• Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login
Duet3D Logo Duet3D
  • Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login

Best lead screw - ball bearing mount system

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
3D Printing General Chat
13
42
5.2k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • undefined
    deckingman
    last edited by 30 May 2019, 11:32

    I'd just add that if there is any misalignment of the linear guides or, any other inaccuracy that can cause the Z axis to bind or stick a bit, then those couplings can wind up like a spring and absorb some of the linear movement. Then when there is enough tension, they can let go and give bit extra movement. The net result being uneven layer heights. Hence my personal opinion is to ditch them (or use a universal joint or Oldham coupling if you really have to use something).

    Ian
    https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
    https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
    • undefined
      Edgars Batna
      last edited by Edgars Batna 30 May 2019, 17:08

      What @deckingman said. You need completely straight lead screws and they should be attached to the frame without potential for movement. If there's any chance the bed can move on its own without input from the motor, then so it will and layers will be uneven.

      I'd think that heavier beds are more prone to problems with flexible couplings. I tried various "self aligning" "hassle-free" couplings and they all were just randomizing the error.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • undefined
        sinned6915
        last edited by 30 May 2019, 17:40

        There are a few printers that have similar motion systems. The one that comes to mind is Herculien and Eustathios. They use a pair of ball bearings to support the screw through a bearing holder and the pulley is grub screwed to the screw, and stop collar to keep the whole mess together. Bearing holder also supports the 10mm shaft. Same block for ball screws and TR8 screws.

        https://i.imgur.com/BfKQMK1.png

        Hope this screen grab makes sense. The plastic part bolts up to the underside of an 202o extrusion. The top and bottom bore accepts the 608zz bearings, and the pulley goes on the to and acts as a stop collar.

        If you go here https://github.com/eclsnowman/Eustathios-Spider-V2

        and navigate to the STL's, you can preview the part.

        Eustathios-Spider-V2/STL Print FIles/Z_Axis_Leadscrew_Support_V2 (With Tensioner Config_hold downs and diaphragms).STL

        The one thing I do not like about any of the designs is that the bearing in whatever form will have to support axial thrust loads. Deep groove ball bearings are crap for thrust loads. Proper design would be to use a pair of angular contact bearings that bear on a shoulder, but those are $$$

        I added a ball thrust bearing and I think it made a difference. It is big enough to bear on the outer race and support the pulley above.

        https://www.mcmaster.com/6655k54

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • undefined
          Veti
          last edited by 30 May 2019, 19:22

          what about sfu1204. you would not need the coupler.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • undefined
            DocTrucker
            last edited by 30 May 2019, 20:32

            Is the pulley for belt reduction or tying the three lead screws to one stepper?

            If the former I would recommend worm reduction drive instead to reduce the chance of the elevator driving itself down under it's own weight. I was going to look into breaks for my belt reduction system but someone rightly pointed out worm reduction was potentially a better option.

            Running 3 P3Steel with Duet 2. Duet 3 on the shelf looking for a suitable machine. One first generation Duet in a Logo/Turtle style robot!

            undefined undefined 2 Replies Last reply 30 May 2019, 20:57 Reply Quote 0
            • undefined
              deckingman @DocTrucker
              last edited by 30 May 2019, 20:57

              @doctrucker From other posts, I think he was gunning for a continuous belt/single motor (but I could be wrong).

              The simplest way to prevent the weight of the bed from driving the screws is to use a finer lead screws with correspondingly shallower helix angles.

              Worm drives are OK (ish) - the problem is eliminating backlash. If you have a sufficiently heavy bed and a very steep helix angle on the thread (very course lead), then gravity will take care of any backlash, but finer lead screws are all together a simpler and (IMO) more elegant solution.

              Ian
              https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
              https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • undefined
                Phaedrux Moderator @DocTrucker
                last edited by 30 May 2019, 22:01

                @doctrucker said in Best lead screw - ball bearing mount system:

                Is the pulley for belt reduction or tying the three lead screws to one stepper?

                If the former I would recommend worm reduction drive instead to reduce the chance of the elevator driving itself down under it's own weight. I was going to look into breaks for my belt reduction system but someone rightly pointed out worm reduction was potentially a better option.

                I think his lead screws are 2mm pitch/lead single start, so shouldn't have much auto rotation potential.

                Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • undefined
                  Stephen6309
                  last edited by 31 May 2019, 01:13

                  On my corexy using makerslide. I have only a 608 bearing and the pulley keeping the tr8-8 in place with gravity. One belt runs the two leadscrews from the stepper motor at 2:1. The bed will move down if I press hard down on it, otherwise it doesn't move.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • undefined
                    gnydick
                    last edited by 31 May 2019, 02:58

                    If your bed is mounted rigidly and can't move in X or Y, then the lead screw really doesn't have to be all that good. I use a floating lead screw nut because lead screws aren't perfect, but the linear rails that my bed is mounted to is precise. I've seen ZERO artifacts from the float.

                    undefined 1 Reply Last reply 31 May 2019, 06:46 Reply Quote 0
                    • undefined
                      deckingman @gnydick
                      last edited by 31 May 2019, 06:46

                      @gnydick I'll second that. Lead screws should only provide lift, guides should only guide. I had a bit of an accident a few months ago and bent one of the lead screws. I've never got around to straightening or replacing it because it prints perfectly. The screw might wobble a bit, but one rotation still gives me exactly 1mm of linear movement.

                      Ian
                      https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                      https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                      undefined 1 Reply Last reply 1 Jun 2019, 01:26 Reply Quote 0
                      • undefined
                        gnydick @deckingman
                        last edited by 1 Jun 2019, 01:26

                        @deckingman I had the exact same thing happen!!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • undefined
                          claustro
                          last edited by 1 Jun 2019, 13:39

                          Thank you for all your suggestions.
                          This is what come out .
                          I moved the thrust bearing on the top so it can discharge the weight of the bed on the plastic structure.
                          Below I installed the ball bearing that doesn't have to manage weight.
                          I am still waiting for the rigid coupler.

                          what do you think
                          ?
                          2_1559396358318_20190601_151644 (Piccola).jpg 1_1559396358318_20190601_151656 (Piccola).jpg 0_1559396358317_20190601_151713 (Piccola).jpg

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • undefined
                            Phaedrux Moderator
                            last edited by 1 Jun 2019, 13:44

                            Looks good to me.

                            Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • undefined
                              deckingman
                              last edited by 1 Jun 2019, 15:30

                              That'll do.

                              Ian
                              https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                              https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • undefined
                                mrehorstdmd
                                last edited by mrehorstdmd 6 Jan 2019, 16:45 1 Jun 2019, 15:48

                                With this sort of thing I tend to think about what might go wrong and what I can do to prevent it. I try to only have to do things once. Making things as close to ideal (in the relevant properties) as possible reduces the things you have to consider if something goes wrong. If I use a plastic part in an assembly I tend to make it bulky to ensure rigidity, so I wouldn't use thin plastic flanges, even with side-webbing, to support a relatively large weight or something that will be loaded by a drive belt.

                                At the very least I would thicken the flange that bolts to the top side of the t-slot, maybe to the point of making it continuous with the body of the part. I'm not saying that your flange design won't be adequate, but if it isn't, you'll be redesigning and reprinting.

                                In the end, you should worry less about the plastic flexing and more about the t-slot it's bolted to twisting.

                                https://drmrehorst.blogspot.com/

                                undefined 1 Reply Last reply 1 Jun 2019, 16:15 Reply Quote 0
                                • undefined
                                  claustro @mrehorstdmd
                                  last edited by 1 Jun 2019, 16:15

                                  @mrehorstdmd
                                  is something like this enough "bulky"?

                                  0_1559405728244_lead screw mount 2 v2.jpg

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • undefined
                                    mrehorstdmd
                                    last edited by 1 Jun 2019, 16:40

                                    Yes, I'd do something like that. I'd also use modifier meshes to increase the fill density around the mounting bolt holes.

                                    https://drmrehorst.blogspot.com/

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • undefined
                                      Veti
                                      last edited by 1 Jun 2019, 16:41

                                      that reminds me there was a video by alex kenis about this
                                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Z7mZVvPlc8

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • undefined
                                        claustro
                                        last edited by 3 Jun 2019, 19:03

                                        While I am trying to fix the squareness of the frame I finalized!the Z axis belt system
                                        This is what it came out.
                                        I tried to make the belt running as much as possible around the pulley with this setup all the pulley has 180 degree belt contact.
                                        The 2 tensioners are temporary , I am going to print a support for it
                                        Any suggestion will be appreciated.
                                        Thank you
                                        Andrea
                                        0_1559588633233_20190603_173238 (Medium).jpg

                                        undefined undefined 2 Replies Last reply 3 Jun 2019, 19:09 Reply Quote 1
                                        • undefined
                                          deckingman @claustro
                                          last edited by 3 Jun 2019, 19:09

                                          @claustro How come those front two lead screws are set so far back from the front of the frame?

                                          Ian
                                          https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                                          https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                                          undefined 1 Reply Last reply 3 Jun 2019, 19:14 Reply Quote 0
                                          14 out of 42
                                          • First post
                                            14/42
                                            Last post
                                          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA