Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    prints not completing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
    Tuning and tweaking
    5
    17
    608
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • alankilianundefined
      alankilian @rickgomez2003
      last edited by

      @rickgomez2003 said in prints not completing:

      === SBC interface ===
      Transfer state: 5, failed transfers: 2, checksum errors: 22
      RX/TX seq numbers: 773/6602
      SPI underruns 22, overruns 0
      State: 5, disconnects: 1, timeouts: 1 total, 1 by SBC, IAP RAM available 0x2ad48
      Buffer RX/TX: 0/0-0, open files: 0

      I don't know much about your setup, but these errors seem like a bad thing.

      Is your SBC-to Duet connection good?

      I have NO experience with this interface, so although my post might be an attempt to be helpful, it might not be helpful at all. If so, I apologize.

      SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

      rickgomez2003undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • rickgomez2003undefined
        rickgomez2003 @alankilian
        last edited by

        @alankilian
        Thank you for the reply. I have just gone and checked the connection to the SBC and duet 3 and all seams to be well. I will go back and reseat everything just incase.

        rickgomez2003undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • rickgomez2003undefined
          rickgomez2003 @rickgomez2003
          last edited by

          @rickgomez2003

          did it again

          M122
=== Diagnostics ===
RepRapFirmware for Duet 3 MB6HC version 3.4.5 (2022-11-30 19:35:23) running on Duet 3 MB6HC v1.01 (SBC mode)
Board ID: 08DJM-956BA-NA3TJ-6J9FL-3S86L-9T9LT
Used output buffers: 1 of 40 (21 max)
=== RTOS ===
Static ram: 152760
Dynamic ram: 67596 of which 0 recycled
Never used RAM 126788, free system stack 114 words
Tasks: SBC(resourceWait:,0.7%,466) HEAT(notifyWait,0.0%,322) Move(notifyWait,0.9%,241) CanReceiv(notifyWait,0.0%,774) CanSender(notifyWait,0.0%,328) CanClock(delaying,0.0%,339) TMC(notifyWait,8.8%,57) MAIN(running,89.5%,923) IDLE(ready,0.0%,30), total 100.0%
Owned mutexes: HTTP(MAIN)
=== Platform ===
Last reset 01:19:09 ago, cause: software
Last software reset at 2023-02-02 12:23, reason: User, GCodes spinning, available RAM 130564, slot 2
Software reset code 0x0003 HFSR 0x00000000 CFSR 0x00000000 ICSR 0x00400000 BFAR 0x00000000 SP 0x00000000 Task SBC Freestk 0 n/a
Error status: 0x00
Aux0 errors 0,0,0
Step timer max interval 134
MCU temperature: min 52.0, current 56.7, max 56.9
Supply voltage: min 24.5, current 24.6, max 24.7, under voltage events: 0, over voltage events: 0, power good: yes
12V rail voltage: min 11.9, current 12.0, max 12.1, under voltage events: 0
Heap OK, handles allocated/used 99/0, heap memory allocated/used/recyclable 2048/800/800, gc cycles 0
Events: 0 queued, 0 completed
Driver 0: standstill, SG min 0, mspos 280, reads 22742, writes 19 timeouts 0
Driver 1: standstill, SG min 0, mspos 504, reads 22742, writes 19 timeouts 0
Driver 2: standstill, SG min 0, mspos 568, reads 22742, writes 19 timeouts 0
Driver 3: standstill, SG min 0, mspos 56, reads 22743, writes 19 timeouts 0
Driver 4: standstill, SG min 0, mspos 360, reads 22743, writes 19 timeouts 0
Driver 5: standstill, SG min 0, mspos 8, reads 22751, writes 11 timeouts 0
Date/time: 2023-02-02 13:42:10
Slowest loop: 60.72ms; fastest: 0.04ms
=== Storage ===
Free file entries: 10
SD card 0 not detected, interface speed: 37.5MBytes/sec
SD card longest read time 0.0ms, write time 0.0ms, max retries 0
=== Move ===
DMs created 125, segments created 28, maxWait 1182985ms, bed compensation in use: mesh, comp offset 0.000
=== MainDDARing ===
Scheduled moves 36262, completed 36262, hiccups 0, stepErrors 0, LaErrors 0, Underruns [0, 0, 3], CDDA state -1
=== AuxDDARing ===
Scheduled moves 0, completed 0, hiccups 0, stepErrors 0, LaErrors 0, Underruns [0, 0, 0], CDDA state -1
=== Heat ===
Bed heaters 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1, chamber heaters -1 -1 -1 -1, ordering errs 0
=== GCodes ===
Segments left: 0
Movement lock held by null
HTTP* is doing "M122" in state(s) 0
Telnet is idle in state(s) 0
File* is idle in state(s) 0
USB is idle in state(s) 0
Aux is idle in state(s) 0
Trigger* is idle in state(s) 0
Queue* is idle in state(s) 0
LCD is idle in state(s) 0
SBC is idle in state(s) 0
Daemon is idle in state(s) 0
Aux2 is idle in state(s) 0
Autopause is idle in state(s) 0
Code queue is empty
=== CAN ===
Messages queued 76114, received 95547, lost 0, boc 0
Longest wait 3ms for reply type 6053, peak Tx sync delay 277, free buffers 50 (min 45), ts 23747/23746/0
Tx timeouts 0,0,0,0,0,0
=== SBC interface ===
Transfer state: 5, failed transfers: 1, checksum errors: 26
RX/TX seq numbers: 54820/5364
SPI underruns 24, overruns 0
State: 5, disconnects: 1, timeouts: 1 total, 1 by SBC, IAP RAM available 0x2ad48
Buffer RX/TX: 0/0-0, open files: 0
=== Duet Control Server ===
Duet Control Server v3.4.5
File /opt/dsf/sd/gcodes/wall-honeycomb-224x190size(mk3s).gcode is selected, processing
File:
Buffered code: G1 X30.6 Y100.821 E0.5361
Buffered code: G1 X30.6 Y87.425 E0.52708
Buffered code: G1 X42.398 Y80.615 E0.53602
Buffered code: G1 X42.398 Y66.759 E0.54525
Buffered code: G1 X30.6 Y59.945 E0.5361
Buffered code: G1 X30.6 Y46.549 E0.52708
Buffered code: G1 X42.198 Y39.855 E0.52694
Buffered code: G1 X53.998 Y46.665 E0.53609
Buffered code: G1 X65.798 Y39.855 E0.53609
Buffered code: G1 X77.598 Y46.665 E0.53609
Buffered code: G1 X89.398 Y39.855 E0.53609
Buffered code: G1 X101.2 Y46.665 E0.53616
Buffered code: G1 X113 Y39.855 E0.53609
Buffered code: G1 X124.8 Y46.665 E0.53609
Buffered code: G1 X136.6 Y39.855 E0.53609
Buffered code: G1 X148.4 Y46.665 E0.53609
Buffered code: G1 X160.198 Y39.855 E0.53602
Buffered code: G1 X171.998 Y46.665 E0.53609
Buffered code: G1 X183.798 Y39.855 E0.53609
Buffered code: G1 X195.598 Y46.665 E0.53609
Buffered code: G1 X207.398 Y39.855 E0.53609
Buffered code: G1 X219.2 Y46.665 E0.53616
Buffered code: G1 X231 Y39.855 E0.53609
Buffered code: G1 X242.6 Y46.55 E0.527
Buffered code: G1 X242.6 Y60.175 E0.53616
Buffered code: G1 X254.4 Y66.989 E0.53617
Buffered code: G1 X254.4 Y80.385 E0.52708
Buffered code: G1 X242.6 Y87.195 E0.53609
Buffered code: G1 X242.6 Y101.051 E0.54525
Buffered code: G1 X254.4 Y107.865 E0.53617
Buffered code: G1 X254.4 Y121.261 E0.52708
Buffered code: G1 X242.6 Y128.073 E0.53613
==> 1536 bytes
Code buffer space: 4096
Configured SPI speed: 8000000Hz, TfrRdy pin glitches: 710
Full transfers per second: 39.15, max time between full transfers: 75.3ms, max pin wait times: 56.7ms/9.8ms
Codes per second: 7.95
Maximum length of RX/TX data transfers: 3136/1104
2/2/2023, 1:39:56 PM	Connection to Duet established
2/2/2023, 1:39:56 PM	Warning: Lost connection to Duet (SPI connection reset because the number of maximum retries has been exceeded)
2/2/2023, 1:31:23 PM	Connection to Duet established
2/2/2023, 1:31:23 PM	Warning: Lost connection to Duet (SPI connection reset because the number of maximum retries has been exceeded)
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Phaedruxundefined
            Phaedrux Moderator
            last edited by

            What kind of cable are you using between the Duet and Pi?

