Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Combined Smart Effector and tool board for delta printers

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Future Direction
    17
    31
    2.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Edkirkundefined
      Edkirk
      last edited by

      I am a go, I support all of your specifications. Although I am sold on the E3D rapid change nozzles.
      Thanks, Ed

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • o_lampeundefined
        o_lampe @dc42
        last edited by

        @dc42 Since the user has to assemble the kit anyway (crimping wire loom) it would be nice to have both connectors available as option.
        I think everyone re-buildinging a delta with different rod-distance can solder a few connectors?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • achrnundefined
          achrn @dc42
          last edited by

          @dc42 A definite yes please from me (but only for one).

          I'd use Orbiter 2.0 extruder and revo hot end. The proposed spec looks good to me.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • o_lampeundefined
            o_lampe
            last edited by

            Delta-development was on the low burner for a few years. There wasn't much to improve if you use linear rails and magball rods.
            Everyone interested to DIY printers has gone the IDEX or toolchanger route on a CoreXY frame.

            IMHO, it would fuel up the interest for a new Delta effector, if it comes with tool changing options. ("thumb up" if you agree)

            It could be an outer frame with the magballs, which connects to the smartEffector with a twist lock mechanism.
            I have thought about details, how to park the tools (eg. one tool on every tower) but haven't made any drawings yet.
            All wiring had to be done in a way that it doesn't interfere with the magball frame. Same goes for hotend and partcooling fans.
            It would be best if they were placed on the outer frame.

            I don't want to hijack this thread, but if there is enough interest, I start a separate one.

            MaxGyverundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • MaxGyverundefined
              MaxGyver @o_lampe
              last edited by MaxGyver

              With the release of the new Duet 3 Roto Toolboard I am not sure if a new smart effector is really needed. for me the main advantage of the smart effector was nozzle probing. But with the new Scanning Z-Probe Nozzle probing is already obsolete in my opinion. Of course you woul need to set the probe offset manually with a Scanning Z-Probe. To do this I use either a separate button style probe or I adjust the z height manually with baby stepping and run a simple macro to adjust the probe offset by the baby stepping amount and save the new probe offset in config-override.g.

              I would still be interested in buying multiple smart effectors if they support the following points. some of them are obvious but for the sake of completeness...

              • Scanning Z-Probe
              • onboard accelerometer
              • onboard motor driver
              • Io input for filament monitor
              • VZ style hotend mounting holes for Hotends like the Phaetus Rapido, VZ-Revo or Mellow Goliath Hotends.
              • Enough space for direct drive extruders.

              And lastly not necessarily a must but it is nice to have options.

              • A hotend mosfest that can handle <100 W (Mellow Goliath Hotend)

              Since I use CPAP style part cooling and watercooling for the hotend I do not require fanports on the tool board. But I recon This would be a no-go for most users.

              dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • dc42undefined
                dc42 administrators @MaxGyver
                last edited by

                @MaxGyver for delta printers I strongly recommend a nozzle contact probe. The reason is that it is very hard to prevent the effector from tilting slightly as it moves in X and Y; and with an offset Z probe any varying tilt will cause the relative heights of the nozzle and the probe to vary. Therefore, unless we can make the probe coil concentric with the nozzle, we can't use the scanning probe on a delta.

                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                MaxGyverundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • MaxGyverundefined
                  MaxGyver @dc42
                  last edited by MaxGyver

                  @dc42

                  That's a very good point.
                  I am wondering if the effector tilt can be measured and actively compensated by software...but this is probably another topic...

                  Ball spacing of 70mm between the ball centers should be sufficient for a compact direct extruder. It would need to be raised tough in order to clear the hotend collet. I have also tried fitting other hotends like the Voron-Revo and Pheatus Rapido/Goliath. The Voron-Revo does not work, but the Pheatus Rapido/Goliath might just work. The M3 mounting holes just clear the center hole of the effector, but I recon it will mess with the placement of the strain gauges. The threaded E3D-V6 and E3D-Revo Micro support a large range of hotend combinations. Maybe we should stick with those for the sake of simplicity.

                  EDIT: and there is also the option to use an adapter like this

                  E3D Revo-Micro
                  Screenshot 2024-01-14 225726.png

                  Top View of the effektor with a sherpa mini
                  Screenshot 2024-01-14 231601.png

                  Bondtech LGX Lite
                  Screenshot 2024-01-14 231617.png

                  VZ-Hextrudort
                  Screenshot 2024-01-14 231636.png

                  EDIT: The Orbiter 2.0 was missing
                  Screenshot 2024-01-16 184320.png

                  T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • Bipotronicundefined
                    Bipotronic
                    last edited by Bipotronic

                    I'd be interested in an Orbiter V2.0 or Bondtech LGX Lite or Revo Roto version.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • T3P3Tonyundefined
                      T3P3Tony administrators @MaxGyver
                      last edited by

                      @MaxGyver those renders were very helpful. could you do one for the Revo Roto as well?

                      www.duet3d.com

                      MaxGyverundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • MaxGyverundefined
                        MaxGyver @T3P3Tony
                        last edited by

                        @T3P3Tony said in Combined Smart Effector and tool board for delta printers:

                        @MaxGyver those renders were very helpful. could you do one for the Revo Roto as well?

                        Of course, I am happy to!

                        The Revo Roto is a bit longer, so it would have to be rotated by 60°

                        Screenshot 2024-01-16 175416.png
                        Screenshot 2024-01-16 175449.png

                        The setup would be extremely compact.
                        Screenshot 2024-01-16 175720.png

                        I have designed a Delta Printer a while back and was basically waiting for a CAN-Smart effector to emerge. So I took the chance to ckeck for any collision points between extruder the Arms (360mm Haydn Magball Arms).
                        And it looks like the Revo Roto will juuuust fit.

                        Screenshot 2024-01-16 181831.png
                        Screenshot 2024-01-16 181921.png

                        Unfortunately, there is no way to mount the Revo Roto from below trough the effector plate
                        Screenshot 2024-01-16 175825.png

                        Exerqtorundefined o_lampeundefined T3P3Tonyundefined 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • wbrokow1undefined
                          wbrokow1
                          last edited by

                          I would buy an updated effector and new extruder assembly if available.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Exerqtorundefined
                            Exerqtor @MaxGyver
                            last edited by

                            @MaxGyver said in Combined Smart Effector and tool board for delta printers:

                            @T3P3Tony said in Combined Smart Effector and tool board for delta printers:

                            @MaxGyver those renders were very helpful. could you do one for the Revo Roto as well?

                            Of course, I am happy to!

                            The Revo Roto is a bit longer, so it would have to be rotated by 60°

                            Screenshot 2024-01-16 175416.png
                            Screenshot 2024-01-16 175449.png

                            The setup would be extremely compact.
                            Screenshot 2024-01-16 175720.png

                            I have designed a Delta Printer a while back and was basically waiting for a CAN-Smart effector to emerge. So I took the chance to ckeck for any collision points between extruder the Arms (360mm Haydn Magball Arms).
                            And it looks like the Revo Roto will juuuust fit.

                            Screenshot 2024-01-16 181831.png
                            Screenshot 2024-01-16 181921.png

                            Unfortunately, there is no way to mount the Revo Roto from below trough the effector plate
                            Screenshot 2024-01-16 175825.png

                            Wouldn't the tight clearance be solved by rising the balls ever so slightly from the PCB? I mean just 1-2mm would have alot of effect, if it don't play very negstively into the kinematics (I have no experience with Deltas).

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • o_lampeundefined
                              o_lampe @MaxGyver
                              last edited by o_lampe

                              @MaxGyver @T3P3Tony I wonder if the Revo Roto could be placed directly on the PCB?
                              Aren't there any electronic parts or headers?

                              T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • T3P3Tonyundefined
                                T3P3Tony administrators @o_lampe
                                last edited by

                                @o_lampe there will be electronic components and the headers for fans, heaters, the stepper motor etc however we may be able to provide a clear area to allow this sort of mounting, won't know until we start the design. Each extruder will need a different shape and amount of clear area however we may get a lot of overlap. Same with mounting holes. In the end we may need an interface bracket or brackets for all or some extruder options.

                                www.duet3d.com

                                o_lampeundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • T3P3Tonyundefined
                                  T3P3Tony administrators @MaxGyver
                                  last edited by

                                  @MaxGyver said in Combined Smart Effector and tool board for delta printers:

                                  Unfortunately, there is no way to mount the Revo Roto from below trough the effector plate

                                  A couple of L shaped printed brackets would be needed for sure.

                                  www.duet3d.com

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • o_lampeundefined
                                    o_lampe @T3P3Tony
                                    last edited by

                                    @T3P3Tony said in Combined Smart Effector and tool board for delta printers:

                                    In the end we may need an interface bracket or brackets for all or some extruder options.

                                    Right, I thought the same. But in case of a raised Roto it would interfere with the rods?

                                    dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • dc42undefined
                                      dc42 administrators @o_lampe
                                      last edited by

                                      How much would the rod spacing need to be increased to accommodate the Roto without it interfering with the rods, assuming it is mounted on top of the effector as illustrated earlier?

                                      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                      o_lampeundefined MaxGyverundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • apakundefined
                                        apak
                                        last edited by

                                        I would try at least one

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • o_lampeundefined
                                          o_lampe @dc42
                                          last edited by o_lampe

                                          @dc42 My observation was, that the roto's big footprint in @MaxGyver 's illustration was directly on the pcb.
                                          It depends on the height of the components how much the roto would have to be raised.
                                          Other DD-extruders like the hextrudort or sherpa mini have a much smaller footprint. I'd suggest to mount them in the same direction as the roto: with the stepper motor between the rods.

                                          A dumb question: with the accelerator chip on the effector, would it be possible to compensate tilt during probing? If so, it wouldn't have to be a nozzle touch probe, but could be any other.
                                          The math for tilt compensation would be easy. You have the offset between probe and effector-center and you can read the tilt-changes between first homing and when the effector reaches the given probing coords.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • nikschaundefined
                                            nikscha
                                            last edited by

                                            I would be interested in a variant for the Roto.

                                            Stay in school

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA