I could use some help
-
@droftarts @fcwilt if we're going to work on this together, I need to know you two are in agreement before I do anything.
Do you both agree that I should tape X and Y closed? Then M119 again?
-
@mac said in I could use some help:
@fcwilt wait, fcwilt? not droftarts? jeeze you guys are ganging up on me!
No - it just gets confusing when posts overlap in time.
I'm typing, your typing, droftarts is typing - and things get a bit out of order - time wise.
Frederick
-
@mac said in I could use some help:
@droftarts @fcwilt if we're going to work on this together, I need to know you two are in agreement before I do anything.
Do you both agree that I should tape X and Y closed? Then M119 again?
Mac! You've cut me to the quick! Have you no faith in me!
I've only been doing this stuff for years.
Frederick
Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6
-
@fcwilt @droftarts I closed the z-endstop with my left finger, and hit M110 Send with my right finger. M119 reported Z: at end stop, Z probe: not stopped.
I'm not making this up, guys.
-
@fcwilt @droftarts I'm just trying to be respectful to Ian and you.
-
@mac I’m not able to reply promptly now, I’m away from my computer. @fcwilt knows what he’s doing, though please keep it simple, Frederick!
Ian
Bed-slinger - Mini5+ WiFi/1LC | RRP Fisher v1 - D2 WiFi | Polargraph - D2 WiFi | TronXY X5S - 6HC/Roto | CNC router - 6HC | Tractus3D T1250 - D2 Eth
-
@droftarts said in I could use some help:
@mac I’m not able to reply promptly now, I’m away from my computer. @fcwilt knows what he’s doing, though please keep it simple, Frederick!
Ian
I try to keep it simple, I really do.
Frederick
-
; Drives M569 P0.0 S1 ; physical drive 0.0 goes forwards M569 P0.1 S1 ; physical drive 0.1 goes forwards M569 P0.2 S1 ; physical drive 0.2 goes forwards M569 P0.3 S1 ; physical drive 0.3 goes forwards M584 X0.0 Y0.1 Z0.2 E0.3 ; set drive mapping M92 X40.00 Y40.00 Z2000.00 E420.00 ; set steps per mm M350 X16 Y16 Z16 E16 I1 ; configure microstepping with interpolation M566 X900.00 Y900.00 Z60.00 E120.00 ; set maximum instantaneous speed changes (mm/min) M203 X6000.00 Y6000.00 Z600.00 E1200.00 ; set maximum speeds (mm/min) M201 X500.00 Y500.00 Z200.00 E250.00 ; set accelerations (mm/s^2) M906 X600 Y600 Z600 E600 ; set motor currents (mA) M84 S0 ; Disable motor idle current reduction -
@mac M92 cut and pasted to before M350, board rebooted.
-
@fcwilt okay, I get it, let's continue on, shall we, Frederick?
-
@mac said in I could use some help:
@fcwilt @droftarts I closed the z-endstop with my left finger, and hit M110 Send with my right finger. M119 reported Z: at end stop, Z probe: not stopped.
I'm not making this up, guys.
I know you are not. I have complete faith in you.
So as far as you can see M119 reports that same for the Z endstop switch regardless of it being pressed closed or not?
Interesting.
How about doing the same for the X and Y endstop switches. You can press just one at a time and execute the M119 for each one. It is not necessary to press them both at the same time.
What we want to verify is that M119 reports the correct thing for both states of the endstop switches, pressed and not pressed.
Frederick
-
@fcwilt I just ran M119 again, it's reporting: X not stopped, Y not stopped, Z at min stop, Z probe not stopped.
-
@fcwilt I just verified that with the z-endstop pushed down, M119 is reporting the same information as above.
-
@mac said in I could use some help:
@fcwilt I just ran M119 again, it's reporting: X not stopped, Y not stopped, Z at min stop, Z probe not stopped.
OK let's leave Z for now and test X and Y.
Frederick
-
@fcwilt I'm going to test the X endstop, and then the Y endstop. Please wait for my report.
-
@mac
I'm not going anywhere.
Frederick
-
@fcwilt okay, here are the results: with X endstop pressed down, M119 reports X at min stop. With Y endstop pressed down, M119 reports Y at min stop.
Interestingly, M119 continues to report Z at min stop even though I'm NOT pressing it down?
-
; Axis Limits M208 X0 Y0 Z0 S1 ; set axis minima M208 X220 Y220 Z240 S0 ; set axis maxima -
@fcwilt are the S0 and S1 reversed?
-
@mac said in I could use some help:
@fcwilt are the S0 and S1 reversed?
No they are correct.
But, just FYI, there is a simpler form of M208 (at least I think it is simpler)
M208 X0:220 Y0:220 Z0:240
Notice no S0 or S1.
The number before the : character is the min value for the axis specified by the letter.
The number after the : character is the max value for the axis specified by the letter.
I find it easier to remember "min then max" rather then "is it S0 or S1".
That's just me.
Frederick
