Ok, but i thougt 1.19 is currently a Alpha.
I got installed:

Firmwarename: RepRapFirmware for Duet WiFi
Firmware Elektronik: Duet WiFi 1.0
Firmware Version: 1.18.1 (2017-04-09)
WiFi Server Version: 1.03 (ch fork)
Web Interface Version: 1.15a

I'm not sure exactly what you mean, but here goes:

MM/sec: in what context? In GCode, mm/min are always used, probably because GCode was originally designed for CNC machines which use lower speeds than we do.

current travel speed(live update mm/per sec instead of speed of percent of something you entered 10 hours ago on a long print)
current print speed(same)

The speed of the current move could be displayed, but how useful is that?

current acceleration settings You can use M201 and M204 without parameters to report them

extruder retratction settings (live update) Hard I know cause this is done in the slicing software but maybe could be done in firmware As you say, hard, but not impossible. Why not use firmware retraction instead?

Serial console of gcode that is being transmitted You can get this sent to the USB port if you send M111 S1 P3.

I'd +1 for having thermistor inputs (or temp sensing channels) being designated and viewable in a way that makes it easier to manage. I recently upgraded my corexy with a repaired duetwifi board, which has a problem with one thermistor channel, so I wanted to use the e1 thermistor with the e0 heater output, but couldn't get it to work.

EDIT as the board was faulty so ignor that, but being able to just display temp channel x would be handy, and decoupling the temperature channels from the heaters would alo be useful, could always have a table in config where you assign temp. channels to heaters.

That layout also takes up a lot more space, i.e. 9 rows of layout instead of just 3. This isn't so much of a problem on a PC, but would be an issue on a smartphone or small tablet. Some machines have additional axes U, V W which would also need to be included. The Extrude functionality also needs buttons to set the extrusion rate.

Perhaps someone can come up with another layout that is better than both the existing one and the one used by Pronterface, Repetier etc. and that most users can agree is better than both of those?

@JohnOCFII:

One of the nice plug-ins for OctoPrint keeps a list of printed jobs with their details (time printed, time to print, filament used, etc.) This also keeps a cumulative total of print time and filament used.

http://plugins.octoprint.org/plugins/printhistory/

Thanks for the consideration,

John

+1 😉

I will check the web release level. I am on 1.18.1

Thanks for the quick reply.

Don

I would like also to sort by last print date or how many time the file has been printed.
One last thing I would like to see how long it took to print

Thanks for the info.

I may have confused things by calling it a "type 5" which is how it is referenced on the DuetWifi web page for "Machine Properties" whereas the documentation on Z-probes refers to "mode 5".

So is this something that will likely be fixed in the next release?

Frederick

The resolution of the 7" panel is only 800x480 pixels, much lower than a tablet. Also it has nowhere near as much memory as a tablet, which limits what we can do. So if you want to run the full web interface, then you are better off buying a cheap tablet.

Can this also be added when the print is cancelled? it would really be amazing during calibration tests.

If you enable that option on the settings page, there should be a slider in the "Print Control" panel. I'll move that slider to a dedicate panel in my next DWC version though.

In fact this is already possible in DWC, I use that for exactly the same purpose. To make sure your macros show up in the desired order, name them like this:

1_Off
2_Half On
3_On

Obviously this would be easier to do if there was an easy way to rename files. I may have a look at this later today.

If you're interested, this is my 105MB gcode being printed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLwHOcH_UFk

@dc42:

I have it on my work list to add an option to the M81 command to defer powering down until specified thermostatic fans have turned off.

That would be perfect and a great solution.

Thanks,

Jeff