Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    How to make Prusa Slicer work

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Third-party software
    7
    26
    2.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A Former User?
      A Former User @wejrijo
      last edited by A Former User

      @wejrijo said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

      @the_dragonlord said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

      @wejrijo said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

      @the_dragonlord in the filament settings: extrusion multiplier 1.0

      no changes

      https://mattshub.com/blogs/blog/extruder-calibration

      Thank you but I know well how to set and calibrate my printer....with Ideamaker and Simplify3D I have no extrusion issue, only with PS

      PCRundefined achrnundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • PCRundefined
        PCR @A Former User
        last edited by

        @the_dragonlord Look at the Filament Override tab

        A Former User? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A Former User?
          A Former User @PCR
          last edited by

          @pcr said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

          @the_dragonlord Look at the Filament Override tab

          TinyTake28-08-2021-09-46-44.png

          empty....

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • achrnundefined
            achrn @A Former User
            last edited by

            @the_dragonlord said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

            with Ideamaker and Simplify3D I have no extrusion issue, only with PS

            Slice the same very simple model (like a three-layer solid square) and read the gcode to see if they are all consuming the same amount of filament?

            I note that in the gcode snippet up thread, your first two lines each extrude 22mm of filament over a 240mm line, that's 52.9mm3 of material, so should be laying down a 0.22mm2 line of extrusion, which if nozzle is at 0.3mm off the bed should be 0.7mm wide. If you're not getting that, it looks like a printer problem, not a slicer problem.

            A Former User? 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A Former User?
              A Former User @achrn
              last edited by

              @achrn said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

              @the_dragonlord said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

              with Ideamaker and Simplify3D I have no extrusion issue, only with PS

              Slice the same very simple model (like a three-layer solid square) and read the gcode to see if they are all consuming the same amount of filament?

              I note that in the gcode snippet up thread, your first two lines each extrude 22mm of filament over a 240mm line, that's 52.9mm3 of material, so should be laying down a 0.22mm2 line of extrusion, which if nozzle is at 0.3mm off the bed should be 0.7mm wide. If you're not getting that, it looks like a printer problem, not a slicer problem.

              The two lines come out perfectly, the problems start with the sliced GCODE

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Former User?
                A Former User @achrn
                last edited by A Former User

                @achrn said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

                @the_dragonlord said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

                with Ideamaker and Simplify3D I have no extrusion issue, only with PS

                Slice the same very simple model (like a three-layer solid square) and read the gcode to see if they are all consuming the same amount of filament?

                I note that in the gcode snippet up thread, your first two lines each extrude 22mm of filament over a 240mm line, that's 52.9mm3 of material, so should be laying down a 0.22mm2 line of extrusion, which if nozzle is at 0.3mm off the bed should be 0.7mm wide. If you're not getting that, it looks like a printer problem, not a slicer problem.

                Here are the first layers of a simple cube sliced with ideamaker:

                ;PRINTING: default-box.3mf
                ;PRINTING_ID: 0
                G1 F2400 E-3.0000
                G0 F9000 X155.292 Y155.292
                ;TYPE:WALL-OUTER
                ;WIDTH:0.585
                G1 F1500 E3.0000
                G1 F2400 X164.708 Y155.292 E0.6321
                G1 X164.708 Y164.708 E0.6321
                G1 X155.292 Y164.708 E0.6321
                G1 X155.292 Y155.292 E0.6321
                G0 F9000 X156.462 Y156.462
                ;PRINTING_TIME: 13
                ;REMAINING_TIME: 202
                ;LAYER:1
                ;Z:0.500
                ;HEIGHT:0.200
                M106 S255
                G4 P200
                M106 S255
                M104 T0 S205
                ;PRINTING: default-box.3mf
                ;PRINTING_ID: 0
                M82
                M98 P"Print_gcodes/pressure_advance_at_layer_change.g"
                M83
                G0 F900 Z0.500
                G0 F9000 X155.225 Y155.225
                ;TYPE:WALL-OUTER
                ;WIDTH:0.450
                G1 F600 X164.775 Y155.225 E0.3288
                G1 X164.775 Y164.775 E0.3288
                G1 X155.225 Y164.775 E0.3288
                G1 X155.225 Y155.225 E0.3288
                G0 F9000 X156.125 Y156.125
                ;PRINTING_TIME: 17
                ;REMAINING_TIME: 198
                ;LAYER:2
                

                Here are the same file sliced with PS:

                ;LAYER_CHANGE
                ;Z:0.44
                ;HEIGHT:0.2
                M98 P"Print_gcodes/pressure_advance_at_layer_change.g"
                G1 Z0.440 F7200.000
                G10 S205 ; set temperature
                G1 X160.200 Y169.800
                ;TYPE:External perimeter
                ;WIDTH:0.4
                G1 F900.000
                G1 X160.200 Y160.200 E0.28504
                G1 X169.800 Y160.200 E0.28504
                M73 P15 R2
                G1 X169.800 Y169.800 E0.28504
                G1 X160.260 Y169.800 E0.28325
                G1 E-3.00000 F2400.000
                G1 Z0.640 F7200.000
                G1 X160.342 Y161.178
                G1 Z0.440
                G1 E3.00000 F2400.000
                ;TYPE:Solid infill
                ;WIDTH:0.456468
                M73 P16 R2
                G1 F3600.000
                G1 X160.995 Y160.525 E0.03177
                G1 X161.580 Y160.525 E0.02011
                G1 X160.525 Y161.580 E0.05131
                G1 X160.525 Y162.165 E0.02011
                G1 X162.165 Y160.525 E0.07975
                G1 X162.749 Y160.525 E0.02011
                G1 X160.525 Y162.749 E0.10819
                G1 X160.525 Y163.334 E0.02011
                G1 X163.334 Y160.525 E0.13663
                G1 X163.919 Y160.525 E0.02011
                G1 X160.525 Y163.919 E0.16507
                G1 X160.525 Y164.504 E0.02011
                G1 X164.504 Y160.525 E0.19351
                G1 X165.089 Y160.525 E0.02011
                G1 X160.525 Y165.089 E0.22195
                G1 X160.525 Y165.674 E0.02011
                G1 X165.674 Y160.525 E0.25039
                G1 X166.259 Y160.525 E0.02011
                G1 X160.525 Y166.259 E0.27883
                G1 X160.525 Y166.843 E0.02011
                G1 X166.843 Y160.525 E0.30727
                G1 X167.428 Y160.525 E0.02011
                G1 X160.525 Y167.428 E0.33572
                M73 P17 R2
                G1 X160.525 Y168.013 E0.02011
                G1 X168.013 Y160.525 E0.36416
                G1 X168.598 Y160.525 E0.02011
                G1 X160.525 Y168.598 E0.39260
                G1 X160.525 Y169.183 E0.02011
                G1 X169.183 Y160.525 E0.42104
                G1 X169.475 Y160.525 E0.01006
                G1 X169.475 Y160.817 E0.01005
                G1 X160.817 Y169.475 E0.42104
                G1 X161.402 Y169.475 E0.02011
                G1 X169.475 Y161.402 E0.39260
                G1 X169.475 Y161.987 E0.02011
                G1 X161.987 Y169.475 E0.36416
                G1 X162.572 Y169.475 E0.02011
                G1 X169.475 Y162.572 E0.33572
                M73 P18 R2
                G1 X169.475 Y163.157 E0.02011
                G1 X163.157 Y169.475 E0.30728
                G1 X163.741 Y169.475 E0.02011
                G1 X169.475 Y163.741 E0.27884
                G1 X169.475 Y164.326 E0.02011
                G1 X164.326 Y169.475 E0.25040
                G1 X164.911 Y169.475 E0.02011
                G1 X169.475 Y164.911 E0.22196
                G1 X169.475 Y165.496 E0.02011
                G1 X165.496 Y169.475 E0.19352
                G1 X166.081 Y169.475 E0.02011
                G1 X169.475 Y166.081 E0.16507
                G1 X169.475 Y166.666 E0.02011
                G1 X166.666 Y169.475 E0.13663
                G1 X167.250 Y169.475 E0.02011
                G1 X169.475 Y167.250 E0.10819
                G1 X169.475 Y167.835 E0.02011
                G1 X167.835 Y169.475 E0.07975
                G1 X168.420 Y169.475 E0.02011
                G1 X169.475 Y168.420 E0.05131
                G1 X169.475 Y169.005 E0.02011
                G1 X168.822 Y169.658 E0.03178
                M106 S127.5
                

                They are completely different from each other.....

                A Former User? achrnundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A Former User?
                  A Former User @A Former User
                  last edited by

                  @the_dragonlord Here's what happens:

                  https://youtu.be/gVyKdpvdzXg

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • achrnundefined
                    achrn @A Former User
                    last edited by

                    @the_dragonlord said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

                    They are completely different from each other.....

                    They aren't expected to be the same.

                    Also, I note your Prusa example has a skirt, apparently with curves at the corners, so that muddies the waters. There's also reference to pressure advance in teh code, but I don't think that's more than a red herring.

                    Your ideamaker cube has this:

                    G0 F9000 X155.292 Y155.292
                    ;TYPE:WALL-OUTER
                    ;WIDTH:0.585
                    ...
                    G1 F2400 X164.708 Y155.292 E0.6321
                    G1 X164.708 Y164.708 E0.6321
                    G1 X155.292 Y164.708 E0.6321
                    G1 X155.292 Y155.292 E0.6321
                    

                    So that is simple squares, the nozzle moving 9.416mm to a side and using 0.6321mm of filament. That's 0.161mm2 extrusion.

                    The Prusaslicer cube has this

                    G1 X160.200 Y169.800
                    ;TYPE:External perimeter
                    ;WIDTH:0.4
                    ...
                    G1 X160.200 Y160.200 E0.28504
                    G1 X169.800 Y160.200 E0.28504
                    ...
                    G1 X169.800 Y169.800 E0.28504
                    G1 X160.260 Y169.800 E0.28325
                    

                    So that is simple square, the nozzle moving 9.600mm to a side and using 0.28504mm of filament. That's only 0.072mm2 extrusion

                    The comments say the Prusa is a thinner wall, but only 10% thinner. Pro-rata both to 0.45 thick would bring the Prusa up to 0.0805mm2.

                    So the Prusa is delivering half as much filament (curiously, exactly half as much) for some reason. However, I'm suspicious that the Prusa is delivering what it should - a 0.4 x 0.2 mm extrusion should be 0.4x0.2=0.08mm2. Have you, long ago, put some correction factor into the other slicers for some reason?

                    With a factor of exactly two I'd start to wonder if a 400 step stepper was swapped for a 200, and 'fixed' by putting an extrusion multiplier in? As per previous poster's suggestion, I'd go back and check calibration and configuration of the extrusion hardware from fresh, but you didn't like that suggestion.

                    achrnundefined A Former User? 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • achrnundefined
                      achrn @achrn
                      last edited by achrn

                      @achrn said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

                      G0 F9000 X155.292 Y155.292
                      ;TYPE:WALL-OUTER
                      ;WIDTH:0.585
                      ...
                      G1 F2400 X164.708 Y155.292 E0.6321
                      G1 X164.708 Y164.708 E0.6321
                      G1 X155.292 Y164.708 E0.6321
                      G1 X155.292 Y155.292 E0.6321
                      

                      So that is simple squares, the nozzle moving 9.416mm to a side and using 0.6321mm of filament. That's 0.161mm2 extrusion.

                      Aha, but I've just noticed that further down it has

                      0 F900 Z0.500
                      G0 F9000 X155.225 Y155.225
                      ;TYPE:WALL-OUTER
                      ;WIDTH:0.450
                      G1 F600 X164.775 Y155.225 E0.3288
                      G1 X164.775 Y164.775 E0.3288
                      G1 X155.225 Y164.775 E0.3288
                      G1 X155.225 Y155.225 E0.3288
                      

                      Which is much closer to the Prusa case. I don't jknow what that slicer is doing there. I still think teh GCode from Prusa is calling for about teh right amount of material.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A Former User?
                        A Former User @achrn
                        last edited by

                        @achrn said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

                        @the_dragonlord said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

                        They are completely different from each other.....

                        They aren't expected to be the same.

                        Also, I note your Prusa example has a skirt, apparently with curves at the corners, so that muddies the waters. There's also reference to pressure advance in teh code, but I don't think that's more than a red herring.

                        Your ideamaker cube has this:

                        G0 F9000 X155.292 Y155.292
                        ;TYPE:WALL-OUTER
                        ;WIDTH:0.585
                        ...
                        G1 F2400 X164.708 Y155.292 E0.6321
                        G1 X164.708 Y164.708 E0.6321
                        G1 X155.292 Y164.708 E0.6321
                        G1 X155.292 Y155.292 E0.6321
                        

                        So that is simple squares, the nozzle moving 9.416mm to a side and using 0.6321mm of filament. That's 0.161mm2 extrusion.

                        The Prusaslicer cube has this

                        G1 X160.200 Y169.800
                        ;TYPE:External perimeter
                        ;WIDTH:0.4
                        ...
                        G1 X160.200 Y160.200 E0.28504
                        G1 X169.800 Y160.200 E0.28504
                        ...
                        G1 X169.800 Y169.800 E0.28504
                        G1 X160.260 Y169.800 E0.28325
                        

                        So that is simple square, the nozzle moving 9.600mm to a side and using 0.28504mm of filament. That's only 0.072mm2 extrusion

                        The comments say the Prusa is a thinner wall, but only 10% thinner. Pro-rata both to 0.45 thick would bring the Prusa up to 0.0805mm2.

                        So the Prusa is delivering half as much filament (curiously, exactly half as much) for some reason. However, I'm suspicious that the Prusa is delivering what it should - a 0.4 x 0.2 mm extrusion should be 0.4x0.2=0.08mm2. Have you, long ago, put some correction factor into the other slicers for some reason?

                        With a factor of exactly two I'd start to wonder if a 400 step stepper was swapped for a 200, and 'fixed' by putting an extrusion multiplier in? As per previous poster's suggestion, I'd go back and check calibration and configuration of the extrusion hardware from fresh, but you didn't like that suggestion.

                        Thanks for your answer, in Ideamaker I haven't made any adjustment on the stepper steps/mm or some kind of multiplier...It not I didn't liked the suggestion, it's that they are all steps that I've made right now and I'm sure that in Ideamaker I have no firmware overrides about step/mm or so on...I've just made several thin wall tests to get the exact extrusion multiplier for all my filaments....I really don't know what's happening....even with Simplify3D it all gone well...only with PS there are problems...

                        gloomyandyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • gloomyandyundefined
                          gloomyandy @A Former User
                          last edited by

                          @the_dragonlord How did you tune your extruder steps/mm set in config.g? If it involved something that used your slicer you may have in effect tuned for that. What value do you have set for steps/mm in your config.g file and what extruder are you using?

                          A Former User? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A Former User?
                            A Former User @gloomyandy
                            last edited by

                            @gloomyandy said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

                            @the_dragonlord How did you tune your extruder steps/mm set in config.g? If it involved something that used your slicer you may have in effect tuned for that. What value do you have set for steps/mm in your config.g file and what extruder are you using?

                            415 step/mm, original bondtech BMG

                            gloomyandyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • gloomyandyundefined
                              gloomyandy @A Former User
                              last edited by

                              @the_dragonlord Assuming that has a standard 1.8 degree stepper (does it?), that sounds fine.

                              A Former User? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • A Former User?
                                A Former User @gloomyandy
                                last edited by

                                @gloomyandy said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

                                @the_dragonlord Assuming that has a standard 1.8 degree stepper (does it?), that sounds fine.

                                it sound because it is fine 😊 with other slicers I have no problems

                                engikeneerundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • Phaedruxundefined
                                  Phaedrux Moderator
                                  last edited by

                                  Is the first layer height the same? Same width and flow rate?

                                  Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                                  A Former User? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • engikeneerundefined
                                    engikeneer @A Former User
                                    last edited by

                                    @the_dragonlord I've used PS for years with issues so am slightly perplexed by your issue!

                                    One thought - are the filament/printer/print profiles that you're editing the ones that PS is using to slice the file? I.E. Do these:
                                    0ffc7ef2-16b8-4b61-9067-e43e90d5bf4f-image.png

                                    Match these:
                                    df99b43b-bdf8-4f41-a5d0-3d1b1ea2084f-image.png

                                    Could simply be that you're actualy slicing with one of the default 2.85mm profiles?

                                    Failing that, if you can export your config from PS (File, Export, Export config), post it here and I can try it on mine to see what's up. Might need to rename the filetype to .txt to upload it to the forum

                                    E3D TC with D3Mini and Toolboards.
                                    Home-built CoreXY, Duet Wifi, Chimera direct drive, 2x BMG, 300x300x300 build volume
                                    i3 clone with a bunch of mods

                                    A Former User? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • A Former User?
                                      A Former User @Phaedrux
                                      last edited by

                                      @phaedrux said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

                                      Is the first layer height the same? Same width and flow rate?

                                      yes

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A Former User?
                                        A Former User @engikeneer
                                        last edited by A Former User

                                        @engikeneer said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

                                        @the_dragonlord I've used PS for years with issues so am slightly perplexed by your issue!

                                        One thought - are the filament/printer/print profiles that you're editing the ones that PS is using to slice the file? I.E. Do these:
                                        0ffc7ef2-16b8-4b61-9067-e43e90d5bf4f-image.png

                                        Match these:
                                        df99b43b-bdf8-4f41-a5d0-3d1b1ea2084f-image.png

                                        Could simply be that you're actualy slicing with one of the default 2.85mm profiles?

                                        Failing that, if you can export your config from PS (File, Export, Export config), post it here and I can try it on mine to see what's up. Might need to rename the filetype to .txt to upload it to the forum

                                        no, it's not my case, the profiles, unfortunately, are correct. Here's my config fileconfig.ini.txt

                                        Thanks!

                                        engikeneerundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • engikeneerundefined
                                          engikeneer @A Former User
                                          last edited by

                                          @the_dragonlord I think I've found some of your issue. Your first layer extrusion width is set to 120%, so over a 0.24mm first layer height, you only get 0.288mm width lines for your first layer. Personally, I set all these as widths in mm so I know what I'm getting even if I change the layer height.

                                          d84fe953-38fa-4b27-a166-5ec17578b860-image.png

                                          You can see this if you look at the sliced line widths on the plater. Looks like the brim and infil are affected, but the external perimeter is slicing at 0.4mm which you specified.

                                          af52fac8-a2fa-4317-94c6-ddb4d5ceef15-image.png

                                          The other thing I noticed is that you are using absolute extrusion. General advice is to use relative extrusion because you may lose accuracy in long prints. Note that you've got M92 in your custom start code there too!

                                          E3D TC with D3Mini and Toolboards.
                                          Home-built CoreXY, Duet Wifi, Chimera direct drive, 2x BMG, 300x300x300 build volume
                                          i3 clone with a bunch of mods

                                          A Former User? achrnundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • A Former User?
                                            A Former User @engikeneer
                                            last edited by

                                            @engikeneer said in How to make Prusa Slicer work:

                                            @the_dragonlord I think I've found some of your issue. Your first layer extrusion width is set to 120%, so over a 0.24mm first layer height, you only get 0.288mm width lines for your first layer. Personally, I set all these as widths in mm so I know what I'm getting even if I change the layer height.

                                            d84fe953-38fa-4b27-a166-5ec17578b860-image.png

                                            You can see this if you look at the sliced line widths on the plater. Looks like the brim and infil are affected, but the external perimeter is slicing at 0.4mm which you specified.

                                            af52fac8-a2fa-4317-94c6-ddb4d5ceef15-image.png

                                            The other thing I noticed is that you are using absolute extrusion. General advice is to use relative extrusion because you may lose accuracy in long prints. Note that you've got M92 in your custom start code there too!

                                            excellent, thanks! i'll try your suggestions when I'll return home! what is your setting for the first layer extrusion width?

                                            engikeneerundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA