Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Vertical lines vs. geared extruders

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Tuning and tweaking
    vertical banding
    26
    89
    9.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Phaedruxundefined
      Phaedrux Moderator @mrehorstdmd
      last edited by

      @mrehorstdmd Looks a bit like STL segmentation to me.

      Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

      Notepadundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • kb58undefined
        kb58
        last edited by kb58

        On my printer, I see faint vertical lines on the sides of a printed test cube, but only in the Y direction, not the X, so suspect printer frame deflection/ringing in the Y axis.

        Are you guys seeing the patterns being discussed irrespective of print direction? If it really is an extruder issue, print direction would not matter. If it does, then frame stiffness may be contributing.

        Scratch-built 350mmx350mm coreXY, linear rails, ballscrews, 3 Z axis, Duet3 6HC, v3.3, Tool Board v1.1, BondTech LGX + Mosquito hot end

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DonStaufferundefined
          DonStauffer @bot
          last edited by

          @bot I replaced the belt even though it was only very slightly frayed.

          The vertical artifact didn't go away, but may have faded some. But the flatness of my walls improved pretty significantly. So I think you're right that belts need to be replaced more frequently than it seems. It really made a difference. Just not the one I was looking for. But it's still good.

          botundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • botundefined
            bot @DonStauffer
            last edited by

            @donstauffer I think I need to try the same thing! Thanks for the feedback.

            *not actually a robot

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Notepadundefined
              Notepad @Phaedrux
              last edited by

              @phaedrux Im unfortunately having that issue on straight walls. so I can confirm its not STL deresolution. honestly pulling my hair out trying to find out why I get vertical lines so blatant on straight walls.

              The real bamboo printer manufacturer

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DonStaufferundefined
                DonStauffer
                last edited by

                This is a first layer, in Hatchbox transparent PETG, printed at 12 mm/sec, showing the vertical artifact. I have now replaced all hot end parts and all movement parts, with the only exception being the linear rails, which are smooth as silk. I have not been able to solve this problem, at all, but I have concluded it is not likely to be a mechanical problem.

                f01739a4-d284-4517-b40d-6fa1dfb3d1ed-image.png

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DonStaufferundefined
                  DonStauffer
                  last edited by

                  Another remarkable example in transparent PETG, printed at about 45 mm/sec:

                  56c92f28-9074-4006-bab2-64f7384e8527-image.png

                  DonStaufferundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DonStaufferundefined
                    DonStauffer @DonStauffer
                    last edited by

                    @donstauffer Artifact.jpg

                    o_lampeundefined droftartsundefined 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • o_lampeundefined
                      o_lampe @DonStauffer
                      last edited by o_lampe

                      @donstauffer
                      those lines are pretty impressive. 😦
                      I can't see what the printdirection was, but I guess it was "left-right"? Otherwise it indicates your nozzle isn't exactly true to the bed and more filament is squished to one side then the other..The cross section would look like a seesaw

                      DonStaufferundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • o_lampeundefined
                        o_lampe @DonStauffer
                        last edited by

                        @donstauffer
                        some math wizard should be able to calculate what part of the equation is synchron with that line distance.
                        We'd need to calculate the amount of extrusion ( layer height, layerwidth, nozzle) and correlate it with the extruder drive train.
                        Is it a wobbling drive gear or a current control issue of the stepper driver or what?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • droftartsundefined
                          droftarts administrators @DonStauffer
                          last edited by

                          @donstauffer I think you have missed out on a large part of this thread. See from here: https://forum.duet3d.com/post/240216
                          Watch these two videos, particularly the second one:
                          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL6u0UwPJOQ
                          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32dTLRNIYmw

                          Print this object and see if you get the 'woodgrain' effect: https://mihaidesigns.com/pages/inconsistent-extrusion-test

                          If you get the woodgrain effect, then you'll know if the issue is the extruder. If the lines line up, it's something in your X and Y movement.

                          If you do get a woodgrain effect, he explains calculating the extrusion distance between artefacts in the second video from about 1:50, which can help pinpoint what's causing the issue. It looks like you have 13 artefacts in 20mm, which is quite a lot shorter than the extruder gear cogging issue, but depends on extrusion width. It may be the extruder motor full step distance, or the extruder gear teeth distance. Maybe post the response to M115 and config.g, too.

                          Ian

                          Bed-slinger - Mini5+ WiFi/1LC | RRP Fisher v1 - D2 WiFi | Polargraph - D2 WiFi | TronXY X5S - 6HC/Roto | CNC router - 6HC | Tractus3D T1250 - D2 Eth

                          DonStaufferundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DonStaufferundefined
                            DonStauffer @o_lampe
                            last edited by

                            @o_lampe I don't really understand. It's symmetrical, so it doesn't matter what the print direction was.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DonStaufferundefined
                              DonStauffer @droftarts
                              last edited by DonStauffer

                              @droftarts No, I didn't miss any of this thread, believe me! And I did watch the videos already. He shows the problem is common, but not how to solve it. Also, my problem isn't wood grain. It's nice neat vertical lines.

                              My conclusion is it can't be extrusion related unless it's firmware or electronics, because the transform from print line to extrusion would be so small. There's nothing that small in the extruder path, not even the ridges in the feed roller of the BMG. So, it's either firmware or electronics (the only way the extrusion could "jiggle" so frequently), or movement.

                              From what I've found out since, others have had this problem with the Railcore and concluded it was from long belts inherent in the CoreXY architecture. But nobody has any speculation why some people find it hard to detect and others, like me, have it BOLD. It does seem to be the case that certain filaments show it better, with transparent being the most.

                              Another conclusion some have drawn is that this is NOT a result of resonance, though resonance may make it worse. Rather, they believe it to be a meshing issue between the teeth of the belt and the pulley. But I can't figure out what exactly that would be, or how to fix it. Possibly the 16-tooth stepper pulleys are too small in diameter, but that doesn't seem too likely.

                              Phaedruxundefined o_lampeundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Phaedruxundefined
                                Phaedrux Moderator @DonStauffer
                                last edited by

                                @donstauffer said in Vertical lines vs. geared extruders:

                                Another conclusion some have drawn is that this is NOT a result of resonance, though resonance may make it worse. Rather, they believe it to be a meshing issue between the teeth of the belt and the pulley. But I can't figure out what exactly that would be, or how to fix it. Possibly the 16-tooth stepper pulleys are too small in diameter, but that doesn't seem too likely.

                                This would be my guess. Possible solutions are to use flat flanged bearings for idlers instead of toothed idlers and flip the belts such that the smooth side rides on the bearing face. This is what I do on my Dbot as I had some pronounced ridges like that originally.

                                Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • oliofundefined
                                  oliof
                                  last edited by

                                  I had strong vertical lines like that with overtensioned belts.

                                  (Speaking of belts, I am currently experimenting with a friction extruder, which is helping with the secondary woodgrain pattern that are the result of the hob teeth on hobbed extruders (both dual and single geared in this case. Copy mode comparison with a BMG from my IDEX imminent).

                                  <>RatRig V-Minion Fly Super5Pro RRF<> V-Core 3.1 IDEX k*****r <> RatRig V-Minion SKR 2 Marlin<>

                                  DonStaufferundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • o_lampeundefined
                                    o_lampe @DonStauffer
                                    last edited by

                                    @donstauffer
                                    I always ruled out resonance, because it would fade out after a few lines. Alas if the source of ringing would be permanent, it would constantly keep it going. Overstretched belts could be it. On a CoreXY it would show different results at different path-angles.
                                    If it's the extruder gears, a change in layerheight would make a difference.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • droftartsundefined
                                      droftarts administrators
                                      last edited by droftarts

                                      @donstauffer Thanks for the reply, it's good to know it's not extrusion related (or at least, that's not obvious!). I did think the 13 artefacts in 20mm made it unlikely to be the extruder effect seen in the videos.

                                      Next question: do you have these artefacts in X and Y directions? On a CoreXY, movements in X move all 8 (or minimum of 8 ) idlers and both motors. Movements in Y move 4 idlers and both motors. Movements diagonally move 6 idlers (4 on the X axis and 2 connected to the moving motor), and that one motor. So if you print an octagonal object, and you only get the artefacts on some faces, you should be able to narrow the problem to specific idlers and/or one motor/pulley.

                                      If you still get artefacts on all faces, I'd look again at your belts, pulleys and toothed idlers, as @Phaedrux suggested. Assuming your pictures show a print in the X or Y direction, and assuming you're using belts with a 2mm tooth pitch, and that your printer is a CoreXY, the 13 artefacts per 20mm means that the belts are actually moving 28mm, so artefacts are about every 1mm.

                                      One explanation could be that your belts are mismatched; there are two Gates belts specification, with Gates USA producing the GT2 and GT3 profiles, while Gates Unitta Asia produce 2GT. I've heard that they are not compatible if you mix them, so make sure you're using pulleys with the same tooth profile as belt tooth profile. The artefacts every 1mm could be the effect of the belt tooth pushing in and then popping out of the pulley, or camming around the pulley (which would also be at half the tooth pitch).

                                      If you could more accurately measure the distance between vertical artefacts than I can from your image (or count how many there are per 10mm), and post your config.g (to show steps per mm etc) that might help narrow down where the problem is.

                                      Ian

                                      Bed-slinger - Mini5+ WiFi/1LC | RRP Fisher v1 - D2 WiFi | Polargraph - D2 WiFi | TronXY X5S - 6HC/Roto | CNC router - 6HC | Tractus3D T1250 - D2 Eth

                                      DonStaufferundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                      • mrehorstdmdundefined
                                        mrehorstdmd
                                        last edited by

                                        There's a screw drive extruder here that looks interesting- a bit large and complex, but might be smoother:
                                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVhw3XlrDuY

                                        https://drmrehorst.blogspot.com/

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • DonStaufferundefined
                                          DonStauffer @oliof
                                          last edited by

                                          @oliof My belts are most definitely not overtensioned. When I loosened them to do the Air Print tensioning, they didn't bounce at all so I stopped and just left them there. I used to have them at about 50Hz, but now they're much looser.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • DonStaufferundefined
                                            DonStauffer @droftarts
                                            last edited by

                                            @droftarts All faces, although less at some angles, and at many angles they become a sort of "interference pattern".

                                            I have replaced all belts and pulleys and idlers with new brand name ones. It makes the artifact look really pristine! But didn't reduce it at all.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA