian @arhi
                                        last edited by

                                        @arhi said in stepper precision:

                                        if you look how error is down to nothing when you just turn direction and how it rises... takes some 20+ steps in reverse for error to catch up the average values..

                                        If I'm understanding you correctly, that's probably the flexibility in your tape/ziptie connection causing "backlash"

                                        When I move datapoints around to fake-eliminate that backlash (if that's what it is) I get a very nice chart of error values.

                                        Untitled.png

                                        SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

                                        arhiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • arhiundefined
                                          arhi @alankilian
                                          last edited by

                                          @alankilian said in stepper precision:

                                          If I'm understanding you correctly, that's probably the flexibility in your tape/ziptie connection causing "backlash"

                                          very possible. I tested 10 steps back/forth and was getting values 0-2 for error so assumed that's it but looks like it's not holding water... darn encoder have shaft larger than nema17 and smaller than 8mm so none of my couplers fit.. ordered some new but..

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • arhiundefined
                                            arhi
                                            last edited by arhi

                                            S42B, closed loop mode - changed menu to 1/16 (from 1/32) and let it calibrate again

                                            0bf952ee-09b7-404f-bfca-f8656f5306f0-image.png

                                            s42b-closedloop-back-forth-go2.txt

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA