Leveling the bed...

Phaedrux

Are you actually using F0?

Try this

M558 P9 H5 F100 T6000 A5 R0.3 S0.005 B1
G31 P25

TLeTourneau

@phaedrux said in Leveling the bed...:

Are you actually using F0?

Try this
M558 P9 H5 F100 T6000 A5 R0.3 S0.005 B1
G31 P25

Thanks, I'm giving that a try now. I've also calculated my average Z offset and added it to the G31 so my gcode looks like this now:

M558 P9 H5 F100 T6000 A5 R0.3 S0.005 B1            ; Set Z probe type to bltouch and the dive height + speeds
G31 P25 X-42 Y-4 Z-0.50                            ; Set Z probe trigger value, offset and trigger height

Phaedrux

I'm concerned that your z offset is negative. How did you measure it?

TLeTourneau

@phaedrux said in Leveling the bed...:

I'm concerned that your z offset is negative. How did you measure it?

I had the printer at Z0 and issued a M208 S1 Z-3, I then moved the print head to the center of the bed and placed a small sheet of paper between the hot end and the bed and raised the bed until there was a slight drag on the paper. I then checked the Z reading on the display which was -0.50. I did the same thing for each screw location along with X20:Y165 and X325:Y165. I manually adjusted the levelers until the perimeter and center were all at Z-0.50. I was under the impression that this should be done to account for the trigger height variance. I could possibly adjust the probe mount to compensate for the trigger height variance but I did not want to introduce other variables by messing with the mount.

JoergS5

@tletourneau Maybe you want to consider a different reason for your funny looking printbed heat map: the trapezoid screws which connects the spindles to the frame of the heat bed are not backlash free, so when your stepper changes direction, you will have some error everytime. When you move down, steps are lost by moving the screw from the bottom flank to the upper of the screw. The printer thinks the bed to be lower than it is in reality. You can test it by forcing the bed and screw to be always at the bottom of the spindle by putting some 2 kg weight on the heat bed and testing again. (Generally, the heat bed is always at the bottom by the bed weight, but you have a stiff construction, so spindle-bed-spindle could have some tension and could clamp the screw to remain on top). I measured my spindle backlash to be 0.1 mm.

Phaedrux

@tletourneau It's just that with this probe type it expects the probe to trigger before the nozzle reaches the bed, and a negative value may be converted by the firmware to a positive value anyway.

Furthermore, the BLTouch needs to be mounted with the base of the probe body 8mm above the nozzle tip which should result in a trigger height close to 2mm.

https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Test_and_calibrate_the_Z_probe#Section_Calibrate_the_Z_probe_trigger_height

With such a constrained bed with 6 leveling screws it will be difficult to prevent some warping. Have you tried removing 3 of the screws to allow for a 3 point leveling system?

TLeTourneau

@joergs5 said in Leveling the bed...:

@tletourneau Maybe you want to consider a different reason for your funny looking printbed heat map: the trapezoid screws which connects the spindles to the frame of the heat bed are not backlash free, so when your stepper changes direction, you will have some error everytime. You can test it by forcing the bed and screw to be always at the bottom of the spindle by putting some 2 kg weight on the heat bed and testing again. (Generally, the heat bed is always at the bottom, but you have a stiff construction, so spindle-bed-spindle could have some tension and could clamp the screw to remain on top). I measured my spindle backlash to be 0.1 mm.

Thanks, I'm going to invest in anti-backlash spring loaded nuts to see if that helps. I'm just trying to figure out which ones to order.

I am now getting random Z probe readings not consistent errors. I'm trying to figure that out now.

TLeTourneau

@phaedrux said in Leveling the bed...:

@tletourneau It's just that with this probe type it expects the probe to trigger before the nozzle reaches the bed, and a negative value may be converted by the firmware to a positive value anyway.

Furthermore, the BLTouch needs to be mounted with the base of the probe body 8mm above the nozzle tip which should result in a trigger height close to 2mm.

https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Test_and_calibrate_the_Z_probe#Section_Calibrate_the_Z_probe_trigger_height

With such a constrained bed with 6 leveling screws it will be difficult to prevent some warping. Have you tried removing 3 of the screws to allow for a 3 point leveling system?

I though that I was able to get the sensor mounted per the instructions and it at the correct 8mm offset but I will make a new jig and double check.

Phaedrux

@tletourneau said in Leveling the bed...:

I am now getting random Z probe readings not consistent errors. I'm trying to figure that out now.

The errors were already there (as shown in your height map) they are being reported now because of the M558 A5 S0.005 I had you add. A5 means it will try and probe up to 5 times until it gets two readings that are within 0.005 of the trigger height. If it can't get an agreed value it reports the error.

So something is not right with your probe. Is it a genuine BLTouch or a clone? You can take the pin out by removing the set screw at the top of the probe. Check it for dirt or damage. Clean it with alcohol. reinstall it and try again.

TLeTourneau

@phaedrux It's a genuine Bltouch, I checked the SN on the website when I received it.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07GVCX74T/ref=od_aui_detailpages00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

I'll clean the pin and see if that helps.

I want to thank everyone for the help, I really appreciate it.

JoergS5

@tletourneau Instead of anti backlash screws you can try to loose one of the steppers, so it can self adjust and there is no tension between spindle - bed frame- spindle, but the stepper is not allowed to rotate. Analog to the idea of fixed bearing - loose bearing.

The screw in front on the left seems to be bent, maybe from heating the bed, temperature expansion and this can lead to bed bending also.
The best article I know how to design a heat bed is: https://drmrehorst.blogspot.com/2017/07/ultra-megamax-dominator-3d-printer-bed.html

Phaedrux

Have you actually tried a test print to see how flat the bed actually is?

Something like this is a good way to test.

0_1542493718946_bedlevel_nozzle_0.4_200x200-0.3-0.8.stl

TLeTourneau

@phaedrux not yet, I wanted to get a good bed compensation first but I'll try to do a print. I want to test the new hot end.

I did order a borosilicate plate for it, would this work as an interface between the glass and the bed?

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B06XG4QV1X/ref=crt_ewc_title_dp_2?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=A30U07HIVF5QFE

Phaedrux

The nice part about an actual print is that it takes the probe completely out of the equation and let's you visualize the bed surface without abstraction.

If you use that STL I posted and tweak your slicer settings so that each line is made up of two extrusion lines you'll be able to tell easily where on the bed is too low or two high.

mikebridge

on my tronxy x5s with the same issue (appearing to 'arc up' in the middle of the bed when the bed should be showing a slight sag), it was overtightened screws for the smooth rods on either side of the Z motors, that was enough to pull the y axis 2020 into a sag in the middle.

edit: i should have read the entire thread before responding, seems you already addressed this and have moved on to another issue.

TLeTourneau

@mikebridge said in Leveling the bed...:

on my tronxy x5s with the same issue (appearing to 'arc up' in the middle of the bed when the bed should be showing a slight sag), it was overtightened screws for the smooth rods on either side of the Z motors, that was enough to pull the y axis 2020 into a sag in the middle.

edit: i should have read the entire thread before responding, seems you already addressed this and have moved on to another issue.

I appreciate the reply though! I've determined in the interim that my bed is warped and the most recent mesh map aligns with what my machinist level shows. As I don't necessarily want to replace the bed I have ordered a 330x330x3mm piece of borosilicate glass and a 500x500x0.5mm high temp silicone rubber sheet to put between the bed and the glass. Hopefully that will help with that part.

For the Z probe, I get the consistency errors when I have it set to a sensitivity of between 0.005mm and 0.011mm. It seems fine at 0.012mm. I have cleaned it as recommended with no change and have reached out to the vendor for assistance. Until then 0.012 will have to be sufficient.

I will be running the recommended test print shortly, I'm just trying to figure out how to set Simplify3D so that each line is made up of two extrusion lines.

TLeTourneau

Latest run with the sensitivity set to 0.013mm, it completed at that setting.

TLeTourneau

So I ran the STL and the bed is all over the place. Beyond the sensitivity issues I'm having with the BLTouch my bed is definitely... wavey... I'll see how the borosilicate sheet with the silicone interface works. Although I see the benefit of changing the build platform I want to try the glass first.

Phaedrux

I'm not surprised it's wavy. I asked before, but maybe you missed it, have you tried only using 3 of the 6 bed fasteners? Is the bed plate stiff enough to allow for that? Those 6 bolts are torque the plate every which way. Only 3 points are needed to define a flat plane.

With the bolt pattern like this

1......2......3
.
.
.
4......5......6

I would remove bolts 2, 4, and 6. Then use bolt 1 to set the reference height of Z0 with the nozzle, and then adjust bolts 3 and 5 to meet the nozzle.

This may not be feasible if the plate flexes too much under its own weight, or if the plate itself is truly warped even when not under competing tension from the bolts.

You can verify the repeatability of your probe by redoing the G30 S-1 test several times, manually resetting the probe to just touch the bed and resetting Z0 between each attempt. 0.013 is a lot worse variability than you should be getting with the BLtouch obviously, but I'd still like to know what actual trigger height values you get. Is there any pattern or consistency to it at all? If not, then possibly a bunk probe or something else mechanical going on that's interfering.

TLeTourneau

@phaedrux said in Leveling the bed...:

I'm not surprised it's wavy. I asked before, but maybe you missed it, have you tried only using 3 of the 6 bed fasteners? Is the bed plate stiff enough to allow for that? Those 6 bolts are torque the plate every which way. Only 3 points are needed to define a flat plane.

With the bolt pattern like this
1......2......3
.
.
.
4......5......6
I would remove bolts 2, 4, and 6. Then use bolt 1 to set the reference height of Z0 with the nozzle, and then adjust bolts 3 and 5 to meet the nozzle.

This may not be feasible if the plate flexes too much under its own weight, or if the plate itself is truly warped even when not under competing tension from the bolts.

You can verify the repeatability of your probe by redoing the G30 S-1 test several times, manually resetting the probe to just touch the bed and resetting Z0 between each attempt. 0.013 is a lot worse variability than you should be getting with the BLtouch obviously, but I'd still like to know what actual trigger height values you get. Is there any pattern or consistency to it at all? If not, then possibly a bunk probe or something else mechanical going on that's interfering.

I tried changing the screw layout but the bed had quit a bit of flex in it when I did that.

I have no problem running the G30 S-1 repeatedly but I am not certain how to reset Z0 between each attempt. For some reason my search abilities seem to be lacking today...

Also, although I am not certain, I think the Bltouch issue could be being influenced by a wiring issue, I noticed that when I moved some wires above my hot end the Bltouch went into an error state. I'm going to order some JST SM connectors to see if that helps. I've wanted to do quick connects on the hot end anyway so this may help.

Thanks again for all of your help!