Thanks for the help, it is working now.

Thank you all for your quick and efficient help.
I found the error, it was here:
G10 P0 X0 Y0 Z0 ; set tool 0 axis offsets
It was Z0.6, after an earlier setup and I skipped over it several times. In my case, zero is a good solution.

Hi,
Eduard

Thank you all for your quick and efficient help.
I found the error, it was here:
G10 P0 X0 Y0 Z0 ; set tool 0 axis offsets
It was Z0.6, after an earlier setup and I skipped over it several times. In my case, zero is a good solution.

Hi,
Eduard

@deckingman It is possible to print out the G code while printing like on CNC?

@deckingman Thanks, I'll try and give feedback.

@rjenkinsgb Yes, but you can find here again:

config (1).g
homez (1).g
homeall (1).g
bed.g

@rjenkinsgb When I built it, I measured the backlash using the method you wrote. I have measured it several times since then and get the same value. This is unlikely to be where the problem comes from. Mainly because the bed goes higher (endstop) to the first layer and then comes lower, 0.2mm.

@rjenkinsgb Sure, I don't take personal
If there was a backlash, the motor shaft would move, but the bed would not. However, the motor shaft does not move at the second layer.
I measured the backlash and about 0.01mm (the bed moves on a ball screw)

@eduard
This is what the table leveling process I follow looks like:
The duet is set above 3 points on the bed:
M558 P0; No Z probe
G30 P0 X90 Y0 Z-99999; probe near an adjusting screw
G30 P1 X150 Y185 Z-99999; probe near an adjusting screw
G30 P2 X30 Y185 Z-99999; probe near an adjusting screw and report adjustments needed

At each point, I adjust the duet to Z0 and adjust the head bed distance to 0.2mm with the bed adjustment screw. Then OK and restart the process to check back.
The thickness of the first layer in the slider is set to 0.25mm.

@rjenkinsgb Thank you for your reply.
The nozzle distance from bed was set with a precision 0.2mm metal gauge. The movement of the bed was calibrated with a 0,001mm precison indicator (+-0.015mm)
Mechanical failure is completely ruled out.
All already layers except the second are executed and perfect. When I use raft, the print is perfect and in all directions.

@phaedrux Unfortunately, I no longer remember exactly what was and what wasn’t, but now I’m sending a new one that doesn’t have raft. During yesterday's test, I printed this and the second layer went to the first one here, too, without raft.

xyzCalibration_cube (1).gcode

@eduard unfortunately this was not the problem. At the second layer, the bed still does not move. The third is fine and so on.