Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    RRF 3.4 input shaping preview available

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Beta Firmware
    25
    205
    25.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • dc42undefined
      dc42 administrators @skrotz
      last edited by

      @skrotz thanks for that, it shows clearly some step errors on the extruder drive and that PA was not involved. I will investigate.

      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • CR3Dundefined
        CR3D @dc42
        last edited by

        @dc42

        I ment this part here:

        "if you use different frequencies per axis, the axes will move out of step. But the amount of out-of-step movement may be small enough to be acceptable, especially if the accelerations are low. It makes no difference whether the same or different input shapers are used per axis."

        I think it is absolutely necessery and with klipper it also works...

        Just for information 🙂 We want the same perfect shaper here in RRF 🙂

        Christian from CR-3D
        Homepage:
        www.cr-3d.de

        Facebook:
        https://www.facebook.com/cr3d.official

        Our Discord Server
        https://discord.gg/SxRaPNuRdA

        Thingiverse Profile:
        https://www.thingiverse.com/cr-3d_official/about

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • psychotik2k3undefined
          psychotik2k3
          last edited by

          i really think that at least different frequencies should be possible because i really don't see how the frequency should be the same on X and Y as the weight in movement is not the same at all, and thus the moment.

          oliofundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • oliofundefined
            oliof @psychotik2k3
            last edited by

            @psychotik2k3 could still be that the frequencies are close enough that the wider band from one configuration is enough to improve both X and Y

            <>RatRig V-Minion Fly Super5Pro RRF<> V-Core 3.1 IDEX k*****r <> RatRig V-Minion SKR 2 Marlin<>

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • Dudek23undefined
              Dudek23 @dc42
              last edited by

              @dc42 This is exactly what happens in Klipper at high smoothing values. In recent versions, during the calibration procedure, the software gives the recommended acceleration values ​​so that the loss of accuracy is not noticeable. I think it is definitely worth testing how it will look in rrf, even for duet3 only, maybe the loss of accuracy will be acceptable.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • dc42undefined
                dc42 administrators @skrotz
                last edited by

                @skrotz said in RRF 3.4 input shaping preview available:

                @dc42 I was able to do a print and captured some stepper errors with debug output. Included is my config.g, the gcode I was printing, and the output logs. Hopefully this helps diagnose the issues some of us are having with RRF 3.4. This was with PA disabled , and input shaping enabled via M593 P"ei2" F41 S0.10

                config.g
                printOutput.txt
                CFFFP_xyzCalibration_cube_205.gcode

                With your files I was able to identify and reproduce the problem. It is now fixed and I can run your test print using your configuration without errors.

                We will release a new beta with input shaping within the next few days.

                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                skrotzundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • skrotzundefined
                  skrotz @dc42
                  last edited by

                  @dc42 great! More than happy to test out a pre-release version of it if you put it on the dropbox 🙂

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • dc42undefined
                    dc42 administrators
                    last edited by

                    @skrotz said in RRF 3.4 input shaping preview available:

                    @dc42 great! More than happy to test out a pre-release version of it if you put it on the dropbox 🙂

                    I've just put the Duet 2 version at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ja08b7qdzsl8kjc/AAAwUbkN2XJvurq5CuQTgx5Wa?dl=0. Please try it with care, this doesn't just contain a bug fix for that issue, the units used internally to measure speeds and accelerations have changed. It works OK so far on my delta, but I haven't tried it on a Cartesian or CoreXY machine yet.

                    Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                    Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                    http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                    skrotzundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • skrotzundefined
                      skrotz @dc42
                      last edited by

                      @dc42 I installed the new firmware, did some basic homing and movement tests, and all seemed fine, so I went for broke and printed out the calibration cube with both input shaping and pressure advance enabled.. no clunking issues or anything that seemed amiss during the print. However, I still have some extrusion zits (in the same places as before, seems caused by input shaping) and the print looked extremely similar to a non PA enabled print, with slightly bulging corners. M122 after showed no errors but 2 hiccups.

                      == Move ===
                      DMs created 83, segments created 33, maxWait 125385ms, bed compensation in use: mesh, comp offset 0.000
                      === MainDDARing ===
                      Scheduled moves 11545, completed moves 11545, hiccups 2, stepErrors 0, LaErrors 0, Underruns [0, 0, 0], CDDA state -1
                      === AuxDDARing ===
                      Scheduled moves 0, completed moves 0, hiccups 0, stepErrors 0, LaErrors 0, Underruns [0, 0, 0], CDDA state -1

                      dc42undefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • dc42undefined
                        dc42 administrators @skrotz
                        last edited by

                        @skrotz thanks for your fast feedback! It has prompted me to check the balance between axis movement and extrusion again, and I have found an issue that may explain those symptoms. More soon.

                        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • dc42undefined
                          dc42 administrators @skrotz
                          last edited by

                          @skrotz I have updated the binary at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ja08b7qdzsl8kjc/AAAwUbkN2XJvurq5CuQTgx5Wa?dl=0 to fix the extrusion issue that I identified.

                          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                          Adrian52undefined skrotzundefined 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Adrian52undefined
                            Adrian52 @dc42
                            last edited by

                            @dc42 just done calibration cubes, with no extruder problems and no hics or step errors, but appears that pa is not working for me with the latest 3.4

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • skrotzundefined
                              skrotz @dc42
                              last edited by skrotz

                              @dc42 Unfortunately things look pretty much the same for me with the newest code. Some small extrusion zits or bubbles on the print, and PA doesn't seem like it is working. I did get a few step errors also it looks like, printing out a calibration cube:

                              === Move ===
                              DMs created 83, segments created 35, maxWait 140417ms, bed compensation in use: mesh, comp offset 0.000
                              === MainDDARing ===
                              Scheduled moves 11545, completed moves 11545, hiccups 2, stepErrors 3, LaErrors 0, Underruns [0, 0, 0], CDDA state -1
                              === AuxDDARing ===
                              Scheduled moves 0, completed moves 0, hiccups 0, stepErrors 0, LaErrors 0, Underruns [0, 0, 0], CDDA state -1

                              Things didn't seem or sound better or worse than previously. There are a couple of clunks I've heard during the prints I did on this firmware and the previous one.. I wasn't sure but now that I've done another print I'm fairly certain towards the end of the print in a couple of spots there was a distinct "clunk" noise, at the same place in both prints.

                              I will see if I can capture step error data again with this new firmware.

                              dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • dc42undefined
                                dc42 administrators @skrotz
                                last edited by dc42

                                @skrotz and @Adrian52 please send M115 and report the firmware date/time that it reports.

                                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                skrotzundefined Adrian52undefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • skrotzundefined
                                  skrotz @dc42
                                  last edited by

                                  @dc42
                                  M115
                                  FIRMWARE_NAME: RepRapFirmware for Duet 2 WiFi/Ethernet FIRMWARE_VERSION: 3.4.0beta2-inputshaping ELECTRONICS: Duet WiFi 1.02 or later + DueX5 FIRMWARE_DATE: 2021-07-25 09:41:53

                                  Will try and capture step error data now.

                                  dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • Adrian52undefined
                                    Adrian52 @dc42
                                    last edited by

                                    @dc42 2021-07-25 09:41:53

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • skrotzundefined
                                      skrotz @dc42
                                      last edited by

                                      @dc42 here's the log data with some stepper errors:

                                      0725printerlog.txt
                                      config.g
                                      CFFFP_xyzCalibration_cube_205.gcode

                                      on closer inspection the "zits" I'm seeing don't seem related to where the stepper errors occurred. They only seem to happen on the X side of the cube, at occasional points where it is changing direction for the X indented in the cube. It looks like overextrusion as it is a small blob. You have to magnify things to be able to see them, but it's happening a fair bit and is different/worse than RRF 3.3 which looks very clean. It seems to happen in exactly the same place each print, and has been pretty consistent throughout all the various 3.4s I've tried.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • sebkritikelundefined
                                        sebkritikel
                                        last edited by

                                        Just ran a print off the lasted BIN

                                        M115
                                        FIRMWARE_NAME: RepRapFirmware for Duet 2 WiFi/Ethernet FIRMWARE_VERSION: 3.4.0beta2-inputshaping ELECTRONICS: Duet WiFi 1.02 or later + DueX5 FIRMWARE_DATE: 2021-07-25 09:41:53
                                        

                                        Parts look great, but end of print M122 reports 65 hiccups and 1929 stepErrors

                                        M593 P"zvdd" F38.4
                                        M572 D0 S0.020

                                        config(1).g
                                        LOG JP_smallPart1^2021 rifle gps mount-Split1.txt
                                        Print file

                                        Large(ish?) IDEX - 6HC, 1HCL
                                        Stratasys Dimension 1200es to 6HC Conversion

                                        dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • dc42undefined
                                          dc42 administrators @skrotz
                                          last edited by

                                          @skrotz what PA did you use when you had those step errors? Was everything apart from PA the same as in the config.g file you posted earlier?

                                          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                          skrotzundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • dc42undefined
                                            dc42 administrators @sebkritikel
                                            last edited by

                                            @sebkritikel thanks, I will run that print on my bench setup.

                                            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA