Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Duet3D announces new tool board at FormNext

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    25
    107
    8.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • dc42undefined
      dc42 administrators @Surgikill
      last edited by

      @Surgikill not yet, Tony normally does the drawings and STEP models but he is very busy with Formnext follow-up and SMRRF preparation.

      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • edspedundefined
        edsped @Surgikill
        last edited by

        @Surgikill said in Duet3D announces new tool board at FormNext:

        @fcwilt said in Duet3D announces new tool board at FormNext:

        @Herve_Smith

        You consider the prices to be an issue?

        The money I spend on hardware is dwarfed by the money I spend on filament.

        Frederick

        Toolboards are primarily made for tool changer setups, so multiply your cost difference by the number of toolheads. I'm currently building a tool changer, and each toolhead is going to run me close to $400. At some point, cost becomes a favor. When my toolhead alone is over double the cost of an ender 3 you have to take a step back and reevaluate.

        I run RRF-36's on my toolchanger and wish I set it up that way sooner.

        Surgikillundefined gnydickundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • Surgikillundefined
          Surgikill @edsped
          last edited by

          @edsped those actually look like they might work perfectly. A ton cheaper too.

          edspedundefined fcwiltundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • edspedundefined
            edsped @Surgikill
            last edited by

            @Surgikill said in Duet3D announces new tool board at FormNext:

            @edsped those actually look like they might work perfectly. A ton cheaper too.

            No issues on my end so far but I have to admit I'm intrigued by the scanning probe but at more than twice the price for the board not sure if it would be worth it.

            Surgikillundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • fcwiltundefined
              fcwilt @Surgikill
              last edited by

              @Surgikill said in Duet3D announces new tool board at FormNext:

              those actually look like they might work perfectly. A ton cheaper too.

              But they are a funny shape. Who wants a printer with parts that have a funny shape. Give me a good old rectangle every time. 🤣

              Frederick

              Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

              A Former User? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Surgikillundefined
                Surgikill @edsped
                last edited by

                @edsped Scanning probe would be good. I guess I could have one toolhead with a scanning probe and a euclid probe, and use either depending on the build surface, then do the rest with a fly-rrf-36.

                @fcwilt 🤣 Although, I do like that most of the connectors are along the bottom edge, and the stepper is along the top. Connectors along the sides have been a real pain for me designing slim toolheads so I can increase tool capacity.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • A Former User?
                  A Former User @fcwilt
                  last edited by

                  @fcwilt My Orbiter extruders have the same funny shape at the back thanks to their NEMA14 stepper so I am set. And it is amazing how you can hide the funny boards shape inside an enclosure so the one on the NEMA17 does not need a sheet thrown over it if companies is over.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • edspedundefined
                    edsped
                    last edited by

                    I actually like the shape and as has already been said, having connectors on all 4 sides seems like it would add clutter. For me the RRF-36's are nice and compact. I'll likely grab the step file when it's released and see how it compares though.

                    IMG_2115.JPG IMG_2114.JPG

                    fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • fcwiltundefined
                      fcwilt @edsped
                      last edited by

                      @edsped

                      I was just making a funny remark about the shape.

                      I assume it is shaped that way to fit something else.

                      So what is that "something else"?

                      Thanks.

                      Frederick

                      Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                      jay_s_ukundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jay_s_ukundefined
                        jay_s_uk @fcwilt
                        last edited by

                        @fcwilt the RRF-36 is shaped to mount on the rear of a nema 14

                        Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                        fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • fcwiltundefined
                          fcwilt @jay_s_uk
                          last edited by

                          @jay_s_uk said in Duet3D announces new tool board at FormNext:

                          @fcwilt the RRF-36 is shaped to mount on the rear of a nema 14

                          There must be more to that. A NEMA 14 is square. The RRF-36 is not.

                          Frederick

                          Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                          jay_s_ukundefined A Former User? 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • jay_s_ukundefined
                            jay_s_uk @fcwilt
                            last edited by

                            @fcwilt round nema 14's aren't square... https://www.omc-stepperonline.com/round-nema-14-bipolar-0-9deg-8ncm-11-33oz-in-0-65a-36x20mm-4-wires-14hr08-0654s
                            they're now also the most popular type of motor to use on an extruder

                            Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                            fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • fcwiltundefined
                              fcwilt @jay_s_uk
                              last edited by

                              @jay_s_uk

                              Well now it makes some sense.

                              Thanks.

                              Frederick

                              Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • A Former User?
                                A Former User @fcwilt
                                last edited by

                                @fcwilt Let me guess, back in math class you were the one to yell out Pie aint square, pie are round . Right?

                                fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                • fcwiltundefined
                                  fcwilt @A Former User
                                  last edited by

                                  @KenW

                                  No, not that I recall.

                                  It just seems to me that they made that shape to fit onto/into something else where that particular shape was well suited.

                                  I doubt they picked that shape for artistic reasons.

                                  Frederick

                                  Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                                  A Former User? droftartsundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • A Former User?
                                    A Former User @fcwilt
                                    last edited by

                                    @fcwilt Southern humor does not translate well I take it. The complete version of that one is.
                                    Pie aint square. pie are round, cornbread are square.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • droftartsundefined
                                      droftarts administrators @fcwilt
                                      last edited by

                                      @fcwilt I don't know what the design parameters of the board, but you can guess from these pictures:
                                      alt text alt text
                                      It doesn't fit behind the motor, it fits on the side, but it is the same width and height as the motor and extruder. This picture makes it look big, but that's a NEMA 14 round stepper, it really is tiny and light, even compared to a Hemera. Connections are forward and back, rather than up or down, and the mounting is very specific to the Roto extruder (it has the same spaced mounting holes on the other side of the extruder). Connectors are the standard ones E3D fit to their heaters, fans and thermistors, so they just plug straight in. Only the CAN connector exits from the top. There's a hot end fan on the other side, and I don't know where a part fan would fit on. It looks like the board could have been square, but for the top mounting hole. Probably the first Duet board with rounded corners - someone asked at Formnext why we didn't put rounded edges on our boards, and I pointed them towards @T3P3Tony!

                                      Ian

                                      Bed-slinger - Mini5+ WiFi/1LC | RRP Fisher v1 - D2 WiFi | Polargraph - D2 WiFi | TronXY X5S - 6HC/Roto | CNC router - 6HC | Tractus3D T1250 - D2 Eth

                                      jay_s_ukundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • jay_s_ukundefined
                                        jay_s_uk @droftarts
                                        last edited by

                                        @droftarts and the CAN connector is the same one that's been adopted by Mellow and BTT (XT30 2+2)

                                        Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Surgikillundefined
                                          Surgikill
                                          last edited by

                                          Well, looks like the roto is available for purchase through filastruder. Going to wait to purchase until the documentation is available.

                                          Surgikillundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Surgikillundefined
                                            Surgikill @Surgikill
                                            last edited by Surgikill

                                            Eh, I just found some basic documentation and max ambient printing temp is 40C. Think I'm going to have to pass on this extruder.

                                            o_lampeundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA