Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Software bundle 3.4.0 stable released!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Firmware installation
    24
    52
    5.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jay_s_ukundefined
      jay_s_uk @zapta
      last edited by

      @zapta only the motion one is SBC only

      Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Mike3Dundefined
        Mike3D
        last edited by

        Thanks for this update.
        I can see the thumbnails on the pc using webcontrol.
        But i see no thumbnails on the PanelDue.
        On the PanelDeu is the latest firmware 3.4.1-pre2.
        The slicer i have is Prusaslicer and thumbnails are 160x160.

        jjudeundefined dc42undefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jjudeundefined
          jjude @Mike3D
          last edited by

          @mike3d note: PanelDue can only use QOI format. PrusaSlicer 2.4.1 not creating yet QOI.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • dc42undefined
            dc42 administrators @Mike3D
            last edited by dc42

            @mike3d you can get Windows and Mac binaries of a fork of Prusa Slicer that supports QOI format from https://github.com/n8bot/PrusaSlicer/releases/tag/version_2.5.0-alpha0%2Bn8-release1. This version also has the option to retrieve the machine parameters from the Duet via http, if you have configured it for upload via http. Thanks to user @bot for implementing all of this.

            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

            bbergerundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
            • chrishammundefined
              chrishamm administrators @fractalengineer
              last edited by

              @fractalengineer Have a look at the DSF upgrade notes for v3.3, it sounds like you missed them.

              Duet software engineer

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • bbergerundefined
                bberger @dc42
                last edited by

                @dc42 said in Software bundle 3.4.0 stable released!:

                @mike3d you can get Windows and Mac binaries of a fork of Prusa Slicer that supports QOI format from https://github.com/n8bot/PrusaSlicer/releases/tag/version_2.5.0-alpha0%2Bn8-release1. This version also has the option to retrieve the machine parameters from the Duet via http, if you have configured it for upload via http. Thanks to user @bot for implementing all of this.

                This is big news. Especially on the Duet integration part.

                botundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • zaptaundefined
                  zapta
                  last edited by

                  Thanks @chrishamm, I was able to install the external input shaping plugin. Next will figure out how to use it.

                  BTW, if most of the external plugins are not DSF specific, maybe remove DSF from their path on github?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • botundefined
                    bot @bberger
                    last edited by

                    @bberger I have submitted a Pull Request to PrusaSlicer to include those integrations: https://github.com/prusa3d/PrusaSlicer/pull/8087

                    n8bot opened this pull request in prusa3d/PrusaSlicer

                    open Fix RRF Time Estimates and Add "Get Machine Limits" button for Duet printer hosts #8087

                    *not actually a robot

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
                    • ctilley79undefined
                      ctilley79
                      last edited by

                      Is there a roadmap for RRF 3.5 available? What will be its focus?

                      oliofundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • oliofundefined
                        oliof @ctilley79
                        last edited by

                        @ctilley79 Looking at the Github commit history, independent gcode streams seems to be the main feature being developed right now.

                        <>RatRig V-Minion Fly Super5Pro RRF<> V-Core 3.1 IDEX k*****r <> RatRig V-Minion SKR 2 Marlin<>

                        ctilley79undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • StevenLundefined
                          StevenL
                          last edited by

                          Failed up to Upgrade from 3.2.2 to 3.4.0

                          Wifi card is stuck in Starting mode. no actual IP working.
                          Help!

                          Do I need to revert back to 3.2.2 or reset back to factory or what?
                          Please advise

                          Phaedruxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Phaedruxundefined
                            Phaedrux Moderator @StevenL
                            last edited by

                            @stevenl said in Software bundle 3.4.0 stable released!:

                            Failed up to Upgrade from 3.2.2 to 3.4.0

                            Wifi card is stuck in Starting mode. no actual IP working.
                            Help!

                            Do I need to revert back to 3.2.2 or reset back to factory or what?
                            Please advise

                            You may need to reflash the wifi module. Try sending M997 S1 from the USB terminal.

                            Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ctilley79undefined
                              ctilley79 @oliof
                              last edited by

                              @oliof I was hoping they would continue to work on input shaper implementation because I believe it still lags behind Klipper.

                              dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • dc42undefined
                                dc42 administrators @ctilley79
                                last edited by

                                @ctilley79 said in Software bundle 3.4.0 stable released!:

                                @oliof I was hoping they would continue to work on input shaper implementation because I believe it still lags behind Klipper.

                                In what way? We are continuing work on the IS plugin to make it easier to use accelerometer data to tune IS.

                                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Argoundefined
                                  Argo @dc42
                                  last edited by

                                  @dc42

                                  Differences I see compared to Klipper right now:

                                  • separate shaper frequency for each axis

                                  • automatic resonance testing (with a accelerometer): Klipper firmware generates vibrations from lower to higher frequencies and tests each shaper for it‘s effectiveness at each frequency. The results and recommendations are then displayed in a graph. It also recommends maximum acceleration values.
                                    Example:

                                  721e564d-2a11-405f-a5e4-4aaa59d925df-image.png https://www.klipper3d.org/img/calibrate-y.png

                                  dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                  • dc42undefined
                                    dc42 administrators @Argo
                                    last edited by

                                    @argo separate shaper per axis is not only unnecessary (because the supported shapers cover frequency ranges of up to 3:1), it is a bad idea because if you use different shape on different axes then the motion of the axes will no longer be synchronised during acceleration and deceleration. This will result in print artefacts, for example on corners that are not aligned with the axes.

                                    I already said that we are continuing work on the input shaping plugin to make tuning IS easier.

                                    Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                    Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                    http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                    zaptaundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
                                    • zaptaundefined
                                      zapta @dc42
                                      last edited by

                                      @dc42 said in Software bundle 3.4.0 stable released!:

                                      it is a bad idea because if you use different shape on different axes then the motion of the axes will no longer be synchronised

                                      How about a single input shaping that is direction dependent? That is, some interpolation for angles between X only and Y only?

                                      (I don't know how input shaping works, just thinking loud).

                                      chrishammundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • chrishammundefined
                                        chrishamm administrators @zapta
                                        last edited by

                                        @zapta Applying two different input shapers on two axes has certain downsides so we decided it would be better to support only a single input shaper for two axes to damp both ringing frequencies.

                                        We have a first beta of a new input shaping plugin ready but we need to discuss a few more details internally before we eventually release it. I expect we'll publish it sometime this week.

                                        Duet software engineer

                                        samlogan87undefined zaptaundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                        • samlogan87undefined
                                          samlogan87 @chrishamm
                                          last edited by

                                          @chrishamm looking forward to this

                                          Custom Core-XY

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • zaptaundefined
                                            zapta @chrishamm
                                            last edited by

                                            @chrishamm said in Software bundle 3.4.0 stable released!:

                                            Applying two different input shapers on two axes has certain downsides

                                            I was thinking about a single input shaper but in direction of movement rather than direction of axises. Here is an example, let's say that you want to optimize a 45deg movement in a cartesian printer. You run the input shaping calibration process with moves in 45deg, analyze to determine frequencies and IS parameters, and then when you move in 45%, you use that input shaper. Now imagine that you test IS for direction in 45deg increment and when you move for example in direction of 50deg, you use some interpolation to determine the input shaping in that direction.

                                            (I must say that I don't know how input shaping works but my understanding that it's some kind of modulation of the movement which can be applied for movements in any directions)

                                            Does this make sense?

                                            dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA