Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    I present to you my Agony

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    My Duet controlled machine
    9
    13
    1.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • SlimShaderundefined
      SlimShader @matt3o
      last edited by SlimShader

      @matt3o looks like you're getting awesome results! Well done on persevering with it, that pain is now knowledge...for the next one 🙂

      matt3oundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • matt3oundefined
        matt3o @SlimShader
        last edited by

        @slimshader said in I present to you my Agony:

        for the next one

        it's funny because it's true 😞 I'm already thinking of building a very small one...

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • martin7404undefined
          martin7404
          last edited by

          Hi,
          again nice to read about projects.
          Great machine, month ago I was looking at annex cross cartesian while wondering what to build for a project with large ABS parts, in the end built simple core XY with linear rods and triple Z with leadscrews, I end up using Oldham couplers for the motor - leadscrew coupling. But this one looks great
          I remember you from Peopoly forum with the moai battle. We all ended up with LCD printers at the end

          Muldex IDEX Duet2+Duex5
          Custom CoreXY 600x400 Hemera , Duet3+Toolboard+1HCL closed loop
          Sapphire Pro with Duet2, with closed-loop motors
          custom high temp E3D tool changer with Duet2+Duex

          matt3oundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • mrehorstdmdundefined
            mrehorstdmd @matt3o
            last edited by

            @matt3o Great! It looks like you've got the extrusion tuned up nicely!

            https://drmrehorst.blogspot.com/

            fmaundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • fmaundefined
              fma @mrehorstdmd
              last edited by

              That's really a beauty! I started to design a new CoreXY for high temperature printing, but this is too much problems for my needs, so I will build a new 'simple' machine. And why not try a new geometry?

              As I also work with Onshape, this is a good oportunity. I won't build such large machine, 250x250x250 will be enough.

              BTW, is this geometry more rigid than a CoreXY (all things equal)? With 2 carriages at 90° for the tool head, it seems it can handle more lateral efforts. I'm very interested in 5 axis printing, and mounting a tall and heavy head on such geometry is maybe better than on a CoreXY...

              What do you think?

              Frédéric

              fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • fcwiltundefined
                fcwilt @fma
                last edited by

                @fma

                I built a similar but much smaller (200 x 200 x 200) printer.

                I like the motion system a great deal - simple with short belts.

                My prints just fine.

                Frederick

                Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • matt3oundefined
                  matt3o @martin7404
                  last edited by

                  @martin7404 said in I present to you my Agony:

                  I remember you from Peopoly forum with the moai battle

                  we don't talk about that....

                  @fma said in I present to you my Agony:

                  BTW, is this geometry more rigid than a CoreXY (all things equal)? With 2 carriages at 90° for the tool head

                  I find it to be better in every possible way. More precise, sturdier and stronger (let's not forget there are 4 motors for XY).

                  The downside is that 1) you need more components 2) everything needs to be perefectly square 🙂 so a little more time spent assembling it up.

                  If you need to put a lot of weight on the gantry you can use bigger backers for the rails, but of course you are adding weight.

                  fmaundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • fmaundefined
                    fma @matt3o
                    last edited by

                    Thanks for the feedback!

                    Frédéric

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • laelundefined
                      lael @matt3o
                      last edited by

                      @matt3o Which fysetc board did you end up going for?

                      matt3oundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • zaptaundefined
                        zapta @matt3o
                        last edited by

                        @matt3, nice build!

                        Here is an upgrade idea for you (Double Agony) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzf8903FvCs

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • matt3oundefined
                          matt3o @lael
                          last edited by

                          @lael hey sorry for the late reply. the forum didn't notify your reply.

                          They are FYSETC S6 V2.0 today I would probably get a Spider.

                          @zapta OHMYGOD I need it!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA