• Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login
Duet3D Logo Duet3D
  • Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login

Software bundle 3.4.0 stable released!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
Firmware installation
24
52
5.8k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • undefined
    jay_s_uk @zapta
    last edited by 17 Mar 2022, 18:19

    @zapta only the motion one is SBC only

    Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • undefined
      Mike3D
      last edited by 17 Mar 2022, 18:22

      Thanks for this update.
      I can see the thumbnails on the pc using webcontrol.
      But i see no thumbnails on the PanelDue.
      On the PanelDeu is the latest firmware 3.4.1-pre2.
      The slicer i have is Prusaslicer and thumbnails are 160x160.

      undefined undefined 2 Replies Last reply 17 Mar 2022, 19:30 Reply Quote 0
      • undefined
        jjude @Mike3D
        last edited by 17 Mar 2022, 19:30

        @mike3d note: PanelDue can only use QOI format. PrusaSlicer 2.4.1 not creating yet QOI.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • undefined
          dc42 administrators @Mike3D
          last edited by dc42 17 Mar 2022, 19:47

          @mike3d you can get Windows and Mac binaries of a fork of Prusa Slicer that supports QOI format from https://github.com/n8bot/PrusaSlicer/releases/tag/version_2.5.0-alpha0%2Bn8-release1. This version also has the option to retrieve the machine parameters from the Duet via http, if you have configured it for upload via http. Thanks to user @bot for implementing all of this.

          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

          undefined 1 Reply Last reply 18 Mar 2022, 00:02 Reply Quote 3
          • undefined
            chrishamm administrators @fractalengineer
            last edited by 17 Mar 2022, 20:56

            @fractalengineer Have a look at the DSF upgrade notes for v3.3, it sounds like you missed them.

            Duet software engineer

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • undefined
              bberger @dc42
              last edited by 18 Mar 2022, 00:02

              @dc42 said in Software bundle 3.4.0 stable released!:

              @mike3d you can get Windows and Mac binaries of a fork of Prusa Slicer that supports QOI format from https://github.com/n8bot/PrusaSlicer/releases/tag/version_2.5.0-alpha0%2Bn8-release1. This version also has the option to retrieve the machine parameters from the Duet via http, if you have configured it for upload via http. Thanks to user @bot for implementing all of this.

              This is big news. Especially on the Duet integration part.

              undefined 1 Reply Last reply 18 Mar 2022, 03:59 Reply Quote 0
              • undefined
                zapta
                last edited by 18 Mar 2022, 02:18

                Thanks @chrishamm, I was able to install the external input shaping plugin. Next will figure out how to use it.

                BTW, if most of the external plugins are not DSF specific, maybe remove DSF from their path on github?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • undefined
                  bot @bberger
                  last edited by 18 Mar 2022, 03:59

                  @bberger I have submitted a Pull Request to PrusaSlicer to include those integrations: https://github.com/prusa3d/PrusaSlicer/pull/8087

                  n8bot opened this pull request 18 Mar 2022, 03:16 in prusa3d/PrusaSlicer

                  open Fix RRF Time Estimates and Add "Get Machine Limits" button for Duet printer hosts #8087

                  *not actually a robot

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
                  • undefined
                    ctilley79
                    last edited by 22 Mar 2022, 14:31

                    Is there a roadmap for RRF 3.5 available? What will be its focus?

                    undefined 1 Reply Last reply 24 Mar 2022, 22:18 Reply Quote 1
                    • undefined
                      oliof @ctilley79
                      last edited by 24 Mar 2022, 22:18

                      @ctilley79 Looking at the Github commit history, independent gcode streams seems to be the main feature being developed right now.

                      <>RatRig V-Minion Fly Super5Pro RRF<> V-Core 3.1 IDEX k*****r <> RatRig V-Minion SKR 2 Marlin<>

                      undefined 1 Reply Last reply 26 Mar 2022, 16:53 Reply Quote 0
                      • undefined
                        StevenL
                        last edited by 25 Mar 2022, 01:53

                        Failed up to Upgrade from 3.2.2 to 3.4.0

                        Wifi card is stuck in Starting mode. no actual IP working.
                        Help!

                        Do I need to revert back to 3.2.2 or reset back to factory or what?
                        Please advise

                        undefined 1 Reply Last reply 25 Mar 2022, 04:02 Reply Quote 0
                        • undefined
                          Phaedrux Moderator @StevenL
                          last edited by 25 Mar 2022, 04:02

                          @stevenl said in Software bundle 3.4.0 stable released!:

                          Failed up to Upgrade from 3.2.2 to 3.4.0

                          Wifi card is stuck in Starting mode. no actual IP working.
                          Help!

                          Do I need to revert back to 3.2.2 or reset back to factory or what?
                          Please advise

                          You may need to reflash the wifi module. Try sending M997 S1 from the USB terminal.

                          Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • undefined
                            ctilley79 @oliof
                            last edited by 26 Mar 2022, 16:53

                            @oliof I was hoping they would continue to work on input shaper implementation because I believe it still lags behind Klipper.

                            undefined 1 Reply Last reply 26 Mar 2022, 17:54 Reply Quote 0
                            • undefined
                              dc42 administrators @ctilley79
                              last edited by 26 Mar 2022, 17:54

                              @ctilley79 said in Software bundle 3.4.0 stable released!:

                              @oliof I was hoping they would continue to work on input shaper implementation because I believe it still lags behind Klipper.

                              In what way? We are continuing work on the IS plugin to make it easier to use accelerometer data to tune IS.

                              Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                              Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                              http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                              undefined 1 Reply Last reply 26 Mar 2022, 21:20 Reply Quote 0
                              • undefined
                                Argo @dc42
                                last edited by 26 Mar 2022, 21:20

                                @dc42

                                Differences I see compared to Klipper right now:

                                • separate shaper frequency for each axis

                                • automatic resonance testing (with a accelerometer): Klipper firmware generates vibrations from lower to higher frequencies and tests each shaper for it‘s effectiveness at each frequency. The results and recommendations are then displayed in a graph. It also recommends maximum acceleration values.
                                  Example:

                                721e564d-2a11-405f-a5e4-4aaa59d925df-image.png https://www.klipper3d.org/img/calibrate-y.png

                                undefined 1 Reply Last reply 27 Mar 2022, 06:56 Reply Quote 3
                                • undefined
                                  dc42 administrators @Argo
                                  last edited by 27 Mar 2022, 06:56

                                  @argo separate shaper per axis is not only unnecessary (because the supported shapers cover frequency ranges of up to 3:1), it is a bad idea because if you use different shape on different axes then the motion of the axes will no longer be synchronised during acceleration and deceleration. This will result in print artefacts, for example on corners that are not aligned with the axes.

                                  I already said that we are continuing work on the input shaping plugin to make tuning IS easier.

                                  Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                  Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                  http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                  undefined 1 Reply Last reply 27 Mar 2022, 15:41 Reply Quote 6
                                  • undefined
                                    zapta @dc42
                                    last edited by 27 Mar 2022, 15:41

                                    @dc42 said in Software bundle 3.4.0 stable released!:

                                    it is a bad idea because if you use different shape on different axes then the motion of the axes will no longer be synchronised

                                    How about a single input shaping that is direction dependent? That is, some interpolation for angles between X only and Y only?

                                    (I don't know how input shaping works, just thinking loud).

                                    undefined 1 Reply Last reply 28 Mar 2022, 20:04 Reply Quote 0
                                    • undefined
                                      chrishamm administrators @zapta
                                      last edited by 28 Mar 2022, 20:04

                                      @zapta Applying two different input shapers on two axes has certain downsides so we decided it would be better to support only a single input shaper for two axes to damp both ringing frequencies.

                                      We have a first beta of a new input shaping plugin ready but we need to discuss a few more details internally before we eventually release it. I expect we'll publish it sometime this week.

                                      Duet software engineer

                                      undefined undefined 2 Replies Last reply 28 Mar 2022, 20:43 Reply Quote 2
                                      • undefined
                                        samlogan87 @chrishamm
                                        last edited by 28 Mar 2022, 20:43

                                        @chrishamm looking forward to this

                                        Custom Core-XY

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • undefined
                                          zapta @chrishamm
                                          last edited by 29 Mar 2022, 02:20

                                          @chrishamm said in Software bundle 3.4.0 stable released!:

                                          Applying two different input shapers on two axes has certain downsides

                                          I was thinking about a single input shaper but in direction of movement rather than direction of axises. Here is an example, let's say that you want to optimize a 45deg movement in a cartesian printer. You run the input shaping calibration process with moves in 45deg, analyze to determine frequencies and IS parameters, and then when you move in 45%, you use that input shaper. Now imagine that you test IS for direction in 45deg increment and when you move for example in direction of 50deg, you use some interpolation to determine the input shaping in that direction.

                                          (I must say that I don't know how input shaping works but my understanding that it's some kind of modulation of the movement which can be applied for movements in any directions)

                                          Does this make sense?

                                          undefined 1 Reply Last reply 29 Mar 2022, 10:12 Reply Quote 0
                                          20 out of 52
                                          • First post
                                            20/52
                                            Last post
                                          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA