Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Need help! G29 mesh bed compensation over compensation

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Tuning and tweaking
    7
    33
    1.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Vetiundefined
      Veti @Jayson
      last edited by

      @Jayson said in Need help! G29 mesh bed compensation over compensation:

      And yes my probe it really 50mm behind and 4.09mm above my nozzle. I just have to make sure that no tool is mounted when I probe.

      can you post a picture of the assembly?

      change the steps like this

      M350 X16 Y16 Z16 I1 ; configure microstepping without interpolation
      M92 X80 Y80 Z900 E420.00:1888.21:420.00:420.00 ; set steps per mm

      However. when converting the numbers back i realized the Z900 is very strange.
      What kind of z setup do you have?
      Common values are 400 (most printers tr8x8)
      800 (sfu1204)
      1600 (tr8x2)

      Jaysonundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Jaysonundefined
        Jayson @Veti
        last edited by

        @Veti I implemented your changes and it solved a few problems. Something was holding back my top speeds and I guess it was an over loaded cpu.

        Trying a test print now.

        The few extra z steps are from a slight gear reduction by a belt from my z stepper to my lead screws

        Thanks a lot for the help. I will post again when the test print is completed

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Jaysonundefined
          Jayson
          last edited by

          IMG_20201113_093229.jpg IMG_20201113_091147.jpg

          here is a picture of what I'm going to refer to as my chuck, without a tool and ready for probing.

          the second picture is with a custom machined water cooled cold end with a v6 and zesty nimble. (still vary much a work in progress)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Jaysonundefined
            Jayson
            last edited by

            still having the problem.... 😢

            this picture is from my most recent test.
            as you can see two are too close and three are too far.IMG_20201113_101604.jpg

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • gloomyandyundefined
              gloomyandy
              last edited by

              Are those the actual locations where the cubes were printed or did you move them?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Vetiundefined
                Veti
                last edited by

                post a picture of your heightmap

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Jaysonundefined
                  Jayson
                  last edited by

                  I kept the same orientation, just moved them in close for the picture

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Jaysonundefined
                    Jayson
                    last edited by

                    I have tried the print with the heat bed off at room temperature to eliminate thermal expansion but still the same result.

                    I have also shimmed the low side of the bet up 3 mm to drastically alter the bed mesh and the prints come out looking the exact same.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Jaysonundefined
                      Jayson
                      last edited by

                      Screenshot (1).png

                      it is a 500x500 bed with a silicone heater and buildtak flex plate.
                      it has a 1/4" T6 6061 aluminum plate that I sheared from a piece of scrap at work. It defiantly has some warp that I am working to physically straighten now.

                      Vetiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Vetiundefined
                        Veti @Jayson
                        last edited by Veti

                        @Jayson said in Need help! G29 mesh bed compensation over compensation:

                        it has a 1/4" T6 6061 aluminum plate that I sheared from a piece of scrap at work.

                        that is not thick enough for a 500x500 build plate. as you can see from the sagging heightmap.
                        see this recent discussion
                        https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/19398/height-map-500mmx500mmx4mm-aluminium-build-plate

                        your testprint is not even good in the center. so you have not dialed in the z trigger height well enouch.
                        adjust with babystepping while printing until you get a good first layer, then adjust the offset with the babystep value.

                        also measure the z probe trigger heigh in each of the corners.
                        i would assume for your build they are different.
                        this can be due different factors.
                        one possibility for your printer with such a large print area is sagging axis due to its own weight, which introduces rotation of the carriage. this causes varying probing offset.

                        one way to compensate for that is use a probe that uses the nozzle like a precision piezo

                        jay_s_ukundefined Jaysonundefined 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jay_s_ukundefined
                          jay_s_uk @Veti
                          last edited by

                          I would suggest moving your z probe to be X0, Y0 and Z0.
                          From there, you can set the tool offsets using G10.
                          It makes working everything out so much easier.
                          You can than use TAMV to calculate the X and Y offsets of each tool in relation to the z probe.
                          That's how I have my toolchanger set up.

                          Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                          Jaysonundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • JamesMundefined
                            JamesM
                            last edited by

                            @Jayson said in Need help! G29 mesh bed compensation over compensation:

                            belt

                            Off the topic of your mesh issue, you should really get rid of those steel core belts on your printer. From the pictures you posted earlier your idlers/pulleys are too small for a steel core belt and will cause you serious grief in the future. I don't know the exact diameter minimum but I would guess you need at a minimum a 20-25mm diameter pulley/idler to use steel core belts.

                            Jaysonundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • Jaysonundefined
                              Jayson @Veti
                              last edited by

                              @Veti I suppose the rest of the world isn't messed up like Saskatchewan Canada were we use metric and imperial measurements so I will just try to keep to metric from now on. the base of my printer is an 840x840x6.5mm aluminum plate with 20x20 extrusions around the perimeter. my bed is 535x535x6.5 hard mounted in the middle of the bed. I am adding jacking bolts between the two plates hoping to dial in the flatness of my bed. I can true the bed to the frame then adjust a lead screw on all four corners of my gantry to be parallel to the bed and let auto mesh handle the restIMG_20201113_130930.jpg . IMG_20201113_132004.jpg

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Jaysonundefined
                                Jayson @jay_s_uk
                                last edited by

                                @jay_s_uk i will have to keep this in mind when i get to that stage of the build

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Jaysonundefined
                                  Jayson @JamesM
                                  last edited by

                                  @JamesM said in Need help! G29 mesh bed compensation over compensation:

                                  @Jayson said in Need help! G29 mesh bed compensation over compensation:

                                  belt

                                  you should really get rid of those steel core belts on your printer.

                                  I went to them to try minimizing stretch over the really long belts and wanted something strong enough to handle high speeds with nema23 steppers. still managed to snap a belt setting up sensor less homing. (gave up on that, not reliable enough for tool changing)
                                  now I have homing switches.

                                  anyway. should have gone with gt2 10mm wide belts instead to get away from steel. might redesign.

                                  Vetiundefined fcwiltundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Vetiundefined
                                    Veti @Jayson
                                    last edited by

                                    @Jayson said in Need help! G29 mesh bed compensation over compensation:

                                    anyway. should have gone with gt2 10mm wide belts instead to get away from steel. might redesign.

                                    the best belts are gates.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • fcwiltundefined
                                      fcwilt @Jayson
                                      last edited by

                                      @Jayson said in Need help! G29 mesh bed compensation over compensation:

                                      anyway. should have gone with gt2 10mm wide belts instead to get away from steel. might redesign.

                                      Have you considered stepping up to 15mm 3GT belts?

                                      Frederick

                                      Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                                      Jaysonundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • Jaysonundefined
                                        Jayson @fcwilt
                                        last edited by Jayson

                                        @fcwilt didn't know they went that wide. my old printer came with 6mm belts so that's just what i got for this.

                                        Vetiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Vetiundefined
                                          Veti @Jayson
                                          last edited by

                                          @Jayson

                                          some suggestions

                                          gate gt2 12mm
                                          https://e3d-online.com/products/gates-powergrip®-2gt-belt-12mm-x-100mm?_pos=5&_sid=9dad4abd8&_ss=r

                                          gt3 up to 15mm (they also sell the pulleys and idlers)
                                          https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32246715230.html

                                          Jaysonundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Jaysonundefined
                                            Jayson @Veti
                                            last edited by

                                            @Veti i can't find a 20T GT2 pully that fits a 12mm belt and a 6.35mm motor shaft. might have to order them for 5mm shafts and take them too the local machine shop.

                                            Vetiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA