In RRF 3.01 and later, if a P parameter is provided then only the retraction parameters for the specified tool will be set. says : https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Gcode#Section_M207_Set_retract_length

@dc42 what purpose hardware reset pin is for?

@ctilley79 My BL-Touch used to go in blink state too ,So I've this line to change its mode to ALARM RELEASE in my config at the end and even at start and end of bed.g . Try this I suppose.
For deployment problem I would suggest you to increase dive height that is H parameter's value in M558 which is 3 right now. Mine is 8.

@fcwilt said in Question about bed probing:

so why not just continue the process and level it?

wanted to make it less human dependent .
No biggie... I'll go with current method .

Thanks for the help

@resh can you do following:
home any one axis. Manually light up respective endstop and see if axis actually stops immediately (Don't wait for it to reach to endstop).

If it doesn't stop then manually light up endstops of other axes and see if it stops .If so you have configured them wrongly. But if it doesn't stop at all then there might be wiring issue I guess.

@dc42 I have faced a similar issue , when upgraded from 3.3beta Feb1 release to to RRF 3.3.0.
Axes X-Y are connected on EXP1XDs and I have end-limits on both the low and high ends. After upgrade, Axes started hitting the end-limits on the other(high) ends . I suppose It is the same issue as of @marco-bona & due to incorrect homing, axes hit the endstops.

NOTE: After downgrading to previous release i.e. (3.3beta Feb1) , problem is gone.

Do you concur the issues are similar?

@dc42 Doing so is generating:

I don't see any .elf generated ? what am I supposed to do with these generated files to get .bin?

Dear @oliof @deckingman
I believe there is a grave misunderstanding here!

Please be rest assured, that I have not done anything that contradicts the licensing terms. The very first question in the thread was "Can I ....?" .
I am aware of GNU license terms and have adhered to it, being an active forum user, i also solve queries possible. However, It was a requirement from a naive user who doesn't know how to code and hence the question. Intention here was just to see if user requirement can be fulfilled and nothing more!
I guess the subject was misleading and fixed hence!

NOTE: my version of DWC = DWC with dark theme with some colors changed for user. no breaching of license.

I will check with Chris Hamm , if a solution can be derived to this kind of user requirement.

@dc42 Thank you!

Dear @oliof @deckingman
I believe there is a grave misunderstanding here!

Please be rest assured, that I have not done anything that contradicts the licensing terms. The very first question in the thread was "Can I ....?" .
I am aware of GNU license terms and have adhered to it, being an active forum user, i also solve queries possible. However, It was a requirement from a naive user who doesn't know how to code and hence the question. Intention here was just to see if user requirement can be fulfilled and nothing more!
I guess the subject was misleading and fixed hence!

NOTE: my version of DWC = DWC with dark theme with some colors changed for user. no breaching of license.

I will check with Chris Hamm , if a solution can be derived to this kind of user requirement.

@deckingman Dear Ian ,
Thank you for the details. We don't plan to take away rights from the user to upgrade the software. Any upgrade in RRF will always be directed to the user.
My requirement is not to disable a feature of processing an instruction, But rather avoid accidental change of address. And looking for suggestion on that.
Also, I believe a power cycle will retain back the original address.
The point here was merely to ensure no theft, by reading a list of machines connected via DWC, ensuring boards are not tampered with.

@dc42 @jay_s_uk I don't want anybody to change the MAC address of board as I don't want my version of DWC to work with any other board. So can I stop users from changing MAC address? If not then, is board given any unique serial number that I can use to impose security ?

@phaedrux Back when I started receiving warnings, my extruder was connected on driver 4 and Z was on 3. So I swapped the connections and now I receive warnings on driver 3 where extruder motor is connected right now. This confirms, there is no issue with drivers. Also I've dual extruder and I've observed that warnings come for extruder on work. So I believe motor is not an issue here either.
so to summarize:
1) error is always on the active extruder (the one thats printing)
2) its always on the driver where I connect the extruder. if I switch from driver 2 to 3, the error passes on to driver 3.
3) Phases of motors verified as suggested by Phaedrux and are correct.
4) The error frequency is not always same. Sometimes it appears every 10s while printing, sometimes 1 in 30 mins ..sometimes only few warnings appear during entire print.

Any suggestions to find the root cause here? @Phaedrux @dc42

Thank you.

@jay_s_uk Got it... Thanks for the reply

@dc42 said in Prohibit use of a code?:

@user3d do you mean completely preventing a code being used; or just preventing it after config.g has been run; or just preventing it being used in print files?

@dc42 Complete prevention of a code

Can I stop users from changing MAC address i.e. use of M540 ?

@dc42 Measured Phase resistance of motor = 4.8 ohm

@marco-bona Thanks! Did you try printing? If yes then can you confirm that its not step skipping and homing issue only?