Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    What firmware version are you using?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    31
    47
    3.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • NeoDueundefined
      NeoDue @GeneRisi
      last edited by

      @generisi I can confirm that it runs perfectly fine and fast as well.

      I had the "Operation 3 failed" Wifi problem (https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/21562/firmware-bundle-3-2-2-released/) when upgrading from 3.2.0 to 3.2.2 though.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • RyanPundefined
        RyanP
        last edited by

        2.05 on all machines. Too much on my plate. But one day I will simply do all machines.

        CR10S, August 2018
        Anycubic Photon S December 2019
        Ender 5 Feb 2020
        Ender 5 Plus May 2020
        Anycubic Photon Mono X Nov 2020
        ~
        https://3dimensiongames.com/

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • EducatingSavvasundefined
          EducatingSavvas @Phaedrux
          last edited by EducatingSavvas

          @phaedrux I tried the latest beta version but found the addition of a P parameter to define a spindle tool in the M3 command problematic - so went back to 3.2. I got it working but suspect using/gearing up for multiple tools (tang knife, laser, plotting-pen and spindle) will be over complicated by this. Possibly having to to use separate post processors for each tool, instead of using the tool number in the tool database to determine the tool I am using.

          dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dc42undefined
            dc42 administrators @EducatingSavvas
            last edited by

            @educatingsavvas said in What firmware version are you using?:

            I tried the latest beta version but found the addition of a P parameter to define a spindle tool in the M3 command problematic

            You only need the P parameter if you are in CNC mode and you want to control a spindle that is not the one used by the active tool.

            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

            EducatingSavvasundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • EducatingSavvasundefined
              EducatingSavvas @dc42
              last edited by

              @dc42 Does that mean if R in M950 and P in M563 are the same number during CNC mode, I would not need to write P# when using an M3 command? Should any spindle defining commands be in the tfree#.g tpre#.g and tpost#.g? That is to say I load the spindle separately from config.g file?

              I think the confusion with CNC is that you have the spindle and the bits, or tangential knife and blades are referred and all are referred to as tools. And that on a CNC mills the tool database in often part of a complicated control system, while for flat-bed panel CNC machine the tool database in part of the CAM software.

              dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • dc42undefined
                dc42 administrators @EducatingSavvas
                last edited by

                @educatingsavvas said in What firmware version are you using?:

                Does that mean if R in M950 and P in M563 are the same number during CNC mode, I would not need to write P# when using an M3 command?

                Yes.

                Should any spindle defining commands be in the tfree#.g tpre#.g and tpost#.g? That is to say I load the spindle separately from config.g file?

                There is no need to do that. In config.g, define all your spindles, then for each tool specify which spindle it uses in its M563 command.

                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                EducatingSavvasundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • EducatingSavvasundefined
                  EducatingSavvas @dc42
                  last edited by EducatingSavvas

                  Not sure if this got noted @dc42 but I'm finding I still have to write the P# for the M3 command to work - I've start a separate post about this.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • manpowreundefined
                    manpowre
                    last edited by

                    3.4 beta2 on my Flsun QQ-S pro with duet3d 2 wifi. upgraded today. I had 3.3 beta 2 before this. All working as it should.

                    The reason I upgraded was the bugfix for loosing z0 position of bed when homing delta. And I want to try out the accelerometer part. just gotta get the accelerometer and hook it up next week.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • massimilianocontiundefined
                      massimilianoconti
                      last edited by

                      3.4 beta 2 but has some problems I'm not happy

                      fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • fcwiltundefined
                        fcwilt @massimilianoconti
                        last edited by

                        @massimilianoconti said in What firmware version are you using?:

                        3.4 beta 2 but has some problems I'm not happy

                        Well it is a beta version.

                        I never attempt to use a beta version in a production printer but I will test them on my workbench where I have a set of electronics for just for testing things like that.

                        Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                        massimilianocontiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • massimilianocontiundefined
                          massimilianoconti @fcwilt
                          last edited by

                          @fcwilt ok however even previous versions like 3.3 were not so good, every now and then it turns out an inconsistent behavior that has no logic. there is something in the firmware that is not good is not reliable completely. I also have a zortrax and I assure you that it does not miss a beat does what it must always do perfectly

                          fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • fcwiltundefined
                            fcwilt @massimilianoconti
                            last edited by

                            @massimilianoconti said in What firmware version are you using?:

                            @fcwilt ok however even previous versions like 3.3 were not so good, every now and then it turns out an inconsistent behavior that has no logic. there is something in the firmware that is not good is not reliable completely. I also have a zortrax and I assure you that it does not miss a beat does what it must always do perfectly

                            What problems are you seeing?

                            I have four printers using very different designs all running 3.3 on both Duet 2 and Duet 3 hardware and they print just fine.

                            Frederick

                            Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Monkey68undefined
                              Monkey68
                              last edited by

                              well i have 3.3 but it has rendered my printer useless

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • pokeveundefined
                                pokeve @JuJuDelta
                                last edited by

                                @jujudelta Same here, My setup is exactly same.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • tfjieldundefined
                                  tfjield
                                  last edited by

                                  3.4.1. It's not in the poll.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Phaedruxundefined Phaedrux locked this topic
                                  • Phaedruxundefined Phaedrux unpinned this topic
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA