Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Another Predator

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Duet Hardware and wiring
    11
    204
    14.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Carloundefined
      Carlo @Phaedrux
      last edited by

      @Phaedrux

      Hiya,

      Yeah both H0/H1 have and they are in the config.
      I'm calling it now..... I'm done off to research a replacement.

      Really appreciate all the help from everyone big THANK YOU!

      droftartsundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • NexxCatundefined
        NexxCat @Carlo
        last edited by

        @Carlo
        Did you use a single sheet of paper when it asked, just regular printer paper? Alternatively, if you have some feeler gauges, you can use a 0.10mm gauge.

        Carloundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • droftartsundefined
          droftarts administrators @Carlo
          last edited by

          @Carlo From my earlier post: When you swapped the original board back in, did you also put the original effector back on, or did it use the smart effector? If you used the original effector (and presumably original probe), can you try that with the Duet? This would at least narrow down if it's the effector or the Duet.

          Ian

          Bed-slinger - Mini5+ WiFi/1LC | RRP Fisher v1 - D2 WiFi | Polargraph - D2 WiFi | TronXY X5S - 6HC/Roto | CNC router - 6HC | Tractus3D T1250 - D2 Eth

          Carloundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Carloundefined
            Carlo @NexxCat
            last edited by Carlo

            @NexxCat

            Hi NexxCat

            I used the back off a sticker which is 0.1mm on my calipers.
            Just found my gauges !

            Thanks

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Carloundefined
              Carlo @NexxCat
              last edited by

              @NexxCat

              Hi,

              So I used the well 0.102 feeler gauge though it is .10 with my calipers and 3 times got 3 heights.
              I did video the whole process but that won't help me
              The numbers don't actually help because they are not accurate though one of them is:

              M98 P"0:/macros/Z probe report"
              Z probe trigger height set to -0.159 mm

              I don't think it's the effector because it does what it is supposed to do and no matter what trigger height I put in G31 line its the same outcome and the effector does return the same probe heights all be it not one after the other 🙂
              maybe the drivers are not calculating correctly I don't know but it is what it is and that is not usable.

              Cheers for your help.

              C

              NexxCatundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • NexxCatundefined
                NexxCat @Carlo
                last edited by

                @Carlo
                Ok, last thing I can think of, just to double check if the actual positioning is being repeatable. Run these commands one at a time, or save it as a macro:

                ; Disable any baby-stepping and the bed mesh
                M290 R0 S0
                G29 S2
                
                ; Home the effector
                G28
                
                ; Heat bed to 60C & nozzle to 130C
                M104 S130 T0
                M190 S60 T0
                M109 S130 T0
                
                ; Run delta calibration
                G32
                
                ; Move the effector to 0,0,Max height
                G1 X0 Y0 F4500
                G1 Z500 F4500
                
                ; Move the effector back to 10mm off the bed
                G1 Z10 F4500
                
                ; Slowly move down to 0.1mm
                G1 Z0.1 F600
                

                When the macro is finished, the nozzle is at 0.1 on the Z axis. Use the paper or a 0.1mm feeler gauge and see if the nozzle truly is at 0.1mm

                Carloundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • Carloundefined
                  Carlo @droftarts
                  last edited by Carlo

                  @droftarts

                  Hi Ian,

                  I used the original effector with the mag arms (printed the adapters) whats funny is I didn't even try to get anything level or square I literally slapped it together set the offset 1 level and it just worked.
                  I have the effector still wired I can carefully attach it to the Duet2 and try it i cant fit the effector to the other board it's locked down
                  but I've written this thing off now I don't expect this to ever work with duet but after spending all this time I do want to know whats wrong maybe it will help someone else some day...probably not

                  I post a video of it once its fitted

                  Thanks
                  C

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Carloundefined
                    Carlo @NexxCat
                    last edited by

                    @NexxCat

                    I'll do that now.

                    Cheers
                    C

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Carloundefined
                      Carlo @NexxCat
                      last edited by

                      @NexxCat

                      Hi NexxCat,

                      No its 0.1mm to high

                      NexxCatundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • NexxCatundefined
                        NexxCat @Carlo
                        last edited by

                        @Carlo
                        What is your current Z probe offset?

                        Carloundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Carloundefined
                          Carlo @NexxCat
                          last edited by

                          @NexxCat

                          G31 P100 X0 Y0 Z-0.159

                          NexxCatundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • NexxCatundefined
                            NexxCat @Carlo
                            last edited by

                            @Carlo
                            I can't remember offhand which way to adjust the offset to bring it closer, but try both of these, one will certainly be too high, but the other, does that give you a 0.1mm gap when running the macro I posted?

                            G31 P100 X0 Y0 Z-0.059
                            
                            G31 P100 X0 Y0 Z-0.259
                            
                            Carloundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • Carloundefined
                              Carlo @NexxCat
                              last edited by

                              @NexxCat

                              They have all been tried

                              it's 0.05 to bring it closer dc42 suggested 0.05 so I've tried all the -0. possible infact the video I posted is -0.05

                              NexxCatundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • NexxCatundefined
                                NexxCat @Carlo
                                last edited by NexxCat

                                @Carlo
                                I know you've tried them whilst printing, but try -0.059 and run the macro. Is the gap 0.1mm?

                                Carloundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Carloundefined
                                  Carlo @NexxCat
                                  last edited by

                                  @NexxCat

                                  Doing it now

                                  Bang on

                                  NexxCatundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • NexxCatundefined
                                    NexxCat @Carlo
                                    last edited by

                                    @Carlo
                                    So with -0.059, the gap is exactly 0.1mm after running the macro I posted. Correct?

                                    Carloundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Carloundefined
                                      Carlo @NexxCat
                                      last edited by

                                      @NexxCat

                                      Yes spot on 0.1mm

                                      NexxCatundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • NexxCatundefined
                                        NexxCat @Carlo
                                        last edited by

                                        @Carlo
                                        Ok, set that in your config. Then create the bed mesh with G29 S0. Once the mesh is complete, try to print the levelling model.

                                        I know you've done this so many times before, but let's try now we know the nozzle positioning is correct ok? Use the level_test.gcode I have you before, because I know it doesn't have anything in it to mess with the settings.

                                        Carloundefined 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • Carloundefined
                                          Carlo @NexxCat
                                          last edited by

                                          @NexxCat

                                          Will do that now

                                          Thanks
                                          C

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Carloundefined
                                            Carlo @NexxCat
                                            last edited by

                                            @NexxCat

                                            It failed but it's too close to the bed just I think but its the best its ever looked.

                                            NexxCatundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA