Is it possible to tweak the bed heater algorithm?

KTW

M303 H0 S70
M307 H0 R0.363 C315.930:315.930 D5.30 S1.00 V24.4 B0

KTW

@deckingman
Thank you, I will try this.

deckingman

@KTW If that doesn't work, you could also try increasing the "D" (dead time) parameter in your M307. Try (say) 10 secs instead of the 5.3 that the tuning algorithm calculated.

dc42

@KTW please post your entire config.g file, also the config-override.g file if you have one.

matt3o

@KTW said in Is it possible to tweak the bed heater algorithm?:

@matt3o

M303 H0 S70
M307 H0 R0.363 C315.930:315.930 D5.30 S1.00 V24.4 B0

if it were my printer I would try

M307 H0 R0.3 C400 D6.5 S1.00 V24.4 B0

if you are on SSR you don't need V

KTW

@dc42 here is my config files.
I have added the command "M570 H0 P10 T5 S300" suggested by @deckingman and this seems to have helped.

config-override.g
config.g

Phaedrux

What kind of a heated bed is it?

KTW

@Phaedrux
It's a 220V silicone heater,
similar to this one:
https://makersupplies.dk/en/heatbed/823-heatbed-silicone-heatbed-300x300mm-220v-350w.html

matt3o

@KTW as far as I understand the problem is that the sensor is integrated, for some reason RRF can't cope with that.

Phaedrux

See the reason here: https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/22155/error-heater-0-fault-temperature-rising-much-more-slowly/9?_=1616081192454

There is still room for improvement on the new algorithm to better take into account the thermal mass of the bed plate itself.