            Can you try increasing your logging level on the Pi and capturing another failure for us?

            https://github.com/Duet3D/DuetSoftwareFramework/wiki/SBC-Setup-Guide#troubleshooting

            Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

            rickgomez2003undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • rickgomez2003undefined
              rickgomez2003 @Phaedrux
              last edited by

              @Phaedrux

              I will increase the logging and try the steps listed in the link. I am using the ribbon cable that came with the Duet 3.

              Thank you once again for your time.

              rickgomez2003undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • rickgomez2003undefined
                rickgomez2003 @rickgomez2003
                last edited by

                @rickgomez2003
                From the journal

                 journalctl -u duetcontrolserver -e
Feb 02 14:05:41 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [info] Finished macro file bed.g
Feb 02 14:05:41 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [info] Starting macro file deployprobe.g on channel File
Feb 02 14:05:41 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [info] Running deployprobe.g
Feb 02 14:05:43 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [info] Lift Z in advance of deploy
Feb 02 14:05:55 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [info] Probe Pickup complete
Feb 02 14:05:59 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [info] Macro deployprobe.g complete
Feb 02 14:05:59 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [info] Finished macro file deployprobe.g
Feb 02 14:08:35 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [info] Starting macro file retractprobe.g on channel File
Feb 02 14:08:35 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [info] running retractprobe.g macro
Feb 02 14:08:51 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [info] Macro retractprobe.g complete
Feb 02 14:08:51 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [info] Finished macro file retractprobe.g
Feb 02 14:08:51 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] the height map has a substantial Z offset. Suggest use Z-probe to establish Z=0 datum, then re-probe the mesh.
Feb 02 14:08:51 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [info] 30 points probed, min error 0.069, max error 0.375, mean 0.233, deviation 0.084
Feb 02 14:08:51 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: Height map saved to file 0:/sys/heightmap.csv
Feb 02 15:50:26 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0x1ad8052f, got 0x6115fcce)
Feb 02 15:50:26 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0x1ad8052f, got 0x9934e6a0)
Feb 02 15:50:26 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0x1ad8052f, got 0xceae592f)
Feb 02 15:50:26 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Lost connection to Duet (SPI connection reset because the number of maximum retries has been exceeded)
Feb 02 15:50:26 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [info] Connection to Duet established
Feb 02 15:54:26 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0xa8babc30, got 0x5eb21be9)
Feb 02 15:59:12 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0x832bd8b9, got 0x8d0ae49a)
Feb 02 16:01:06 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0xd74685f5, got 0x874202a8)
Feb 02 16:20:19 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0xfcd4a082, got 0x0e3d35b7)
Feb 02 16:20:19 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0xfcd4a082, got 0xc2242c57)
Feb 02 16:23:19 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0x3d925efb, got 0x1011a829)
Feb 02 16:23:19 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0x3d925efb, got 0x92b7bd24)
Feb 02 16:23:28 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0xe223f5e0, got 0xb16d02b1)
Feb 02 16:23:28 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0xe223f5e0, got 0x123730b3)
Feb 02 16:23:44 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0xdcd2951e, got 0x15b6d86f)
Feb 02 16:53:33 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0x8d27c627, got 0x021f985c)
Feb 02 16:53:40 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad header CRC32 (expected 0xecb4971d, got 0x76da9b1d)
Feb 02 16:53:40 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Note: RepRapFirmware didn't receive valid data either (code 0x00000005)
Feb 02 16:53:50 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0x2621aa62, got 0x9456a1e2)
Feb 02 16:55:05 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0xbe11550b, got 0x4efb7681)
Feb 02 16:55:25 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0x9949948c, got 0xb1f66eaa)
Feb 02 16:56:51 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0x5f2bbf70, got 0xa805d97d)
Feb 02 17:40:13 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0xc2bc5005, got 0xed70967b)
Feb 02 17:40:13 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0xc2bc5005, got 0xa1e08861)
Feb 02 17:40:13 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0xc2bc5005, got 0xb4597201)
Feb 02 17:40:13 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Lost connection to Duet (SPI connection reset because the number of maximum retries has been exceeded)
Feb 02 17:40:13 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [info] Connection to Duet established
Feb 02 17:42:45 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0x5b25cb20, got 0xc293ffa7)
Feb 02 17:42:45 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0x5b25cb20, got 0x81d87942)
Feb 02 17:42:50 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0x04a883bc, got 0x092a4cea)
Feb 02 17:43:07 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad header CRC32 (expected 0x9f3f9d2b, got 0xadc5b0a0)
Feb 02 17:43:07 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Note: RepRapFirmware didn't receive valid data either (code 0x00000005)
Feb 02 17:43:54 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0x14954ec0, got 0x38b2b2c3)
Feb 02 17:43:55 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0x92fc17e8, got 0x492942ae)
Feb 02 17:47:31 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad header CRC32 (expected 0xb666da13, got 0xd64cbb13)
Feb 02 17:47:31 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Note: RepRapFirmware didn't receive valid data either (code 0x00000005)
Feb 02 17:47:34 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] RepRapFirmware got a bad data checksum
Feb 02 17:47:47 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0x72d0e460, got 0x32dc4936)
Feb 02 17:48:03 Mod-Railcore DuetControlServer[596]: [warn] Bad data CRC32 (expected 0xd8541d93, got 0x1e9e204c)
                T3P3Tonyundefined alankilianundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T3P3Tonyundefined
                  T3P3Tony administrators @rickgomez2003
                  last edited by

                  @chrishamm could you have a look at the journal output ☝

                  www.duet3d.com

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • alankilianundefined
                    alankilian @rickgomez2003
                    last edited by

                    @rickgomez2003 Yeah, that certainly looks like a bad cable.

                    Do you have a GOOD ground connecting the power supply of the Raspberry PI to the power supply of the Duet?

                    If not, you could try that.

                    Although the cable SHOULD supply enough ground points, clearly there's something going wrong across that communication's cable.

                    SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

                    rickgomez2003undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • rickgomez2003undefined
                      rickgomez2003 @alankilian
                      last edited by

                      @alankilian said in prints not completing:

                      @rickgomez2003 Yeah, that certainly looks like a bad cable.

                      Do you have a GOOD ground connecting the power supply of the Raspberry PI to the power supply of the Duet?

                      If not, you could try that.

                      Although the cable SHOULD supply enough ground points, clearly there's something going wrong across that communication's cable.

                      Thank you for the insight, I am trying this again but this time powering the 5v via the EX_5V header from the same meanwell power supply I am using for the SBC and removing the jumper. I will update you with the progress.

                      Thank you!

                      chrishammundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • chrishammundefined
                        chrishamm administrators @rickgomez2003
                        last edited by

                        @rickgomez2003 I agree with @alankilian, that does look like a bad cable. You may be able to improve signal integrity between both boards by shielding the ribbon cable or by adding a ferrite bead.

                        Duet software engineer

                        rickgomez2003undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • rickgomez2003undefined
                          rickgomez2003 @chrishamm
                          last edited by

                          @chrishamm

                          Thank you for the reply, I will try that and attempt to get a new cable. The system did fail again just took a lot longer. I will try your suggestion and report back.

                          Thank you all for your time.
                          @alankilian @T3P3Tony @Phaedrux @chrishamm

                          rickgomez2003undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • rickgomez2003undefined
                            rickgomez2003 @rickgomez2003
                            last edited by

                            @alankilian @T3P3Tony @Phaedrux @chrishamm

                            Please mark this as solved it was a bad cable that caused the issue. I have tested and verified the issue and resolution.

                            Thank you for the quick and extremely helpful responses!

                            alankilianundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                            • Phaedruxundefined Phaedrux marked this topic as a question
                            • Phaedruxundefined Phaedrux has marked this topic as solved
                            • alankilianundefined
                              alankilian @rickgomez2003
                              last edited by

                              @rickgomez2003 EXCELLENT!!!

                              Thanks for taking the time to record all your observations. It will help the next person (and all of us frankly) solve their problem.

                              SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA