Spindle nema 34 duet 2 wifi

paolozampini1973

@o_lampe said in Spindle nema 34 duet 2 wifi:

@droftarts said in Spindle nema 34 duet 2 wifi:

such a 'spindle' mode for stepper drivers could be added to the firmware wishlist?
yes

I believe, we've asked infinite rotation as FW feature before.
But there was a good reason, why it's complicated to implement. Can't describe it with my own words. Brain is frozen

JoergS5

Firmware organizes all axis movements in time frames (X moves n mm in 0.1 seconds, Y m mm in the same time etc.). A continuous movement doesn't have a time frame (because it's infinity time), so it's a problem.

A solution could be to add a separate FreeRTOS task which makes the continuous movement for a (stepper-)motor by generating own stepper signals without any time frame planning. It would run isolated from all other movements, but this needs to be added to the firmware, something for the wishlist.

o_lampe

@JoergS5
Even that solution wouldn't work for thread cutting. Just switching on the isolated pulse generator wouldn't happen in sync with acceleration of the other axis.
That way, you can only cut a thread in one go, but AFAIK you need several runs and always have to find the same starting point...

paolozampini1973

@JoergS5 said in Spindle nema 34 duet 2 wifi:

Firmware organizes all axis movements in time frames (X moves n mm in 0.1 seconds, Y m mm in the same time etc.). A continuous movement doesn't have a time frame (because it's infinity time), so it's a problem.

A solution could be to add a separate FreeRTOS task which makes the continuous movement for a (stepper-)motor by generating own stepper signals without any time frame planning. It would run isolated from all other movements, but this needs to be added to the firmware, something for the wishlist.

thank you

paolozampini1973

@dc42
firmware from what I understood from the various posts it seems that it is not possible to have with a stepper motor the same functionalities of the vfd motor because the firmware cannot handle it is it possible to implement this function please

JoergS5

@o_lampe said in Spindle nema 34 duet 2 wifi:

have to find the same starting point...

my proposal is to implement it step by step and start with a continuous axis in a separate task. This allows to gather experience wheter e.g. performance is sufficient.

In longer perspective

FreeRTOS trasks are able to inter-process-communicate, i.e. tell each others the status, i.e. synchronize tasks
the tasks could be delegated to separate cards then, so step signals don't disturb each other
the tasks could execute different kinematics, so multiple kinematics become possible
a synchronzation process for all boards through CAN can make sure that a global job scheduler can manage the movements. E.g. by synchronizing the system tick numbers

paolozampini1973

@JoergS5 said in Spindle nema 34 duet 2 wifi:

FreeRTOS

thanks for the answer But honestly I don't want to start writing a program to make a function that in my opinion was a very very very simple function

JoergS5

@paolozampini1973 no, no, I don't mean that you do it, but one of the developers of RepRapFirmware. I meant this with wishlist: there is a list somewhere what features are wished to be added to future versions.

A simple requirement, a single continuous axis without synchronization, which is useful for many users have a much higher chance to be implemented than the other ideas I wrote.

paolozampini1973

@JoergS5 said in Spindle nema 34 duet 2 wifi:

@paolozampini1973 no, no, I don't mean that you do it, but one of the developers of RepRapFirmware. I meant this with wishlist: there is a list somewhere what features are wished to be added to future versions.

A simple requirement, a single continuous axis without synchronization, which is useful for many users have a much higher chance to be implemented than the other ideas I wrote.

now i understand in the function wishlist But where is this list where you have to make the request?

dc42

@paolozampini1973 @CNCModeller if there is enough interest then I can look at providing the option to run a stepper motor as a spindle in a future version of RRF. However, it's likely to be a Duet 3 feature only because of lack of flash memory on Duet 2.

jay_s_uk

@dc42 it would be a good use case for the 1HCL boards. maintaining a certain RPM with feedback

o_lampe

@jay_s_uk
That would make sense, if the feedback loop would control the spindle/stepper current. Or do you want to reduce XYZ-speed, when the stepper skips steps due to overload?

jay_s_uk

@o_lampe thats the thing to work out i suppose. i did think increase current but that would only do so much so slowing things down may make more sense

o_lampe

@jay_s_uk
Worst case would be cancelling the job. "Cutting a thread" is not too forgiving in terms of skipped steps.

dc42

Will a stepper motor provide sufficient speed and torque? Stepper motors are limited to a few revs/second due to back emf.

jay_s_uk

@dc42 i have my doubts whether it would

CNCModeller

@dc42 said in Spindle nema 34 duet 2 wifi:

@paolozampini1973 @CNCModeller if there is enough interest then I can look at providing the option to run a stepper motor as a spindle in a future version of RRF. However, it's likely to be a Duet 3 feature only because of lack of flash memory on Duet 2.

@dc42 I'm just speculating on solutions for both threading on a lathe and rigid tapping on a mill. So specifically using a stepper as a spindle drive is just one option.

The potential to do limited milling on a lathe using a cross slide mounted milling head with the lathe axis as a rotary would also improve workflow.

I'm not sure if any of this would impact performance on my polar printer, especially since I'm using the 1HCL on that axis anyway.

In terms of solutions I'm open, just interested in this as one option.

dc42

@CNCModeller threading and tapping should already be possible, just configure it as a rotary axis.

paolozampini1973

@dc42 @CNCModeller @jay_s_uk
a stepper motor can reach 3200 RPM WITHOUT step loss tests done by me personally (nema 17 , 23 , 34 ) and as we know the advantage is the maximum torque at under 500 - 800 rpm and working on the export of materials at low speed leads only advantages because:

the metal heats up little
vibrations are very low
high precision
for most of the processes it requires very little lubrication and for other processes there is no need to lubricate
working plastic parts at 200 RPM they work very well having a high torque
VFD motors WORK from 0-22000 RPM i ne or 2 types example: a 3kw at 50 Newton +or- and a 1,5kw disadvantages:
high current draw
below 1000 rpm very low torque and does not allow to do some machining especially at 200 RPM
it takes a lot of lubrication I'LL STOP HERE BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH MORE TO SAY ABOUT THE DISADVANTAGES
I CLOSE BY SAYING THAT THE LOW SPEED IS THE BEST IN THE END EVEN IF THE PROCESSING TIMES LONGER

OR I READ THAT THERE ARE NUMEROUS PEOPLE INTERESTED
I ASK TO ADD TO @DC42 THE FOLLOWING FUNCTIONSIN DUET 2 WIFI, IN ME THE MOST SUITABLE:
MILL :

AXIS FOR CONTINUOUS USE MILLING (ROTATIVE) WHICH HAS THE SAME FUNCTION AS THE VFD
LATHE:
A OR B OR C AXIS FOR THREADING AND TURNING
I'M SORRY IF I WAS LITTLE SYNTHETIC IN THE EXPLANATIONS AND THANK YOU EVERYONE FOR PARTICIPATING
@DC42 I WOULD LIKE TO HELP

paolozampini1973

@dc42 said in Spindle nema 34 duet 2 wifi:

Will a stepper motor provide sufficient speed and torque? Stepper motors are limited to a few revs/second due to back emf.

the stepper motor provides high torque at low revs which the vfd motor does not and this brings many advantages for my experience that I have done some technical tests